Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, incident said:

It does sound reasonable - and for reasons I can't quite articulate I do think that going Glastonbury > Belgium is far more likely than the other way around would have been (when people were talking about him playing Sunday).

 

I *think* all the gear for all the Pyramid acts the following day is loaded the night before and stacked ready in order. So load in for Pyramid at Glasto if playing at any point on the Sunday is sometime between 0200-0800 on Sunday morning. Whereas load-in for an arena gig is going to be more flexible and probably in normal working hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, scaryclaireyfairy said:

Did the AM source specifically say headlining or just that they were there on the Fri? I know it’s a stretch but there’s the vague possibility of the opening Other slot. 

I'm no AM fan, quite the opposite, but they have songs with over a billion plays on Youtube... I'd be surprised if they opened the Other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

I *think* all the gear for all the Pyramid acts the following day is loaded the night before and stacked ready in order. So load in for Pyramid at Glasto if playing at any point on the Sunday is sometime between 0200-0800 on Sunday morning. Whereas load-in for an arena gig is going to be more flexible and probably in normal working hours.

Also lots of artists have effectively 2 sets if they are elaborate and so he may have spares that can be used for Glastonbury and still get stuff to Belgium. Nothing against AM at all but would be kind of fun if they ended up not headlining as they seem to have been a banker in most peoples minds for so long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok so I know AM are strongly suggested for Fri .... what if this was actually sat ( 2 consecutive nights I know ) and we had harry fri , AM sat and Elton sunday ...... They were the 3 acts that were suggested to me a while back and this would be the only way they would fit .... prepares to hide ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, *if* AM are playing, it's because they have a previously unknown relationship for the festival and are doing it at a discount rate. And if that relationship exists it's therefore possible they're doing some sort of secret set or such. Seems vanishingly unlikely though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im actually quite liking a few ideas being thrown around ... ok some are unlikely but its definately more fun than the GNR , AM , ELTON locked in discussion ... we also know from recently that things can change even if they look confirmed ... see legends thread for that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay prefacing this with the fact that I’m not remotely in the know, and the person who forwarded it to me isn’t either. But on November 24th I was forwarded a message from my friends sister (so it is is VERY heard it through the grapevine, which is why I disregarded it mostly at the time as speculative) saying ‘my music industry sources have been talking, Glastonbury headliners - Harry Styles, Elton John and Arctic Monkeys’)

who knows how much truth in it, but was a couple of weeks before the Elton announcement (obv his hat was always in the ring) but given others have been hearing Harry, it seems pertinent to mention. 
 

(I disregarded it even further when Elton was Sunday as HS can’t do Saturday and I thought Arctics were nailed on for Friday, but if they aren’t…)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

I mean, *if* AM are playing, it's because they have a previously unknown relationship for the festival and are doing it at a discount rate. And if that relationship exists it's therefore possible they're doing some sort of secret set or such. Seems vanishingly unlikely though.

Are you seriously suggesting a band that have headlined twice don’t have a relationship with the festival, or it’s some kind of secret? 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, king_oxymoron said:

Okay prefacing this with the fact that I’m not remotely in the know, and the person who forwarded it to me isn’t either. But on November 24th I was forwarded a message from my friends sister (so it is is VERY heard it through the grapevine, which is why I disregarded it mostly at the time as speculative) saying ‘my music industry sources have been talking, Glastonbury headliners - Harry Styles, Elton John and Arctic Monkeys’)

who knows how much truth in it, but was a couple of weeks before the Elton announcement (obv his hat was always in the ring) but given others have been hearing Harry, it seems pertinent to mention. 
 

(I disregarded it even further when Elton was Sunday as HS can’t do Saturday and I thought Arctics were nailed on for Friday, but if they aren’t…)

Well that fits with what I heard … and around the same time …. Posted above and posted at that time also …. Hmm 🤔 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, august1 said:

If they were desperately scrambling for headliners moving AM to Saturday and HS breaking his normal gig rules to go from UK to Belgium isn't exactly a mad leap is it?

Not sure they’d be scrabbling at this stage but yeah I agree it’s not a mad leap 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...