Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Lizzo is a target for the far right. The fash fucking hate her. Solidarity is absolutely the right move in this case.

Yep plus she seems essentially good. Nothing I have read about her and I have read a lot suggests she’s a horrible person who treats people badly. A slightly imperfect person who occasionally makes mistakes but who isn’t one of those! On balance I think she does way more good in the world. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

For clarity I absolutely do not fall into the above group.

Didn’t think you did but every time you read a report of divaish behaviour it’s worth remembering who might be behind it plus diva on its own is problematic because straight men are rarely accused of being it. They are perfectionists instead! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mouseboy11 said:

Personally I think the only other act that’s around and realistic I’d have liked to see headline is The Weeknd, and he doesn’t seem to be doing any festivals with his setup so.

Would love The Weeknd to play at some point. He is one of the artists who for me, justifies the ticket price. Unfortunately I don't think it'll be 2023 or 2024 so might have to wait for what ever the 3rd part of this current 'trilogy' of albums is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The festival have never gone for ‘edgy’ bookings as headliners, and anyone thinking they did is using the red coloured specs. They have almost always gone for the biggest popular acts they can get. Jay-z was seen as edgy because of genre, but he was one of the biggest hip hop acts in the world. Stormzy, maybe but he had number singles by the time he headlined, so hardly a big stretch. 

it’s fine if you don’t like the current trio, but moaning that the fest is somehow all of a sudden going for popular and safe choices is not really the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gigpusher said:

Didn’t think you did but every time you read a report of divaish behaviour it’s worth remembering who might be behind it plus diva on its own is problematic because straight men are rarely accused of being it. They are perfectionists instead! 

Wise words. 

As you say, it was a very minor thing that was resolved within a day, but got a lot of airtime hence people are aware years later. 

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/lizzo-apology-postmates-twitter_n_5d825007e4b0957256afc453

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, FrancisH said:

lot of people here struggling with the idea of a forum and differing opinions and that not everyone is buzzing for guns and roses.

was pretty clear to caveat my stuff with "in my opinion" but feel like that should go without saying on a forum.

“You don’t like the headliners? Here’s some stats about how big they are to convince you that you’re wrong”.

The main points that put me off the headliners are (a) it’s not very diverse and limited in genre, (b) all three of them have shit live reputations or are clearly past it.

We aren’t going to get anything like a show from Macca or Kendrick this year. It’s hard to get excited about it. Especially nothing like Billies.

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

“You don’t like the headliners? Here’s some stats about how big they are to convince you that you’re wrong”.

The main points that put me off the headliners are (a) it’s not very diverse and limited in genre, (b) all three of them have shit live reputations or are clearly past it.

We aren’t going to get anything like a show from Macca or Kendrick this year. It’s hard to get excited about it. Especially nothing like Billies.

2 out of 3 I’d agree have a bad reputation live but Elton?? I am not a huge Elton fan by any means but I have had at least 10 people tell me who have seen him live recently say that he is great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheDayman said:

 

"Your transgressions can become your greatest blessings, bitch"

 

 

 

Someday I'll hunt down the owner of the big chequered flag who was waving it in front of the sound desk cameras.....doesn't completely fuck up the footage but it's an irritant when wanting to re-run one of the all time great Glastonbury performances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

2 out of 3 I’d agree have a bad reputation live but Elton?? I am not a huge Elton fan by any means but I have had at least 10 people tell me who have seen him live recently say that he is great. 

Elton's alleged shit live reputation isn't coming from people who've seen him live, just from people trying to make a meme out of I'm Dill Danding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

“You don’t like the headliners? Here’s some stats about how big they are to convince you that you’re wrong”.

The main points that put me off the headliners are (a) it’s not very diverse and limited in genre, (b) all three of them have shit live reputations or are clearly past it.

We aren’t going to get anything like a show from Macca or Kendrick this year. It’s hard to get excited about it. Especially nothing like Billies.

Honestly this is it summed up perfectly (minus Elton IMO, I think that has the potential to be v good)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Someday I'll hunt down the owner of the big chequered flag who was waving it in front of the sound desk cameras.....doesn't completely fuck up the footage but it's an irritant when wanting to re-run one of the all time great Glastonbury performances.

Can we get the headliner arguments wrapped up before we start in on the ‘ban flags’ debate…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

all three of them have shit live reputations or are clearly past it.

That’s an exaggeration at best, except for GnR.

Seems like you’re in ‘I don’t like them so I’ll argue they’re weak’ mode. 

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Elton's alleged shit live reputation isn't coming from people who've seen him live, just from people trying to make a meme out of I'm Dill Danding.

Exactly and Paul McCartney’s performance at that wasn’t exactly fabulous either. One of the reasons I am so excited to see him is based on great live reviews from people I trust knowing I would never go to see him otherwise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gigpusher said:

2 out of 3 I’d agree have a bad reputation live but Elton?? I am not a huge Elton fan by any means but I have had at least 10 people tell me who have seen him live recently say that he is great. 

Sounds like someone’s fucking nan on the piano after a few too many sherrys at Xmas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...