Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Cherry Tree said:

I have posted this previously, this is what the tories wanted to portray in 2015, the reality in 2017 was quite different. Not saying they won’t use the same scare tactics.

 

5DEC4A81-DF2D-47DD-838C-B0CC4E8D2A18.jpeg

CB9632CB-34B4-42C9-B57E-ED1803410BF5.jpeg

The thing is Miliband explained how to deal with this at the weird not a debate successive Question Time special in 2015. You don't make any deals you just put forward a program of government and dare them to vote it down.  The SNP have huge leads up here but they wouldn't want to be seen as stopping Labour getting in and leading to a Tory government. It wouldn't be the most stable of governments and it may well not last a full term but whilst the SNP would have the power to bring the government down they'd never really want to be seen as doing it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some 2000 page stats .....

Top posters

@steviewevie  5808 posts 

@Ozanne Kier 4423posts 

Sir Crazyfool 4236 posts  ( awarded in the new years honours for services to when will this shit end thread 

Top posts 

with this ....

@jparx

"I think on a music festival message board it’s a legitimate question to ask. It doesn’t suggest the OP doesn’t give a shit about anything else.

Of course there are much bigger things to be worried about, but that doesn’t mean you can’t also miss live music."

with a massive 37 upvotes 

 

This thread has been viewed 1.8 million times ......and has had 50 k replies 

thanks to all contributors ... its been a roller coaster and massive thanks to @Toilet Duck for responses to all our quoting ... 

 

 

Edited by crazyfool1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, xxialac said:


Won't it be strange when we're all past the ending of this shit. 
 

Probably be even stranger now to find a house that's very small with woodchip on the wall when you come round to call.

16 minutes ago, Losing my hair said:

By the time we reach page 3000 we'll all be living underwater. 

Maybe that's Plan U on how to successfully socially distance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

Some 2000 page stats .....

Top posters

@steviewevie  5808 posts 

@Ozanne Kier 4423posts 

Sir Crazyfool 4236 posts 

Top posts 

with this ....

@jparx

 

"I think on a music festival message board it’s a legitimate question to ask. It doesn’t suggest the OP doesn’t give a shit about anything else.

Of course there are much bigger things to be worried about, but that doesn’t mean you can’t also miss live music."

with a massive 37 upvotes 

 

This thread has been viewed 1.8 million times ......and has had 50 k replies 

thanks to all contributors ... its been a roller coaster and massive thanks to @Toilet Duck for responses to all our quoting ... 

 

 

do I get a prize?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ShakeyCrash said:

Yep, these days i think the bar is that you have to kill someone in order to quit from politics. And even then it depends on whether they deserved it or not

He did try running over a cyclist a few months ago, caused minor injuries. Typical Starmer, uncommitted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...