Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

I know what you mean. I felt similar before The Who in 2015. I knew Daltrey's voice was shot but it was The fucking Who. I decided that the best course of action was to get myself to a certain medicated state and enjoy it for what it was in the moment. Mind you, when I watched the footage later on that week it was teeth-gnashingly bad. I'm sure McCartney will be the same but it's Paul fucking McCartney. Although I do appreciate that the very same statement is the exact reason that some people will be elsewhere.

Someone time stamped the tunes, so click through.

I Turned it off at 1985, but listened to Let it be, I felt as sorry as I can for a multi millionaire who has enjoyed his life.

Edited by FuzzyDunlop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't GET The 1975.. Might have to give them a better listen... 

Don't think alot about wolf alice new album nor pete Dohertys.. But enjoyed London grammar... 

We get to listen to an album on the way to the hospital so getting through a few lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2018 at 1:13 PM, FloorFiller said:

Highly doubt they'd have both of them in the same high spots in one year, so I'm just gonna assume it'll be Liam due to his new found solo success rather than Noel who has dropped off somewhat.

while I've no doubt that Liam will be in a higher position than last time, I don't think he'll be subbing the Pyramid.

3rd Pyramid or Other sub is about as big as he can hope for IMO. i just don't think he has the "depth" for acts that have recently been booked in that slot.

 

could see Noel & HFB subbing the Pyramid though, enough solo hits and a few Oasis covers, and as big as plenty of other recent subs. don't think Noel has necessarily dropped off, but he's certainly plateaued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how left field this suggestion is but would love to see PJ Harvey given a chance to headline, perhaps Fri night for example. She's got a great back catalogue and she's still making new music altho not sure if she's planning on producing an entire new album. I know she's prob not big compared to Macca or AM, but she's certainly spice it up a bit. Her shows are incredible too
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MEGATRONICMEATWAGON said:

I don't know how left field this suggestion is but would love to see PJ Harvey given a chance to headline, perhaps Fri night for example. She's got a great back catalogue and she's still making new music altho not sure if she's planning on producing an entire new album. I know she's prob not big compared to Macca or AM, but she's certainly spice it up a bit. Her shows are incredible too
 

 

Considering the festival didn't think she was up to headlining the Other stage in 2016, I'd say that's incredibly unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Considering the festival didn't think she was up to headlining the Other stage in 2016, I'd say that's incredibly unlikely.

Ah I didn't go in 2016, so didn't know that. Shame really. I've seen her twice now and can't help feel she'd do a decent job. Perhaps a sub for AM then or the Cure.

BTW why are those 3 backed so much in the last few pages? Including Macca with that*

Edited by MEGATRONICMEATWAGON
Clarified Mccartney as the third rumour
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MEGATRONICMEATWAGON said:

Ah I didn't go in 2016, so didn't know that. Shame really. I've seen her twice now and can't help feel she'd do a decent job. Perhaps a sub for AM then or the Cure.

BTW why are those 3 backed so much in the last few pages?

She was good and could have easily headlined the stage. I don't think Pyramid headline was ever a goer, but they should have had her headlining Other.

Then again, LCD who actually headlined that stage were miles better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

She was good and could have easily headlined the stage. I don't think Pyramid headline was ever a goer, but they should have had her headlining Other.

Then again, LCD who actually headlined that stage were miles better.

I dunno about that. She got a pretty small/dead crowd subbing Other (though clashing her with Beck will surely have contributed to that).

Before she was confirmed for Other I'd have said she'd be 3rd Pyramid or JP/Park headliner. Those slots + Other sub seemed right for her, size-wise, but I just didn't think the was that suitable for Other. Subbing LCD worked nicely, though, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MEGATRONICMEATWAGON said:

Ah I didn't go in 2016, so didn't know that. Shame really. I've seen her twice now and can't help feel she'd do a decent job. Perhaps a sub for AM then or the Cure.

BTW why are those 3 backed so much in the last few pages? Including Macca with that*

Different sources giving Neil bits of info that suggest each of them, Cure and McCartney have got surrounding tour dates as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Definitely remember waiting to see if he'd manage his scream on Won't Get Fooled Again and it was a passable wallop at it.

I’m not sure if the scream is live; I’ve heard to the contrary, however I don’t care if so - it’s still great theatre. McCartney’s voice, like Daltrey’s, Plant’s etc, has changed and at times he sounds his age, however I can’t imagine not going to see him because his voice isn’t what it was. It’s still one of the greatest shows out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mouseboy11 said:

To be honest most Glastonbury headliners, especially recent ones anyway are about as safe as they come. The festival really isn’t as into taking risks with its headliners as people like to believe.

Kanye was the last risky one I suppose and look how that turned out.

agreed.

they had The Who cancel their own gig FFS rather than bump up Florence until they were forced to because of Dave Grohl's clumsiness, despite Emily making noises about female acts etc.

Kanye/Adele/Sheeran are megastars.

Mumford/Arcade Fire/Kasabian were all big at the time.

there hasn't been a genuine risk in a long time. even bumping up FATM initially wouldn't have been much of a risk really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ghostdancer1 said:

agreed.

they had The Who cancel their own gig FFS rather than bump up Florence until they were forced to because of Dave Grohl's clumsiness, despite Emily making noises about female acts etc.

Kanye/Adele/Sheeran are megastars.

Mumford/Arcade Fire/Kasabian were all big at the time.

there hasn't been a genuine risk in a long time. even bumping up FATM initially wouldn't have been much of a risk really.

Yeah until the first poster was released I was convinced Flo was gonna be the third headliner anyway. Wouldn't have been a risk at all and it was pretty lame that they didn't give her the slot.

I mean, fair enough, if they thought they were gonna get Foos/Kanye/Prince then they're not gonna pass any of them up (Foos are a boring headliner but given they'd never headlined Glasto you couldn't fault it as a booking - and the other two speak for themselves). But, assuming she was able and willing, giving the Sunday spot to The Who instead of Flo when it became apparent they couldn't secure Prince was shite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ghostdancer1 said:

agreed.

they had The Who cancel their own gig FFS rather than bump up Florence until they were forced to because of Dave Grohl's clumsiness, despite Emily making noises about female acts etc.

Kanye/Adele/Sheeran are megastars.

Mumford/Arcade Fire/Kasabian were all big at the time.

there hasn't been a genuine risk in a long time. even bumping up FATM initially wouldn't have been much of a risk really.

You can't blame them....a lot of people if they decided they didn't like enough of the headliners would probably not pay their balance and pull out. The fest can't afford not to have a sellout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Yokel Again said:

 

My preference would be to bump up rather than same acts every couple of years...

I can remember Coldplay headlining after 1 record, Travis after 2? 

Bump Wolf Alice up!

Not sure about Wolf Alice, but I definitely agree with the sentiment. It would be god to see an act get the bump up to headliner because of the quality of their live performance rather than the number of streams they've had, or because of the size of their presence on social media.

The only example of this I have personal experience of was Gogol Bordello headlining Bestival in 2006, they were still relatively unknown in the British mainstream, but they were (and possibly still are) an amazing live act. It would be nice if Glasto could do the same for some lesser known, acts

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, morph100 said:

Anyone think the cure could sub pyramid or headline other? Or are they purely pyramid headliner or not appearing?

I'd say they're purely Pyramid headliner. I know, the double-time slot at Bestival seems to bill them lower, and there is precedence for BST-booked headline acts appearing elsewhere at Glastonbury - but they're typically the acts we'd associate with the Legend slot, a la Paul Simon or Lionel Richie.

Given that I think the reception to booking The Cure in the Sunday afternoon would be rather strong, shall we say, I'd say it's atop the Pyramid or bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
21 minutes ago, morph100 said:

Anyone think the cure could sub pyramid or headline other? Or are they purely pyramid headliner or not appearing?

I reckon headliner only, because they won't do less. Bob Smith's tweet also said 'headlining' festivals.

But I do think they'd be better suited to the Other Stage with Glastonbury's audience which won't be hardcore Cure fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, morph100 said:

Anyone think the cure could sub pyramid or headline other? Or are they purely pyramid headliner or not appearing?

It's a question of why would they agree to play anywhere else. They would headline any other festival so it's a cert that if they play then they would headline. 

It's always been a bit strange with The Cure though as they aren't precious about what festivals they play. They will often headline the small/medium festivals as well as the large ones so it's hard to judge how big they are.

How quick they sold out BST and with Glastonbury often having acts from BST would also suggest they would headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ghostdancer1 said:

while I've no doubt that Liam will be in a higher position than last time, I don't think he'll be subbing the Pyramid.

3rd Pyramid or Other sub is about as big as he can hope for IMO. i just don't think he has the "depth" for acts that have recently been booked in that slot.

 

could see Noel & HFB subbing the Pyramid though, enough solo hits and a few Oasis covers, and as big as plenty of other recent subs. don't think Noel has necessarily dropped off, but he's certainly plateaued.

I can’t see Liam personally doing anything but sub the Pyramid, he has had a great run off his solo album, a sold out arena tour last December and then a sold out Finsbury Park and LCCC in Manchester as well as Parklife, IOW and TRNSMT. That’s quite the run of shows and a hell of a lot of people.

love or hate the man, he’s been very popular this year and last. 

Cant think of any band in the past few years of Glastonbury that have quite achieved that much and been anything less than subbing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...