Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, gfa said:

Been looking at post history and he got the killers 2 months early (was it common knowledge in 2019?). Lots of TRNSMT info too for 2019

Liam Gallagher is definitely big enough love him or hate him, few artists could do 2 knebworth shows alongside a schedule of pretty excessive touring

And how many things has this poster gotten wrong over the years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

I don't think Liam Gallagher headlines, but if he did, regardless of what many on these boards might think, it would be generally well-received and very busy on the night

No doubt.  He's clearly massively popular.  Fuck knows why, but he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liam Gallagher is not a quality act. Shite live in terms of energy and vocal ability. Seen him multiple times and been disappointed every time. 
Considering he plays Oasis songs for 11/17 of his setlist shows no one actually really cares about his solo venture and it is more an excuse to keep touring and reliving past glory. 

Would be an incredibly underwhelming headliner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pr0paneNightm4re said:

Liam Gallagher is not a quality act. Shite live in terms of energy and vocal ability. Seen him multiple times and been disappointed every time. 
Considering he plays Oasis songs for 11/17 of his setlist shows no one actually really cares about his solo venture and it is more an excuse to keep touring and reliving past glory. 

Would be an incredibly underwhelming headliner

Absolutely superb at Knebworth earlier this year. Doesn't seem like a progressive Glasto booking mind but as others have said the field will be chocka block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t at all buy that Liam is gonna headline, but if he does end up doing it you’ve gotta think they’ve gone through a lot of other options to get there and must’ve had a big last minute dropout. 

Yeah he’s obviously big enough… but he’s still a weak booking for Glastonbury, especially after subbing in ‘19 and interest noticeably waning massively any time he played a non-Oasis song. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

AM, GNR, Liam, Roxy makes me think that things have gone horribly wrong and there’s probably been some very intense meetings in the office.

it really does look like cost of living glastonbury though

Define "gone horribly wrong", I mean it's not a particularly progressive trio by any means, but it is still three stadium sized acts that many people would be very happy with.

FWIW I don't for second think that would be the trio. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

AM, GNR, Liam, Roxy makes me think that things have gone horribly wrong and there’s probably been some very intense meetings in the office.

it really does look like cost of living glastonbury though

It comes to something when Roxy Music are the most exciting on the list doesn’t it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does feel very much like they're scraping the barrel with having LG headline - especially if it's because of a drop out 8 months before the festival so you'd assume there'd be a decent list of acts to go through before settling with LG.

Maybe the CoL / inflation / weak pound is catching up to Glastonbury and is impacting American bookings.

Either that or the info is wrong.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

I don't think Liam Gallagher headlines, but if he did, regardless of what many on these boards might think, it would be generally well-received and very busy on the night

The thing is the same could be said for anyone almost. If you put them on at headliner time. Nobody will ever headline to an empty Pyramid field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...