Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Tour Announcements & Upcoming Gigs


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

I dunno. If they offer up a secret set on a smaller stage playing Funeral would the festival really turn it down?  Getting a freebie from a former headliner - albeit with a tarnished rep - is a way of shoring up a weaker line up.

Why would they play for free? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

I dunno. If they offer up a secret set on a smaller stage playing Funeral would the festival really turn it down?  Getting a freebie from a former headliner - albeit with a tarnished rep - is a way of shoring up a weaker line up.

Normally I see where you're coming from, but I'd be ashamed of the festival if they took that approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, adequate8 said:

Why would they play for free? 

 

Reputation laundering. Getting back in people's good graces.

 

5 hours ago, clarkete said:

Normally I see where you're coming from, but I'd be ashamed of the festival if they took that approach. 

 

On any given year you can find wrong 'uns on the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

Reputation laundering. Getting back in people's good graces.

 

 

On any given year you can find wrong 'uns on the bill.

 

But those were historical wrong uns who have been in active festival circulation.  These aren't historical, or in active festival circulation and this festival is always trying to be more progressive about gender related issues - so it would be an embarrassing step back. 

Edited by clarkete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, adequate8 said:

Why would they play for free? 

I don't think they meant for free - just to take a smaller slot as a secret set which is paid a fair bit less than Pyramid Sub / Other Headliner (which is probably around where they are now)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DarthSaul said:

@Slugy I can't quote reply but AF artist presale is through ticketmaster code Funeral20

Cheers mate. I can see anywhere to enter it, I assume you have to wait for the tickets to drop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, balti-pie said:

Would love to hear of Arcade Fire playing to 17 people at brixton academy, due to a nationwide crackdown on a) people who don't understand the concept of consent and b) sh*tty ticket prices.

Some people clearly have more money than sense - and whatever sense is left over isn't enough to care. grim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, gfa said:

Some people clearly have more money than sense - and whatever sense is left over isn't enough to care. grim

 

On this fence about this.

 

I was at their last show in 2022, after the news of Win Butler’s behaviour broke and I will admit that it was quite an uncomfortable atmosphere (not just because the Queen also died that day). It’s worth noting standing was £70 for this show, I agree that £90 is crazy for a gig ticket but £70 two years ago wasn’t OTT so I can kind of accept a £20 increase.

 

I imagine this will be the last time I see them as the quality of their output has notably dipped. I’m going to take opportunity to see a band that was at one point one of my favourite bands, celebrating an album that was a formative part of my youth. The chance to see a band that has headlined most major festivals around the world in such a smaller venue also comes into consideration.

 

It’s a case of having to separate the art from the artist, whilst not tarnishing 80% of the band for 20% of the bands behaviour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, aldo88 said:

 

On this fence about this.

 

I was at their last show in 2022, after the news of Win Butler’s behaviour broke and I will admit that it was quite an uncomfortable atmosphere (not just because the Queen also died that day). It’s worth noting standing was £70 for this show, I agree that £90 is crazy for a gig ticket but £70 two years ago wasn’t OTT so I can kind of accept a £20 increase.

 

I imagine this will be the last time I see them as the quality of their output has notably dipped. I’m going to take opportunity to see a band that was at one point one of my favourite bands, celebrating an album that was a formative part of my youth. The chance to see a band that has headlined most major festivals around the world in such a smaller venue also comes into consideration.

 

It’s a case of having to separate the art from the artist, whilst not tarnishing 80% of the band for 20% of the bands behaviour.

All i will say is that the band put out a statement supporting Win, so im happy to tarnish them with the same brush

 

His brother quit his band just before allegations broke. Smart guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Andy0808 v5 said:

Can’t wait to see the same energy on here for Lizzo’s next tour. I’m sure you’ll all be calling for empty venues and being bellends to those who want to see her 🤔 

She isnt being accused of the same thing

 

anyway, her case is going through the courts, so we will see what they say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alot of one case for one, one for another going on. 

 

£90 to see one of the best albums ever made in a reasonably small setting is great value. Sadly I'm at Werchter over the weekend watching bands like Nothing But Thieves who get nowhere near the sort of bad press on here like Arcade Fire.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DarthSaul said:

Easy to say when you don't care for the band in the first place. I didn't notice similar comments re Ezra Koenig during the Vampire Weekend on-sale last week

No idea if this is aimed at me but plenty of people do care and are not going to see them due to this despite liking them - myself included (well i wouldn't pay £110 but would definitely for a normal price)

 

I didn't even know about Ezra Koenig until just now - its clearly less widely known or people would be talking about it here , you'd definitely see at least one mention. Classic whataboutism though...

 

I can't even seem to figure out the full story from a quick google, would be interested if someone can explain as theres a few reddit posts and poorly written articles but nothing apparent of much substance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Away from the allegations/disreputable behaviour etc. the ticket prices for AF are ridiculous.  Anyone paying that needs to give their head a wobble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

Away from the allegations/disreputable behaviour etc. the ticket prices for AF are ridiculous.  Anyone paying that needs to give their head a wobble.

Whilst I agree they are crazy prices - they aren't really much different to similarly themed The Killers tour; which has sold out across the board. 

 

I'd expect at least one additional date at Brixton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

Away from the allegations/disreputable behaviour etc. the ticket prices for AF are ridiculous.  Anyone paying that needs to give their head a wobble.

I paid it for Noel Gallagher at the Royal Albert Hall. Turned out to be one of my favourite ever gigs so glad I did! (had pretty much the best possible seats)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Latest Activity

    • Ah, well. Never mind, hey.
    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...