Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

Just now, NorthernSoul52 said:

It's certainly got a strong line in comedy for me, particularly given we'll have figured out the bigger names by process of elimination or sheer dumb luck at that point.

Usually the case though innit. By the time of the poster there are only ever truly a handful of genuine surprises that noone saw coming. Katy Perry and Mikey Cyrus would be two examples.

That's the trade-off when you keep your ear to the ground by lingering around this place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Usually the case though innit. By the time of the poster there are only ever truly a handful of genuine surprises that noone saw coming. Katy Perry and Mikey Cyrus would be two examples.

That's the trade-off when you keep your ear to the ground by lingering around this place.

My favourite is when people on here get upset that there's little to no surprises on the poster and they've posted multiple times a day on this forum since tickets went on sale. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

And the band have since tried to distance themselves from it and it was removed from a recent reissue.

Axl's response was pretty dismal, though. He initially came out defending it:

Quote

Why can black people go up to each other and say, 'Nigger,' but when a white guy does it all of a sudden it's a big putdown? I don't like boundaries of any kind. I don't like being told what I can and what I can't say. I used the word 'nigger' because it's a word to describe somebody that is basically a pain in your life, a problem.

Then he later softened his defence:

Quote

I was pissed off about some black people that were trying to rob me ... I wanted to insult those particular black people

But it's still a shit defence. To my knowledge he's never apologised. Very happy to be corrected.

Regarding his homophobia, he's described himself as "pro-heterosexual" and offered:

Quote

I'm not against them doing what they want to do as long as it's not hurting anybody else and they're not forcing it upon me

Which is the kind of latent, passive-aggressive abuse classic of homophobes.

Maybe he's more recently lamented his years as a racist, homophobic w*nker. I'm not aware if he has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, chazwwe said:

My favourite is when people on here get upset that there's little to no surprises on the poster and they've posted multiple times a day on this forum since tickets went on sale. 

"I'm bored of discussing the Taylor Swift rumour ever day, I want a curveball"

"Taylor Swift isn't playing and has been replaced by Guns'n'Roses"

"Not like that!"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Meerkat said:

Wow, is that a coincidence or deliberate?

Never knew that

Deliberate.  Guess he thought it was cool/clever back in the early 80's.  In fairness, trying to imagine the peer group back then, it was probably deemed so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

"I'm bored of discussing the Taylor Swift rumour ever day, I want a curveball"

"Taylor Swift isn't playing and has been replaced by Guns'n'Roses"

"Not like that!"

 

It's the main reason I don't bother speculating on the headliners.  I couldn't actually tell you what I do want in that slot, so I don't really end up with anything to add as I've got no response to the question of "well what would you prefer?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Quark said:

It's the main reason I don't bother speculating on the headliners.  I couldn't actually tell you what I do want in that slot, so I don't really end up with anything to add as I've got no response to the question of "well what would you prefer?"

In an ideal world you want a mixture of acts you dearly love and wouldn't miss for the world and acts who are huge/interesting but you probably wouldn't shell out £150+ to see in a football stadium.  Reg probably ticks the first one for me.  GNR maybe the second.  AM not so much.

Harry Styles & Dua Lipa would be squarely in the second category for me and I would undoubtedly watch both.  Radiohead would tick box one (I know, I know...) but there aren't many acts still active that would be big enough to headline and that I'm mad passionate about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

In an ideal world you want a mixture of acts you dearly love and wouldn't miss for the world and acts who are huge/interesting but you probably wouldn't shell out £150+ to see in a football stadium.  Reg probably ticks the first one for me.  GNR maybe the second.  AM not so much.

Harry Styles & Dua Lipa would be squarely in the second category for me and I would undoubtedly watch both.  Radiohead would tick box one (I know, I know...) but there aren't many acts still active that would be big enough to headline and that I'm mad passionate about.

 I think this is where I struggle. My list of must-sees that are headliner-level is non-existent now.  I'm not hugely fussed about any repeat viewings at Glastonbury, and almost all of the bands over my lifetime that I've really wanted to see, I've seen.

The only two exceptions I can think of would be REM (I've mentioned them in the dream lineup conversations, seen them once but not at Glastonbury) and Metallica (the only one of my "big acts" that I've never see at all).

REM will never reform and I very much doubt that Metallica will be a repeat Glastonbury headliner, so it's a slim field for me.

The undercard & smaller stages, that's where I could start reeling off dream bookings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'd like:

One act I love and am excited to see on the Pyramid. Hello GnR.

One act I'm interested in seeing, wouldn't normally bother but will be a very good night if nothing else drags me away. Hello Elton.

One act I have zero interest in to make sure I spend at least one night away from The Pyramid but I recognise is a good booking for the festival. Hello Arctic Monkeys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

I think I'd like:

One act I love and am excited to see on the Pyramid. Hello GnR.

One act I'm interested in seeing, wouldn't normally bother but will be a very good night if nothing else drags me away. Hello Elton.

One act I have zero interest in to make sure I spend at least one night away from The Pyramid but I recognise is a good booking for the festival. Hello Arctic Monkeys.

You can see GnR. In the legend slot.

Harry Styles / AM / Elton John.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JoeyT said:

You can see GnR. In the legend slot.

Harry Styles / AM / Elton John.

Harry Styles is just so bland though.

I'll concede that the first thing he brought out (Sign Of The Times?) was ok but everything else I've heard by him is just horrifically meh. I can't comprehend his popularity beyond the old 1D fans who like to have a bit of a swoon at him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...