Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Stormzy ‘#Merky Takeover’ headlining Snowbombing. Dunno what that means, or what it means for Glastonbury, but he’s playing festivals next year if that was ever in doubt.

Someone will be bored at work tomorrow and will sort out for us what past headliners have done at Glastonbury in the same year.

Edited by StupidDream
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bradders said:

Stormzy headlining Snowbombing shows he won’t be headlining Glastonbury, if people still believed he could.

Pretty much. 

Subheadliner perhaps but you don’t headline Snowboming and The Big G in the same year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/30/2018 at 3:26 PM, FatAmmy said:

As a huge Queens fan, I'm perfectly fine with them not rising to headliner level...I'd rather be able to see them in (marginally) smaller venues

Huge Queens fan here and I have to agree with others, they are not Pyramid Stage headliners and unless they drop something SFTD or Like Clockwork level...its unlikely to happen. Them at the Other Stage would be amazing.

That said, Id rather NIN at Glastonbury right now. Its been way too long and their tour looks amazing right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, StupidDream said:

Kanye headlining... Interested to see how that will go down with his opinions and recent outings. Coachella doesn't strike me as a meeting place for conservatives. (Or maybe most people don't think in general, tend to overestimate humanity.)

He'll go down fine at Coachella but bar Justin T maybe that's woeful!

3 hours ago, nikkic said:

Pretty much. 

Subheadliner perhaps but you don’t headline Snowboming and The Big G in the same year. 

Yup, while it may be Austria and people are different sizes ..it's not happening.

It very much points more to The Cure, Arctics and Macca. Stormzy will sub most likely as subs haven't always been bigger than 3rd..he'll get the crowd going for the headliner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

My guess right now would be:

Friday:

The Cure - TWOD - Dua Lipa

Saturday:

Arctic Monkeys - Stormzy - Vampire Weekend

Sunday:

Macca - Liam G - George Ezra - Kylie

#sausagefest

TWOD before The Cure I doubt it.

I'd go

The Cure, Liam G, TWOD

Arctic Monkeys, Stormzy, American female artist.

Macca, Dua Lipa, George Ezra

Big sing along act inbetween on day 1, female artist day 2 and Female sub to mix it up a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

TWOD before The Cure I doubt it.

I'd go

The Cure, Liam G, TWOD

Arctic Monkeys, Stormzy, American female artist.

Macca, Dua Lipa, George Ezra

Big sing along act inbetween on day 1, female artist day 2 and Female sub to mix it up a bit.

Can’t see Dua Lipa subbing, third down for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, zahidf said:

Childish gambino, Justin Timberlake and kanye headlining Coachella next year apparently 

Don't know if this makes my 'Gambino headlining Other' shout from last week any more or less likely.

Shows that he'll still be touring at least relatively close to the festival though if true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 minutes ago, mcshed said:

As someone whose been off the site for the last year, where does these Cure, Arctics, McCartney rumours come from?

 

Cure and Macca Neil had some information. AM is a guess based on them not doing RandL according to a person on RandL forum and ArcticMonkeysUS Blake saying they are playing an iconic June festival which you ‘have to assume means Glastonbury’. 

Edited by RarerThanDandyB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mcshed said:

As someone whose been off the site for the last year, where does these Cure, Arctics, McCartney rumours come from?

 

I think @eFestivals has solid info regarding McCartney and The Cure. AM I believe comes from speculation from a superfan who has them pegged for an "iconic festival". A chap who correctly called Catfish at APE and The Killers at Latitude also gave Foo Fighters, The 1975 and Twenty One Pilots as R+L headliners today, which would rule that out as being the "iconic" festival for AM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 hour ago, RarerThanDandyB said:

 

Cure and Macca Neil had some information. AM is a guess based on them not doing RandL according to a person on RandL forum and ArcticMonkeysUS Blake saying they are playing an iconic June festival which you ‘have to assume means Glastonbury’. 

plus, I got a bit of further info that suggests them doing Glasto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you rabble think about Take That headlining? I don't mean in terms of musical taste, but in terms of likelihood.

They're touring until early June next year, have a back catalogue of pop staples, and have previously said they'd love to.

They'd possibly create more of a tantrum than Kanye West but they're arguably more qualified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kalifire said:

What do you rabble think about Take That headlining? I don't mean in terms of musical taste, but in terms of likelihood.

They're touring until early June next year, have a back catalogue of pop staples, and have previously said they'd love to.

They'd possibly create more of a tantrum than Kanye West but they're arguably more qualified.

I love it when threads collide, the Headliners 2019 thread and the What would stop you going thread together at last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, kalifire said:

What do you rabble think about Take That headlining? I don't mean in terms of musical taste, but in terms of likelihood.

They're touring until early June next year, have a back catalogue of pop staples, and have previously said they'd love to.

They'd possibly create more of a tantrum than Kanye West but they're arguably more qualified.

Think someone said they have dates every night of G weekend, thankfully. Think it’s near-inevitable they’ll pop up eventually, most likely when Robbie and Jason next rejoin - although then again I seem to remember they were one of the acts who had dates which suited the slot The Who eventually filled in 2015 but weren’t booked, so it may be that Emily understandably wants nothing to do with them.

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...