Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, harderfaster said:

At some of their dates last year they actually opened with Mr Brightside, which is a fairly bold move. 

(For example: https://www.setlist.fm/setlist/the-killers/2018/sittertobel-st-gallen-switzerland-23ea04db.html

They did this when I saw them in Vegas.

NB: I didn't go to Vegas specifically to see them, went for my mate's wedding. Then the Killers announced a date there the day after we arrived, and as him and his missus were big Killers fans it was a no-brainer.

NB NB: The Bravery were playing Hard Rock Cafe there then the night after. Didn't go and seem them. It was an honest mistake.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fishman said:

He is bad and, yes, I know I'm not the target market and I have to listen to loads of it through a teenager's bedroom wall.

The Guardian (for once) got it spot on with this single review ....

Post Malone - Better Now

“Music (noun): Vocal or instrumental sounds combined to produce beauty of form, harmony, and expression of emotion”. Your chums and mine at the OED, there. By that definition, this four-minute aural prolapse doesn’t actually qualify as music. So what is it? Well, imagine if someone farted directly down your earhole and, as well as hearing the point-blank bumwaft, your ear could also smell it. That, Auto-Tuned, is exactly what this is.

I've not even heard Post Malone yet, but I'm fairly convinced that output that oldies don't even recognise as music is exactly what should be going on, rather than #wrongezra blandness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QOTSA are one of those bands who are well respected in certain circles, but the vast majority of people will only know No-one Knows.

I know Glasto has had acts headline which most people won't know the discography of (Metallica, Kanye etc) but they seemed more of a left field choice for a specific reason.

I just can't see QOTSA ever being close to Glasto headliners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, henry bear said:

I suppose the appeal of doing a secret set for some artists is that it conveys an ambiguity as to where their actual pecking order is at the likes of Glasto. So Elbow doing a secret set at the Park May have felt like an event for their fans, and also hides the fact that Pyramid sub was as good as it gets for them.

That came across on the telly as if that was just a normal slot for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Martini Police said:

Radiohead were clearly headliner size when they played the Park though, they always were. But as said above, nobody is disputing that the Killers are headliner size either, are they? I think it's just that people feel it's stale. I think the opportunity to see elsewhere is important here because the Killers are a bit over-saturated. The set in 2017 just adds (albeit quite significantly) to that, rather than being the sole cause of it. 

What's what difference from Reading doing similar like they have previously?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, briddj said:

QOTSA are one of those bands who are well respected in certain circles, but the vast majority of people will only know No-one Knows.

I know Glasto has had acts headline which most people won't know the discography of (Metallica, Kanye etc) but they seemed more of a left field choice for a specific reason.

I just can't see QOTSA ever being close to Glasto headliners.

I think they're still another killer album away from being ready, as I said above Villains was a letdown after Like Clockwork and seems to have set them back a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

I think they're still another killer album away from being ready, as I said above Villains was a letdown after Like Clockwork and seems to have set them back a little.

I actually preferred Villains. Like Clockwork did nothing for me. 

Their show at Wembley arena in 2017 was the best I've seen them and nearly my gig of the year. Will agree the Mad Cool set didn't do a lot for me though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, zeppelin said:

I actually preferred Villains. Like Clockwork did nothing for me. 

Their show at Wembley arena in 2017 was the best I've seen them and nearly my gig of the year. Will agree the Mad Cool set didn't do a lot for me though. 

I'm the exact opposite - Like Clockwork is my favourite album of theirs, but Villains left me cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

I disagree that the Killers will be of much interest to the armchair viewer.  I suspect that  someone who doesn't often play festivals or has a bit of mystique about them would appeal more to the casual viewer than an ubiquitous act that the average fest punter can barely move 10 yards without bumping into.  They're inextricably tied to their era without having the sort of storied career or discography that would see them gradually morph into a heritage act. They're a nostalgia act for people too young to be nostalgic.  They're as shallow as a puddle and so will be their set.

your average Glastonbury on the BBC viewer doesn't go to festivals, doesn't like camping, doesn't like mud, doesn't know what a longdrop is, doesn't want to go to the toilet in a portaloo after that smelly one at the outdoor P!nk gig they went to 8 years ago, doesn't give a fuck about stages in tents let alone anywhere else.

they flick around the BBC after Ant&Dec or Celebrity Jungle Dancing on Ice or whatever other shite is on on Saturday night, and want to see Ed Sheeran, Coldplay, The Killers, Adele, Dua Lipa, or some other mainstream stuff that they recognise from the radio.

they certainly don't give a shite about anyone with "mystique" or a rare festival booking. The have no clue how often The Killers play festivals. They've never heard of TRNSMT or Latitude or almost any festival that gets discussed on here.

I'd say 95% of armchair viewers want to see The Killers over Kate Bush ("what's this weird old woman shit?  flick over to Graeme Norton. pass me the Dominos" etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly I think the time has came and went for Queens to headline Glastonbury. 

Its harder to break into the first team when you’re 34 than it is at 17. I think Foals aren’t far off falling into this category too.

You're thinking to yourself ‘they’re one big album off headlining the thing’ next album and singles come and go and it just pushes them away further and further with each attempt to break the mould.

Like it or not but 1975 and Catfish are the young up and coming tricky wingers making a name for themselves in the premier league, there’s much more chance and reason to give them the boost whilst their upwards trajectory is still on the rise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, StevieGed said:

Sadly I think the time has came and went for Queens to headline Glastonbury. 

Its harder to break into the first team when you’re 34 than it is at 17. I think Foals aren’t far off falling into this category too.

You're thinking to yourself ‘they’re one big album off headlining the thing’ next album and singles come and go and it just pushes them away further and further with each attempt to break the mould.

Like it or not but 1975 and Catfish are the young up and coming tricky wingers making a name for themselves in the premier league, there’s much more chance and reason to give them the boost whilst their upwards trajectory is still on the rise. 

Let’s hope they are like Gael Kakuta...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Need to agree to disagree on that one bud.  It's why the world and his dog seemed to watch Dolly Parton, but no one seemed to give a fiddlers about Kasabian playing a few hours later.

Dolly Parton got the biggest crowd I have ever seen at Glastonbury, it was close to, if not, more than The Stones got and I walked round the top of Kasabian and the crowd was pretty big I thought. As @ghostdancer1 said, The Killers headlining Glastonbury is exactly what you're average Glastonbury punter wants, as do those watching at home.

A lot of people on here seem to get caught up in the notion that they and people who post on this forum are your average Glastonbury punter and they judge everyone else by their own tastes, when unfortunately that is no longer the case when it comes to Glastonbury. 

Hence why The Killers are back headlining and not Nick Cave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Divein said:

A lot of people on here seem to get caught up in the notion that they and people who post on this forum are your average Glastonbury punter and they judge everyone else by their own tastes, when unfortunately that is no longer the case when it comes to Glastonbury. 

People on a dedicated Internet forum misjudging what the average person thinks? Na, I'm not having that for a second! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QOTSA shows are very loose and all depend what mood Homme is in. They don't have structured shows and big productions like most big bands. Hence why they're a risk. Have seen some great great QOTSA shows and some shite shite QOTSA shows over the years. 

You never know if Homme is going to be all positive and nail it or just roll out the "you work for me" security guard shtick and kick a photographer in the face. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ghostdancer1 said:

your average Glastonbury on the BBC viewer doesn't go to festivals, doesn't like camping, doesn't like mud, doesn't know what a longdrop is, doesn't want to go to the toilet in a portaloo after that smelly one at the outdoor P!nk gig they went to 8 years ago, doesn't give a fuck about stages in tents let alone anywhere else.

they flick around the BBC after Ant&Dec or Celebrity Jungle Dancing on Ice or whatever other shite is on on Saturday night, and want to see Ed Sheeran, Coldplay, The Killers, Adele, Dua Lipa, or some other mainstream stuff that they recognise from the radio.

they certainly don't give a shite about anyone with "mystique" or a rare festival booking. The have no clue how often The Killers play festivals. They've never heard of TRNSMT or Latitude or almost any festival that gets discussed on here.

I'd say 95% of armchair viewers want to see The Killers over Kate Bush ("what's this weird old woman shit?  flick over to Graeme Norton. pass me the Dominos" etc)

Totally agree, I know loads of people who always say to me why do I go to glasto, with the mud, the queues, camping etc etc. They would rather just watch it on telly. I get fed up trying to explain the ethos of the festival, the sense of belonging and the euphoria we get, never mind the intense excitement of the build up. They just don’t get it. So the headliners are basically what the armchair viewers judge the festival by.  Good for them, all the better chance of tickets for the rest of us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Fine. There's a huge audience sitting at home curious to see what The Killers will come up with.

That's the point though, they don't (generally). They don't give a toss about what they come up with, whether it's rare or edgy or pushes the boundaries. Chances are they flicked through the Radio Times over their cornflakes and earmarked it for later viewing. They just want the 'hits'. 

I'm no advocate for either The Killers or The Cure's booking if that's what we get, but with the former I can at least understand it from a booking perspective. Generally popular to most attending, generally watchable to those at home. Safe booking and that's it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...