Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Tranquility of Solitude said:

Lot of anti Killers sentiment on this thread, so for balance I fricking love them, thought they were terrific in JP 2017, and can't wait to see them on Pyramid. I also loved Coldplay with my flashing wristband. There. I've said it. Not ashamed in the slightest.

I don't dislike The Killers at all. I just think after coming back from the fallow year it's an incredibly dull choice of headliner. It's just like "huh, that's it?" I think most of us were hoping for something to really blow our socks off and we've ended up with an act who played the last festival, have headlined before, and haven't really done much of note in the past 10 years. And it's also the fact we already have The Cure as heavily rumoured, who are in some ways equally shoulder shruggy.

Edited by jparx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Tranquility of Solitude said:

Lot of anti Killers sentiment on this thread, so for balance I fricking love them, thought they were terrific in JP 2017, and can't wait to see them on Pyramid. I also loved Coldplay with my flashing wristband. There. I've said it. Not ashamed in the slightest.

They’ll go down an absolute storm on the night, there’s no doubting that. They’re just not the most inspired booking, especially after their JP set went down so well. Them being booked to headline the Pyramid two years after that with no new material is just a bit of a damp squib.

But yeah, on the night I doubt any people in that crowd will care - they do what they do well and have enough singalongs to keep a headliner crowd happy. It just won’t be one for the history books by any stretch of the imagination. 

Edited by FloorFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tranquility of Solitude said:

Lot of anti Killers sentiment on this thread, so for balance I fricking love them, thought they were terrific in JP 2017, and can't wait to see them on Pyramid. I also loved Coldplay with my flashing wristband. There. I've said it. Not ashamed in the slightest.

Got to agree with that, plenty of options available if they don’t float your boat. I saw the killers from the hedge at the back of the field as the tent was so full and Coldplay was just a right good end to the festival. That’s the beauty of Glastonbury, such a wide diversity of bands no one should be disappointed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mattymooz said:

Same as The Cure tho innit

Like Stormzy, I don't think The Cure are a particularly strong headliner but they'd be passable enough buttressing someone stronger, the entire lynchpin performance around which the rest of the weekend revolves.

That performance isn't by a man dressed like a croupier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s the combination of headliners that’s the issue. 

If we had a Gaga, Madonna or K-Dot on the Pymild then the others would be forgiven. 

3 beige headliners in the same year is what truly sucks balls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Nah - first time up was understandable  given the prevailing zeitgeist.  The only reason they're thought of fondly and so in contention at all now is due to a single student disco staple.

It’s no different to Muse, Coldplay, Arctic Monkeys, Foo Fighters in recent years. These aren’t exciting choices but just big, broadly popular bands. I find it strange that it’s being painted up as unusual - The Strokes would have been pretty much what you described, but The Killers broke out of that.

1 minute ago, nikkic said:

It’s the combination of headliners that’s the issue. 

If we had a Gaga, Madonna or K-Dot on the Pymild then the others would be forgiven. 

3 beige headliners in the same year is what truly sucks balls. 

If you think they are three beige performers then your problem lies with Stormzy. They weren’t gonna book one of the ones you mentioned and also Stormzy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dentalplan said:

It’s no different to Muse, Coldplay, Arctic Monkeys, Foo Fighters in recent years. These aren’t exciting choices but just big, broadly popular bands. 

No fan of any of these, but they all have longish careers and discographies that don't just rely on a song or two.

The Strokes is the nearest comparison, but even then they've got an album's worth of jams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

If you think they are three beige performers then your problem lies with Stormzy. They weren’t gonna book one of the ones you mentioned and also Stormzy.

Not sure why they wouldn’t replace Bob and the lads with Madge if she were available/willing to play.

Stormzy/Madge/Killers looks miles better to me. 

Is what it is though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say Stormzy is the most interesting of the presumptive headliners. It is undoubtedly a bold move with the potential to deliver a career changing moment, or an epic failure. My money is on the former, I think Stormzy will deliver. Putting Stormzy in an unfamiliar position adds an extra tension to his appearance, he has such a positive persona I'd imagine (unlike Kanye) the crowd will be willing him to succeed, it could be a real moment.

The Cure and Killers, they have been there, done that, water of a ducks back, they will knock what they do out of the park and people will enjoy it but I doubt there will be anything revelatory enough to make their performances uniquely memorable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

No fan of any of these, but they all have longish careers and discographies that don't just rely on a song or two.

The Strokes is the nearest comparison, but even then they've got an album's worth of jams.

I think The Killers must have a bunch at least as big as Muse tracks but then one ginormo-hit that towers over the rest of their shit.

1 minute ago, nikkic said:

Not sure why they wouldn’t replace Bob and the lads with Madge if she were available/willing to play.

Stormzy/Madge/Killers looks miles better to me. 

Is what it is though. 

So they should just book Madonna? Come on.

Anyway, as I’ve said plenty, the festival has always had a couple of rock bands headline since any of us started going haven’t they? So why just expect it to change overnight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...