Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

AM, GNR, Liam, Roxy makes me think that things have gone horribly wrong and there’s probably been some very intense meetings in the office.

it really does look like cost of living glastonbury though

I'm still not having Roxy Music in that slot.

Keep the faith, everyone. Loads of festivals across Europe have still yet to pull the trigger on the big name announcements. It's coming. They won't let us down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

I'm still not having Roxy Music in that slot.

Keep the faith, everyone. Loads of festivals across Europe have still yet to pull the trigger on the big name announcements. It's coming. They won't let us down.

Correct, whilst we can speculate and try and read between lines I reckon there’s a nice surprise or two in the pipeline. Probably Roxy will play but possibly not in the legends. 

Edited by Ayrshire Chris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ayrshire Chris said:

Correct, whilst we can speculate and try and read between lines I reckon there’s a nice surprise or two in the pipeline. 

This is the festival that pulled Kendrick out of the bag in June, when no one else had him. And it was stunning. There might be the odd faux pas now and again, but as I've said before, 9 times out of 10, they get it right from what's available to them.

There's definitely some mileage in the thoughts that securing suitable headliners may be proving difficult this time round. I wonder if the budget cap has become more restrictive than ever. There's a lot of artists and acts who went two years with little income, looking to (rightly) make up for those losses. There's also a load of greedy c**ts too, mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Lizzo is not headliner material (yet), but surely she'd be a better booking than Liam fucking Gallagher? Although I don't think I could take all the 'woke booking' whining for the next 4 years. 

If Liam Gallagher is the bar ... can't we get The XX or Royal Blood? Or some other not big enough British band who would love a bump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Festival Liam said:

I know Lizzo is not headliner material (yet), but surely she'd be a better booking than Liam fucking Gallagher? Although I don't think I could take all the 'woke booking' whining for the next 4 years. 

If Liam Gallagher is the bar ... can't we get The XX or Royal Blood? Or some other not big enough British band who would love a bump. 

Royal Blood headlining Glastonbury…. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leath02 said:

Back online

Liam now down to 3/1

Yep, spotted.

Reckon we can all just REALLLLLLY cross our fingers and get a one-off Oasis reunion? That with a spot of Blur and Pulp... go for the full Brit Pop effect?

 

EDIT: Also, these are apparently from the future. The person has set the date as 1st December 2022. lol

Edited by WhatADin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jannybruck said:

The "well it's the most well respected festival in the world, huge money-can't-buy promo for any artist, they can get any headliner they want because it's Glastonbury and who wouldn't" narrative potentially getting eroded to smithereens over the course of a few months has been bleakly hilarious.

People want paying 

Imagine that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, CiaranMc said:

Was gonna say the only way you’d get me to the Pyramid field to watch Liam would be if his special guests were Noel, Guigsy, Bonehead, and Alan White.

Almost certainly still wouldn't bother.

14 minutes ago, Festival Liam said:

I know Lizzo is not headliner material (yet), but surely she'd be a better booking than Liam fucking Gallagher? Although I don't think I could take all the 'woke booking' whining for the next 4 years. 

Yes she would and I reckon would be a great headliner.  All the "not big enough" talk doesn't wash with me.  She's got a great back catalogue, new album is fanfuckingtastic and she's an awesome live performer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...