Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Glastocam!


pauladam

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, parsonjack said:

Bloody hell....the operator of the right hand digger might need a clean pair of pants 😬

I'm only guessing but I think each of the two diggers would have had some sort of cable connected to it and while the right hand one pulled it down the left probably slowed its accent. 

 

Reminds me of gold rush when they move the wash plants! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad end for Pangea and we’ll never get to see how it would have developed. I worry that the Arcadia crew may be disillusioned by the limitations of what they can do at Glastonbury in the context of planning limitations. Clearly any future project has to be dismantled now and rebuilt every year which does potentially limit things beyond something like the spider, which is not as vast as Pangea. As they said, dismantling something on the scale of Pangea is not financially viable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Keithy said:

Sad end for Pangea and we’ll never get to see how it would have developed. I worry that the Arcadia crew may be disillusioned by the limitations of what they can do at Glastonbury in the context of planning limitations. Clearly any future project has to be dismantled now and rebuilt every year which does potentially limit things beyond something like the spider, which is not as vast as Pangea. As they said, dismantling something on the scale of Pangea is not financially viable. 

Yeah was thinking the same, when you think in that BBC video above that they said they had scoured the world in places like India looking for something and eventually found the crane, they obviously had given it a lot of thought and had some big plans for the next five years. I reckon the projector ball thing was really just a placeholder and then it would’ve really developed properly from there  on after 2019. With all the cost they would’ve incurred I very much doubt they’ll ever entertain anything that can’t be completely dismantled again. Let’s hope they’ve still got some fresh ideas up their sleeve for 2023 and beyond. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Keithy said:

Sad end for Pangea and we’ll never get to see how it would have developed. I worry that the Arcadia crew may be disillusioned by the limitations of what they can do at Glastonbury in the context of planning limitations. Clearly any future project has to be dismantled now and rebuilt every year which does potentially limit things beyond something like the spider, which is not as vast as Pangea. As they said, dismantling something on the scale of Pangea is not financially viable. 

Wasn’t it more that they had to renew all of the safety certificates that was prohibitive rather than the actual dismantling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, tarw said:

Wasn’t it more that they had to renew all of the safety certificates that was prohibitive rather than the actual dismantling?

Makes sense as the crane was no longer cost effective in it’s original location which will have prompted the sale of it to the festival. Like any old piece of machinery when it costs more to keep it running than it is worth then it’s time to scrap it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing devils advocate for a second... was perhaps a bit of a silly gamble to stick a whopping great big crane up in the middle of a Somerset field without planning permission. Must be kicking themselves. I'm sure the festival would take most of the financial hit though right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Yeah was thinking the same, when you think in that BBC video above that they said they had scoured the world in places like India looking for something and eventually found the crane, they obviously had given it a lot of thought and had some big plans for the next five years. I reckon the projector ball thing was really just a placeholder and then it would’ve really developed properly from there  on after 2019. With all the cost they would’ve incurred I very much doubt they’ll ever entertain anything that can’t be completely dismantled again. Let’s hope they’ve still got some fresh ideas up their sleeve for 2023 and beyond. 

I suppose the option for a permanent, evolving structure is somewhere on the farm that has trees to obscure the base. Somewhere like the JP stage area probably would have enough coverage but it's too disassociated from the SE corner and bulk of the festival.

Hopefully they brace the artistic challenge of creating something new that is sympathetic to the landscape.

Shame Michael couldn't just built a new hay barn over it so it's hidden all year round. Not sure the council can object to a hay barn on a farm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know whether the Other Stage is the same base as 2019? I don’t have any progression pictures from that time but maybe someone could cross reference the structure they have now compared to the one used 3 years ago. Otherwise it will probably be a while before we can tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Keithy said:

Shame Michael couldn't just built a new hay barn over it so it's hidden all year round. Not sure the council can object to a hay barn on a farm.

I think that the Arcadia field is actually part of another farm. Steanbow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, squirrelarmy said:

We could be overthinking what the diggers are doing. It could just be Time Team doing an archeological survey trying to find the origins of the people who built the stone circle. 

Just knock on Michaels door, origins answered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • It was great, but I don't know why they continue to play Wide Lovely Eyes and Rings of Saturn, which are the weakest of the tracks off both PTSA and ST. Well, I do. It's cos they're about Suzie, so he can sing what he wants. They're the low points of the set. The rest is ace.
    • I didn't this time, but I've seen them before and just because you saw both that night doesn’t mean you can compare them. The Stones were great, but.you didn't think so and you went somewhere else looking for a good time and you found it. For whatever reason you didn't like it, but you were an outlier and all the reviews said they were great.
    • Annie Lennox could be the one to unite the whole forum, nobody has a bad word to say about her, even noted curmudgeon Skip 😄 I'd probably even amble along for a bit meself, and i'm also a miserable sod 
    • If the below link works - thats interesting.   While I don't particularly put much stock in that account as a source (never seen it before though, tbf), and I can pick a hole or two (see below) in what he says - the timing of it is a week before I had the Fontaines '27 stadium info (same stadium he says on there, Tottenham). The info, or part of it, matches up.   Holes I'd pick: I'd have to watch again but I THINK he says 'end of year' for Tottenham - not possible, for a number of reasons, though he's probably just got his words mixed up there. It's Summer '27, or that's what I've been told. He also says Glastonbury is/would be based on how the album does. That doesn't stack up to me, unless it was a 2028 thing. I suppose that could stack up, i.e a verbal agreement for 2028, but still seems a bit of an odd approach. I would personally still expect it to be 2027 alongside the stadium gigs, IF they are gonna do it, though I've still not got a Scooby when the album is gonna drop, only that the tour is due for Spring (or early) next year.   Interesting, nonetheless.   https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaOB3Q9qkwW/
    • I was hoping that they would just do a tour like they were set to in 2020, rather than having Download as their UK appearance. If they are at DL, I would be surprised to see them headline. I think they sub under Deftones or SOAD 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...