Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Emily interview


dccool

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Glastonbury gets the acts cheaper, and part of the trade-off for that is not announcing the acts early so they're able to sell tickets for other shows

So the measure is specifically targeting us - we who have our commitment to Glastonbury and in return they are hoping that we pay (a lot) extra to see acts twice. This stinks as much as secret sets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hfuhruhurr said:

So the measure is specifically targeting us - we who have our commitment to Glastonbury and in return they are hoping that we pay (a lot) extra to see acts twice. This stinks as much as secret sets.

Eh, do you need a cup of tea or something?

Why do you care so much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hfuhruhurr said:

So the measure is specifically targeting us - we who have our commitment to Glastonbury and in return they are hoping that we pay (a lot) extra to see acts twice. This stinks as much as secret sets.

not really, Glastonbury don't care whatsoever if you go to some other gigs or not. it makes no difference to them.

I really don't get what your point is TBH

Edited by ghostdancer1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broadly speaking aside from headliners any act you see at Glastonbury is going to have a reduced set. If you like an act enough it's in your interests to pay to see them elsewhere. Not forgetting Glastonbury remains ridiculously good value for money given the amount of music you have access to over the 5 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hfuhruhurr said:

So the measure is specifically targeting us - we who have our commitment to Glastonbury and in return they are hoping that we pay (a lot) extra to see acts twice. This stinks as much as secret sets.

Have you been before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matt42 said:

Have you been before?

Yep, every year since 2010, and every year I spend money seeing an act that turns up on the line-up and every year I'm the other side of the site when a secret set of an artist I'd like to see is on. So, for me, both measures are negatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hfuhruhurr said:

I probably do!!

It's just that on a limited budget, I'd can't afford to pay twice.

As others have said, if you're a big fan of an act go see them if you get the chance.  If not just cross your fingers like the rest of us.

The one certainty - it's not going to change because you're a bit crabby this morning ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hfuhruhurr said:

Yep, every year since 2010, and every year I spend money seeing an act that turns up on the line-up and every year I'm the other side of the site when a secret set of an artist I'd like to see is on. So, for me, both measures are negatives.

Ah I see chum

i always miss secret sets that I don’t have prior knowledge about.

I guess it’s just gods plan

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, hfuhruhurr said:

So the measure is specifically targeting us - we who have our commitment to Glastonbury and in return they are hoping that we pay (a lot) extra to see acts twice. This stinks as much as secret sets.

But in return we get to see those acts for an overall fantastic value ticket price .... for £250 I still marvel at the amount that is put on for our entertainment 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, hfuhruhurr said:

Help me out with the logic here, with 90% booked they could announce a lot of acts.

Most other festivals have already announced a major part of their line-up.

So, is it that they want us, specifically Glastonbury attendees, to shell out for the gigs of artists we'll already see in June?

It's not as if extra tickets will be sold, we're all committed. I don't understand why they want us to pay twice?

Because the acts want us to shell out to see them at other places than Glastonbury.  This helps Glasto is securing otherwise "exclusive" bookings and to negotiate a lower price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More excited that we're gonna get the full main stage line up poster as the initial drop. I know we still won't have times but will mean not only knowing who is playing but where, gonna be much easier to work out headliner clashes at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kingbadger said:

More excited that we're gonna get the full main stage line up poster as the initial drop. I know we still won't have times but will mean not only knowing who is playing but where, gonna be much easier to work out headliner clashes at least.

I missed that - when/where was that mentioned? Does it mean the first poster will be acts by stage, Pyramid through the Park?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She said the lineup was 90% booked but as there were thousands of acts it was hard to fit them all on one poster, so they usually put a few up front.

Sounds like she’s reaffirming we’ll get the usual “taster” poster first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bradders said:

She said the lineup was 90% booked but as there were thousands of acts it was hard to fit them all on one poster, so they usually put a few up front.

Sounds like she’s reaffirming we’ll get the usual “taster” poster first.

Yep, that's what I got from that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Announcing Janelle as a WH headliner but not giving away which day is a real fucker. I’m gonna assume she’s in the midst of a horrible clash and make my peace with it - if it turns out she isn’t then that’ll be a really nice surprise. 

The genius of Glastonbury marketing. Release limited info, for free, and then let us lot and the media speculate and do the marketing for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...