Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Hugh Jass II said:

To be fair The 1975 are most definitely in the Foals/Biffy corridor of uncertainty.

It’s a bit like going bald, eventually you just have to accept it and suddenly life becomes much happier.

I've accepted that I'm keeping my hair. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taylor is a capitalist psychopath (and one of my favourite artists) and will do it if she can see a tangible benefit it in doing it, whether that's breaking some sort of record or surprise dropping an album around it. Like Beyonce, I just can't see her doing it as a random one off stop in amongst some tour dates anymore.

When you're the biggest artist in the world (whose star has ascended even further the past year) and can sell out any stadium on any continent, is schlepping to a festival where nobody's specifically bought a ticket to see you, you get paid a pittance, can't have a full production that you're used to and don't get full control over the broadcast element really something she'd be interested in? I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, jannybruck said:

 

When you're the biggest artist in the world (whose star has ascended even further the past year) and can sell out any stadium on any continent, is schlepping to a festival where nobody's specifically bought a ticket to see you, you get paid a pittance, can't have a full production that you're used to and don't get full control over the broadcast element really something she'd be interested in? I don't know.

She was interested in it three years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

She's way less of beady-eyed bean counter than Mick Jagger, and we know she's actually been to the festival

I don't believe we do know that?

Unless I missed something from last year, the only suggestion along those lines that I can remember was that someone was convinced he saw her near the Cider Bus at Glastonbury 2019.

Which given it was near the Cider Bus, and wasn't corroborated by anyone/anything else, I'm inclined to put down to being a drunken hallucination.

The photo is from some awards ceremony in early 2020. NME or Brit I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Said before that it’s naive and unrealistic to expect note perfect performances from heritage acts whose vocal chords have suffered the ravages of aging, over use and/or massive substance abuse.

Even if Axl sounds like that video or Reg is in full Dill Danding mode will it matter when it’s all going off in that field? Would anyone even notice?

Most of my experiences are of getting swept up in the moments, not stroking my chin and bemoaning the audio quality…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, topmarksbri said:

Ok, any decent clips of them recently to change minds?

Granted this is six years ago now so not the best example, but here’s Axl when he briefly toured with AC/DC and it’s clear that his voice, whilst still sounding a little rough and raspy, is far more powerful here than the almost whisper he’s doing in that Sweet Child O’ Mind video:

He’s detailed how he had vocal problems and illness last year and it seems he was really trying to conserve his voice so that it didn’t blow out early in the set, but when he’s on form he can still belt out the bangers, so fingers crossed he’s fully recovered come this summer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...