Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

When was the last time two headliners were unannounced when the big poster dropped? I can only think of the Who not being announced before the poster in the time I've been going, and that was only because they were a late booking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SighMo said:

What about Foals? Got a mate whose convinced it’ll be them but I’m struggling with it. They’re in Bournemouth on 26th. 

I think they’ll be a secret jp set personally would love to see them high on the pyramid or headline other though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Scott129 said:

When was the last time two headliners were unannounced when the big poster dropped? I can only think of the Who not being announced before the poster in the time I've been going, and that was only because they were a late booking

Were any of the headliners announced pre-2013 lineup drop? I definitely remember there still being a bit of a question mark over the Stones up until that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, FloorFiller said:

They’ll go down an absolute storm on the night, there’s no doubting that. They’re just not the most inspired booking, especially after their JP set went down so well. Them being booked to headline the Pyramid two years after that with no new material is just a bit of a damp squib.

But yeah, on the night I doubt any people in that crowd will care - they do what they do well and have enough singalongs to keep a headliner crowd happy. It just won’t be one for the history books by any stretch of the imagination. 

they released a new album a few months after that (which is surprisingly decent IMO).

e: according to wiki, it's the best/highest-rated of all their albums on Metacritic.

Edited by ghostdancer1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ghostdancer1 said:

they released a new album a few months after that (which is surprisingly decent IMO).

e: according to wiki, it's the best/highest-rated of all their albums on Metacritic.

Aye but they played the biggest/only moderate hit from it, and I doubt many are crying out for a setlist full of songs from that album - seems to have been largely forgotten about much like the album before it.

That was just a nitpicky point anyway. They’re a drab headliner regardless of if they have new material to tour behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scott129 said:

When was the last time two headliners were unannounced when the big poster dropped? I can only think of the Who not being announced before the poster in the time I've been going, and that was only because they were a late booking

Metallica were a TBC on the poster weren't they? Seem to remember that being the case.

Fucking hell it seems really weird now that Metallica headlined Glastonbury. And I was there.

Edited by Zoo Music Girl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Were any of the headliners announced pre-2013 lineup drop? I definitely remember there still being a bit of a question mark over the Stones up until that point.

I honestly can't remember but I know the Stones were on the poster as I remember being very excited when that dropped. Were the other two announced before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Ha I might have made that up. But that's how I remember it weirdly. Special guest or something?

Yeah just looked it up and they were listed as special guests. Kasabian weren't announced until the poster that year either but I think we'd known it was them for a while anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Pretty sure that Lars and the lads were listed as 'Special Guests' at one point.

They were, because of their exclusive with Sonosphere I think it was. We had to wait until June until they were confirmed IIRC. We knew well in advance of that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any information recently about anything Neil? I’m sure we’d literally take the line up of the food vans at the moment!

Even if it’s someone cats sisters mum works at a shop that serves someone aunties brother and they say so and so is playing.....I’ll take anything other than this plastic bottle shit they keep banging on about! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh aye. IIRC my man from Sonisphere even did a blog or Facebook post about how Metallica were originally booked as an exclusive but when they came asking to also do the G he didn't want to be the guy to fuck it all up for everyone and it was all for the good of metal as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

We’ve reached that time of year where impatience starts to creep in. Without wishing to generalise it’s always the younger, less experienced posters who start. Those of us who’ve done this a few times know this always how it is.

Still another month I reckon.

So what your saying is.....

 

Patience

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...