Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, TGCarr said:

Hmmm that really is a stacked day.

 

i personally can’t see how they can’t sub if it’s below Elton 

Unless Lizzo is headlining Other opposite GNR

although…. She 100% deserves to be on that pyramid stage

Edited by sisco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

It got blown off when Lisa Fischer took her solo on Gimme Shelter.

Watching it back on TV you can see her and Mick properly pick up on the crowd reaction to her solo. Think he even mentions it when they’re doing the band intros later. They got momentum from there.

Think Wild Horses was soon after and I loved that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FloorFiller said:

They’re in an weird too big to sub/too small to headline position so outside of them doing a secret set, which is a very real possibility tbf,I can’t see where they’d fit in. 

image.thumb.jpeg.a4fd40e90f405c09990b7b6e05d0d647.jpeg

 

That’s not the poster position of a band too big to sub Glastonbury. I mean look at the acts that are their “equals” on this poster and look at the acts one line above them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, assorted said:

image.thumb.jpeg.a4fd40e90f405c09990b7b6e05d0d647.jpeg

 

That’s not the poster position of a band too big to sub Glastonbury. I mean look at the acts that are their “equals” on this poster and look at the acts one line above them...

the 1975 are way bigger in England though.

Rosalia is headlining Primavera but she wouldn't headline Glastonbury, at least not at the moment 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

glastonbury sells out without an act being announced because up to now, punters can realistically expect three top-notch headliners and a top notch line-up across the rest.  looks like they've spoilt that this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Neil said:

glastonbury sells out without an act being announced because up to now, punters can realistically expect three top-notch headliners and a top notch line-up across the rest.  looks like they've spoilt that this year.

We don't know if it'll be a top notch lineup across the rest yet but history would suggest they won't let us down (there are some great names being suggested), even if the combined headline trio don't live up to usual high standards/expectations. It'll be fine. Maybe this is the year of the stacked undercard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

We don't know if it'll be a top notch lineup across the rest yet but history would suggest they won't let us down (there are some great names being suggested), even if the combined headline trio don't live up to usual high standards/expectations. It'll be fine. Maybe this is the year of the stacked undercard?

My faith in them is jaded too much of the line-up is too pop for this old codger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Skip997 said:

I was in the field for about 15/20 minutes. They were poor, I left. Public Enemy were superb.

Lemmy once said the Stones are a great studio band, but a bad live act. Reckon he knows more than me.

When Lemmy played he was younger than the Stones and didn't even know what song he was supposed to be playing. Mick and the lads were incredible, my favourite ever gig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, assorted said:

image.thumb.jpeg.a4fd40e90f405c09990b7b6e05d0d647.jpeg

 

That’s not the poster position of a band too big to sub Glastonbury. I mean look at the acts that are their “equals” on this poster and look at the acts one line above them..

Look at 1975s UK tour against Machine Gun Kelly, or the black keys. They are bigger than both in the UK. Headlined Reading. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Neil said:

glastonbury sells out without an act being announced because up to now, punters can realistically expect three top-notch headliners and a top notch line-up across the rest.  looks like they've spoilt that this year.

Sorry Neil you're just wrong on this one lad. I know you don't like em, but it is arguably the BIGGEST trio ever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, gigpusher said:

I genuinely don’t know anyone who has actually seen Elton John do a live show last year who thought he was awful. I have even seen people say they went not especially liking him because they got a free ticket and they really enjoyed him. That’s actually why I am quite excited about him. His live reputation seems pretty solid. I am not a huge fan. I have never bought an album by him, said just yesterday I would not pay to see him live but he’s a fantastic booking for the festival. 

He was FUCKING FANTASTIC in June.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Neil said:

glastonbury sells out without an act being announced because up to now, punters can realistically expect three top-notch headliners and a top notch line-up across the rest.  looks like they've spoilt that this year.

That’s just complete nonsense. 

I can’t even be bothered to elaborate as everyone has a thousand times. You’re just stuck in a loop because you don’t like them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've absolutely no doubt that Glasto will sell out in the resale in no time at all yet again, with or without a GnR announcement.

Though if some people want to give their ticket back on the basis of one booking then that's great for the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, stuie said:

That’s just complete nonsense. 

I can’t even be bothered to elaborate as everyone has a thousand times. You’re just stuck in a loop because i don't think they're not worthy of it.

corrected for you.

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neil said:

glastonbury sells out without an act being announced because up to now, punters can realistically expect three top-notch headliners and a top notch line-up across the rest.  looks like they've spoilt that this year.

By that reasoning, it will not sell out instantly it goes on sale, next year.

I bet it will.

I am honestly getting bored with this now. I get it, you don’t like GNR, but from a guy that wrote Prince off as ‘bad heavy metal’ I’d be generous enough to say that your taste does not jibe with that of the general public. Get over it. Enjoy yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...