Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, priest17 said:

 

He he, you've still got 30 to go, which is one I really enjoyed. 

Being much more pished than advisable and setting off loads of fireworks in the field which is now Spring Ground on the Wednesday of Glastonbury 98.

Happy days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not generally one of those "the glory days are over" types but if we genuinely are staring directly down the barrel of The Strokes in the year of our lord 2019 then it's difficult to be flippant. 

I dont exaggerate when I say that this is one of the symbols of the forthcoming apocalypse, as revealed to John of Patmos: the Seven Headed Dragon, the Great Whore Babalon and the Early Noughties One Trick Ponies unjustly claiming dominion over the earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fear not brother, a mere glitch in The Matrix.

Through the peaks and troughs we must venture.

For every Beyoncé we must endure a Sinead O Connor moment.

For every Rolling Stones a Travis.

If we want Madonna we must encounter a Strokes moment. 

The balance must be re-set. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, despite CalGon's doomsday prophesying it looks increasingly like The Strokes are the most realistic prospect for our third headliner. Had a go at putting together a setlist that I think would have a chance of banging on the Pyramid (it presumes they'll have some sort of new music to drop between now and then);

  • The Modern Age
  • Soma
  • New Song #1
  • Someday
  • 12:51
  • Reptilia
  • Is This It
  • Juicebox
  • Automatic Stop
  • Trying Your Luck
  • New York City Cops
  • The Way It Is
  • Barely Legal
  • What Ever Happened
  • Last Nite

ENCORE 1

  • New Song #2
  • Heart in a Cage
  • Hard to Explain

ENCORE 2

  • Under The Cover of Darkness
  • Take It or Leave It
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

Haha I see, bloody hot race last year 

Unbelievable mate. It was my first marathon and I had to do something to celebrate my 50th. Got round in 5.59 which I was very pleased with being 17.5 stone as well! Doing it again in 2020 with my Wife for her 50th, although she has Glastonbury 2020 to look forward to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Strokes are not headlining Glastonbury 2019.

The Strokes are not headlining Glastonbury 2019.

I have no idea who is...

But The Strokes are not headlining Glastonbury 2019*

 

 

 

 

* (The Strokes may well be headlining Glastonbury 2019. But I’m still expecting something else to come up and make a whole lot more sense).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Okay, despite CalGon's doomsday prophesying it looks increasingly like The Strokes are the most realistic prospect for our third headliner. Had a go at putting together a setlist that I think would have a chance of banging on the Pyramid (it presumes they'll have some sort of new music to drop between now and then);

  • The Modern Age
  • Soma
  • New Song #1
  • Someday
  • 12:51
  • Reptilia
  • Is This It
  • Juicebox
  • Automatic Stop
  • Trying Your Luck
  • New York City Cops
  • The Way It Is
  • Barely Legal
  • What Ever Happened
  • Last Nite

ENCORE 1

  • New Song #2
  • Heart in a Cage
  • Hard to Explain

ENCORE 2

  • Under The Cover of Darkness
  • Take It or Leave It

Where is YOLO? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Okay, despite CalGon's doomsday prophesying it looks increasingly like The Strokes are the most realistic prospect for our third headliner. Had a go at putting together a setlist that I think would have a chance of banging on the Pyramid (it presumes they'll have some sort of new music to drop between now and then);

  • The Modern Age
  • Soma
  • New Song #1
  • Someday
  • 12:51
  • Reptilia
  • Is This It
  • Juicebox
  • Automatic Stop
  • Trying Your Luck
  • New York City Cops
  • The Way It Is
  • Barely Legal
  • What Ever Happened
  • Last Nite

ENCORE 1

  • New Song #2
  • Heart in a Cage
  • Hard to Explain

ENCORE 2

  • Under The Cover of Darkness
  • Take It or Leave It

Mint

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is This years likely line up getting as much of a hard time as the year we had jay z, kings of Leon and the verve? I remember thinking the verve were way past being relevant, went along anyway and had a great time. The strokes have definitely got a much livelier, stronger back catalogue than those guys. Jay Z had loads of people questioning the booking, Turned out (for me anyway) to be the best set of the weekend. He even came on stage to a video montage of Noel Gallagher slagging him off about being at Glastonbury. And kings of Leon still hadn’t released Sex on fire so weren’t the global superstars they went on to become. 

 

Feeling devastated by any of the headliners just seems to be part of going to the festival. For me it was the year of Adele, muse and Coldplay. Felt gutted by that one. Gave muse a go and had an incredible night.

Edited by lobo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Struggle to see why anyone keeping up with recent UK festival announcements would think The Strokes is a bad deal.

It’s hardly a vintage year for any set of festival headliners is it?

Whats the best lineup out there at the min?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nikkic said:

Fear not brother, a mere glitch in The Matrix.

Through the peaks and troughs we must venture.

For every Beyoncé we must endure a Sinead O Connor moment.

For every Rolling Stones a Travis.

If we want Madonna we must encounter a Strokes moment. 

The balance must be re-set. 

Travis, whilst being bang average (I have a soft spot for them though) were at the time, on the up. They were as big if not bigger than Stormzy is now. 

The Strokes makes zero sense to me. They were not that big to command a Glastonbury headline appearance after about 2003 or 04.

I loved is this it, but to me - it seems very very strange. 

Would they even fill out arenas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Struggle to see why anyone keeping up with recent UK festival announcements would think The Strokes is a bad deal.

Because they’re a terrible borefest live. I understand that it really does look like slim pickings on the festival headliner front this year, but The Strokes falling asleep on stage is no prize amongst them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Because they’re a terrible borefest live. I understand that it really does look like slim pickings on the festival headliner front this year, but The Strokes falling asleep on stage is no prize amongst them.

So you’ll have no trouble missing them for Wu Tang Clan or Chemical Brothers then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...