Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

Just now, DeanoL said:

Hoped to be. Even had this roadmap been announced 1 Jan I don't think it would have given a festival the size of Glastonbury the guarantees they really need. It does make the rest of the festival season and smaller festivals much more likely though.

Yeah and even one slight delay on all of this would ruin it. Reading must be pretty hopeful though- if all adults are vaccinated by end of July then the 3 weeks has kicked in by Bank Holiday weekend in August. I can see it being the first normal festival to be honest 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Radiochicken said:

Soooooooooo can Glastonbury like ermmmm un-cancel now?!

Fantastic news all round. But don't forget that the possibility still exists of some kind of delay for whatever reason. 

Cutting it a bit fine for G if there was even a weeks delay but pretty much looking forward to EoTR and Beardy now (consecutive weekends will be a killer).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

gyms normal with no distancing ? 

"All newly open settings must abide by the social contact rules. The Government will continue to enforce restrictions and require businesses to demonstrate robust strategies for managing the risk of transmission and to ensure social distancing rules are followed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, efcfanwirral said:

Yeah and even one slight delay on all of this would ruin it. Reading must be pretty hopeful though- if all adults are vaccinated by end of July then the 3 weeks has kicked in by Bank Holiday weekend in August. I can see it being the first normal festival to be honest 

When I went to reading there weren't that many actual adults there 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnson says four reviews will also be carried out.

They will cover: the case for Covid status certificates; how events can be staged; how travel can be facilitated; and social distancing.

And he says next month the government will publish a plan for dealing with local outbreak and variants of concern.

He ends by saying it is important to be cautious, and humble in the face of the virus. But the end is in sight, he claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Radiochicken said:

Soooooooooo can Glastonbury like ermmmm un-cancel now?!

trouble is, still can't say for sure of all restrictions will be lifted on 21st June...has to meet these 4 tests...so without insurance able to cover a late cancellation still not possible for Glastonbury really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

I know you are joking but 21st June is only if the conditions allow they couldn’t have run a festival in that level of uncertainty sadly. Their decision to cancel was the right one. 

Even if the numbers match last June 21st 2020 when we didnt have a vaccine it would mean the restrictions being lifted... there was hardly any deaths or hospitalisations....  I would hazard a guess this year, with a vaccine the virus will be virtually non-existent. 

I think the levels will be low enough to open sooner.... but they wont lift everything, there appears to be no flexibility. 

These are just all my personal predictions obviously. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the festival want to be cautious but they have planned for the next festival for almost 2 years now, if they could get the insurance to cover cancellation. There is plenty of time to reboot the machine for June..

I'd happily pay a non-refundable fee for the chance to go this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...