Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

Just now, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

I have the option if driving to Cornwall for a pint I don't - because it would be irresponsible and I want to return to normality as quickly as possible for EVERYONE. 

 

Ok great I admire your outlook on that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

I have the option if driving to Cornwall for a pint I don't - because it would be irresponsible and I want to return to normality as quickly as possible for EVERYONE. 

 

It’s a fallacy that we’ll get back to normal if we all just follow the rules 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

I guess in the end, when you peel back these made up societal constructs, we're just a bunch of savage animals.

This is extremely hyperbolic. Ah an early 20s young adult living in probably a small flat in London opting not to spend Christmas alone is a ‘savage animal’. You sound like a daily mail reader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bovla said:

I am one of the selfish people who left London last night, and to be honest I feel pretty bad about having done it.

I live in a flat with my girlfriend who had planned all along to go back with her parents yesterday and they were on their way when the news broke. I then panicked and just said I'd go with her. In hindsight, we probably should have both told her parents to turn around. And if they were picking her up today or next week I would probably argue for us to stay put. But it happened so quickly yesterday and it was as bleak as news has been since march which scared us I think. 

I am not proud of what we've done and feel guilty about any potential damage we have done. I also feel selfish as many people in similar situations will be abiding by the rules and staying put in small London flats instead of moving back to be with parents etc. But I want to enjoy Christmas and not feel guilty the whole time so hopefully I come to accept it.

I guess I just want to express that all those people who left London last night are to some some extent 'selfish' but these are special circumstances and we do have to have sympathy for everyone at this time. No-one is enjoying this and we all need support, not finger pointing

Good post and well done for showing some humility. These are all extremely tough decisions and not easy for anyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

There probably is a national spread now after the great getaway of 19/12/2020. 

Irrespective of that, you could not have been more wrong in your original assertion. You just don't seem that willing to admit it.

Just deflection tactics now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

This is extremely hyperbolic. Ah an early 20s young adult living in probably a small flat in London opting not to spend Christmas alone is a ‘savage animal’. You sound like a daily mail reader.

You've made the small flat point several times now. If it's ok to live in for the other 364 days a year why is it suddenly too small on Christmas day can I ask? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now we actually are the international pariah that some refused to accept we might be treated as:

"Netherlands bans flights from UK due to fast-spreading coronavirus

Dutch government says it will consider further restrictions on travel from Britain to limit spread of new strain."

https://www.politico.eu/article/netherlands-flight-travel-ban-uk-coronavirus-england-airports/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

You've made the small flat point several times now. If it's ok to live in for the other 364 days a year why is it suddenly too small on Christmas day can I ask? 

Ah - the Christmas is a load of nothing gaslighting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me - people are selfish and however much want to pretend we’re the best possible human going will always make decisions which are best for them/ourselves.

However......  these government decisions were made to keep people in the place they currently are.  Don’t go travelling across the country and then come back moaning that things like Glastonbury aren’t happening.  Don’t be that hypocrite. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Bovla said:

I am one of the selfish people who left London last night, and to be honest I feel pretty bad about having done it.

I live in a flat with my girlfriend who had planned all along to go back with her parents yesterday and they were on their way when the news broke. I then panicked and just said I'd go with her. In hindsight, we probably should have both told her parents to turn around. And if they were picking her up today or next week I would probably argue for us to stay put. But it happened so quickly yesterday and it was as bleak as news has been since march which scared us I think. 

I am not proud of what we've done and feel guilty about any potential damage we have done. I also feel selfish as many people in similar situations will be abiding by the rules and staying put in small London flats instead of moving back to be with parents etc. But I want to enjoy Christmas and not feel guilty the whole time so hopefully I come to accept it.

I guess I just want to express that all those people who left London last night are to some some extent 'selfish' but these are special circumstances and we do have to have sympathy for everyone at this time. No-one is enjoying this and we all need support, not finger pointing

That's understandable, to be honest. The way it was thrown on us all would have caused a lot of panic and changing of plans. The numbers rushing to leave London was probably predictable.

It's done now so no point beating yourself up about it. At least you'll be driving and can maybe both try to isolate for a week or so on arrival to avoid spreading further.

I do think the government have to take some responsibility for the numbers fleeing. What did they expect? Short of policing the stations (and it wasn't illegal to leave) it was always going to happen.

Certainly not true though that anyone in their right mind is doing so, as @Matt42 suggests. We were already feeling weird about seeing our parents due to the risk and would be even less likely to go now. My partner's parents live in a big house in a rural area surrounded by fields. It's lovely there at Christmas. But his dad is 75 and they don't have covid in their village, or at least not on any kind of scale. Would absolutely hate to bring it there. My parents are in tier 4 too now as well and won't be seeing anyone.

Our flat isn't big and to be honest I'm a bit sick of the sight of it! And the two parks where I go for walks. But London is my home. I do acknowledge that I'm lucky to live with my partner and that we get on well. But we will be staying put until things are better.

For anyone who got a train last night, were they as packed as normal or was there any attempt to create distancing? Our concerns about transport meant we had already sacked off going to the in-laws a while back, but am interested to know how it was. Got a few trains in the summer and it was patchy, with some cordoning off seats to create space and some not bothering. There's no effort at all on the tubes I've been on.

Edited by Zoo Music Girl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely you have to mitigate any ‘selfishness’ of people fleeing London, against how the Government have handled it.

Under mounting pressure to cancel Xmas, they deliberately had a press conference a few days ago when they literally said they wouldn’t be cancelling Xmas, then a few days later did a complete 180.

People were completely and unnecessarily lulled into a false sense of security, believing up to 4pm yesterday they could spend Xmas with their family.

Its all very well taking the moral high ground, but ultimately they’ve been completely dicked over by the government so I don’t blame anyone who decided to do something about it.

Edited by Deaf Nobby Burton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Ah - the Christmas is a load of nothing gaslighting. 

I've always got on well with you on here but grow the fuck up Matt.

I'm not judging you for making the decision to leave London, I empathise with it, but at least own it & accept it's a selfish move rather than attacking anyone and everyone who challenges you. 

Edited by Frankly Mr Shankly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

I have the option if driving to Cornwall for a pint I don't - because it would be irresponsible and I want to return to normality as quickly as possible for EVERYONE. 

 

You have the option of a pint in tier 2. 

Why does everyone keep talking about driving to fucking Cornwall. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Homer said:

How I’ve got this far without pointing out that I’m staying in my flat in London for the duration is beyond me. Just another selfless act I guess. You can all thank me on my birthday. 😇

F7E48CA6-FCEE-4A5D-A84B-8675CB43BA7E.jpeg

 

People will be praising you and eating giant chocolate eggs in your memory for thousands of years to come!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

I've always got on well with you on here but grow the fuck up Matt.

I'm not judging you for making the decision to leave London, I empathise with it, but at least own it & accept it's a selfish move rather than attacking anyone and everyone who challenges you. 

Well your comment was total nonsense and added nothing to the conversation. Of course you can spin some clever argument that Christmas is some social construct which everyone makes a big deal of. By that logic Glastonbury is music in a field of tents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...