Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

The 1975 2020


Mash011

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Madyaker said:

Are you serious? Can see this going down well on the pyramid alright ?? Atrocious

 

This is actually terrible. 

The one where he's trying to do some sort of indie Marilyn Manson is at least better than that. Even it it does suggest that, fuck me, rock is dead. 

 

Edited by Sasperella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I quite like that people tune to be honest.

Guitar sounds a bit like the Hives to me. 

It isnt gunna change my life, but Ive added it to a spotify playlist. Never thought I'd say that about The 1975.

However the video @Madyaker posted has just given me a bit of a rash. Horrible.

 

Edited by FuzzyDunlop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest mystery to me is how they can invoke any kind of strong reaction. They’re not terrible - the last couple of videos in this thread I’ve quite enjoyed. So I’m baffled at people ranting about how awful they are. I’m also a bit bewildered at how anybody can think they’re great. I mean, they clearly believe they are, but I listen to their music and think ‘fair enough’ then go and listen to something I enjoy more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kalifire said:

The biggest mystery to me is how they can invoke any kind of strong reaction. They’re not terrible - the last couple of videos in this thread I’ve quite enjoyed. So I’m baffled at people ranting about how awful they are. I’m also a bit bewildered at how anybody can think they’re great. I mean, they clearly believe they are, but I listen to their music and think ‘fair enough’ then go and listen to something I enjoy more. 

Their audience, The young kids think they are great. However, the kids don’t realise that the 1975 aren’t exactly doing anything new. 

Read the YouTube comments on People it should give you a flavour about the 1975’s audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kalifire said:

The biggest mystery to me is how they can invoke any kind of strong reaction. They’re not terrible - the last couple of videos in this thread I’ve quite enjoyed. So I’m baffled at people ranting about how awful they are. I’m also a bit bewildered at how anybody can think they’re great. I mean, they clearly believe they are, but I listen to their music and think ‘fair enough’ then go and listen to something I enjoy more. 

Simply because they're so popular right now. Loads of the bands that are the biggest targets for criticism on here are the ones that are particularly popular. Nobody is going to bother complaining all the time about really bad bands like Don Broco, they'll save it for okay but overrated (by the outside world) bands like the 1975 and Coldplay (though at least Coldplay have some really strong early material).  I can empathise with it, they're not particularly talented or interesting, the only reason many of us pay them any attention is because they're so popular and headlining festivals that we all talk about. I only listened to their new song out of curiosity because of the hype around them atm (and I guess because I think they'll headline Glastonbury next year) but whilst the others sound pretty average to me (except Love It If We Made It which is pretty catchy), this one is actually abysmal and I did what you did and quickly moved on to something else. They're average, but they're a talking point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have the albums. The audience. Stage presence. Visual elements. Like them or hate them they could easily headline. I used to be a big fan, not so much these days with the scream one direction-esque kiddy fans.

I still think it's mad how they came out with a few singles before and didn't get the response they needed the first time around. Quickly disappeared. Few years later they re-released 'Sex' and the rest is history. Strange how things work out, right place right time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ghostdancer1 said:

what performance? there's nothing about that utterly dreadful Corden clip that says headliners. It's embarrassingly bad.

I think that person is talking about their Reading Festival headline slot.

And they absolutely smashed it. As they did when they headlined Latitude in 2017. 

They’re totally ready to headline Glastonbury (to be honest, they were ready to do it this year)

Edited by aidenlangan95
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ghostdancer1 said:

what performance? there's nothing about that utterly dreadful Corden clip that says headliners. It's embarrassingly bad.

I second this. Sure, they prepared some stage visuals, but 80% of them were just images of rectangles.

 

if they could just replace Matty Healy with someone less self-aware then I’d give them a go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, kalifire said:

The biggest mystery to me is how they can invoke any kind of strong reaction. They’re not terrible - the last couple of videos in this thread I’ve quite enjoyed. So I’m baffled at people ranting about how awful they are. I’m also a bit bewildered at how anybody can think they’re great. I mean, they clearly believe they are, but I listen to their music and think ‘fair enough’ then go and listen to something I enjoy more. 

Usually when opinion is split like this it means they've atleast got something about them to get people paying attention!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, aidenlangan95 said:

I think that person is talking about their Reading Festival headline slot.

And they absolutely smashed it. As they did when they headlined Latitude in 2017. 

They’re totally ready to headline Glastonbury (to be honest, they were ready to do it this year)

People are very quick to throw around "smashed it" for a headline set I feel.

Watched some iplayer and it just cemented my opinion, in line with @kalifire - just "eh, okay". I'm sure if you're a fan it was fantastic, and yeah there's loads of singing along and the Reading crowd looked in to it, but it didn't persuade me to think they're anything more than an okay band that have tapped in to the youth crowd.

As I mentioned a few pages ago - they are ready and absolutely will headline Glastonbury soon if not next year. They will need to do something more exciting for me to go and see them though (and I already gave them a miss at MC).

18 hours ago, ghostdancer1 said:

that new one is doing nothing to dissuade me from the view that everything they do is a cynical ploy, although for what ends I have no idea. Song is shite fwiw.

A song fully in Mandarin on the next album wouldn't surprise me one bit.

I don't think they're a shite band by any means, but yeah I completely get the cynical plot thing. It feels very disingenuous, but hey, it's working for them. And if they get more people acting on issues like climate change then power to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, D-Low said:

They have the albums. The audience. Stage presence. Visual elements. Like them or hate them they could easily headline. I used to be a big fan, not so much these days with the scream one direction-esque kiddy fans.

I still think it's mad how they came out with a few singles before and didn't get the response they needed the first time around. Quickly disappeared. Few years later they re-released 'Sex' and the rest is history. Strange how things work out, right place right time.

They love to tell the story about how they couldn’t even get booked for Reading as recently as 2012. Going from that to last night in seven years is a dictionary definition of perseverance paying off.

That said, People is - sonically - probably my least favourite thing they’ve ever done, so I hope they don’t make any more like that.

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2019 at 10:31 AM, Matt42 said:

Their audience, The young kids think they are great. However, the kids don’t realise that the 1975 aren’t exactly doing anything new. 

Read the YouTube comments on People it should give you a flavour about the 1975’s audience.

This. They’re the kind of band you listen to when you’re 12 and just getting into music. Then 10 years later you look back and wonder how you ever listened to that shite. Maybe they will headline and more power to them if they do but I won’t be watching. And if they get a few kids listening to guitar music for life that’s surely a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Madyaker said:

This. They’re the kind of band you listen to when you’re 12 and just getting into music. Then 10 years later you look back and wonder how you ever listened to that shite. Maybe they will headline and more power to them if they do but I won’t be watching. And if they get a few kids listening to guitar music for life that’s surely a good thing.

Some bands manage to stay in that position for a long time and it does quite well for them.

i.e a day to remember sub headlining a major UK festival in 2019. I didn’t realise they even had fans in the UK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2019 at 2:50 PM, ghostdancer1 said:

that new one is doing nothing to dissuade me from the view that everything they do is a cynical ploy, although for what ends I have no idea. Song is shite fwiw.

A song fully in Mandarin on the next album wouldn't surprise me one bit.

 

 

Haha. Agreed. They’re like one of these fictional bands that play the prom in some film about high school in america but somehow they came out of the screen and now exist in reality... sadly.

Bland, cheshire band incapable of being original and I think they are both aware and insecure about it, hence all the tragic effort put in to be ’different’ and dramatise what is at its core.. very dull.

The hollyoaks of bands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...