Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Oasis


Guest

Recommended Posts

Not a chance in hell Oasis were ever going to kick off their reunion tour with a festival headline set. Fully understandable.

 

Anyway, the “it will not be televised” and the “these dates will be the band’s exclusive European dates” line from the press release suggest there’s zero chance of any festival appearances next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CantWaitForGlasto22 said:

The quote from the band in the Guardian says “The guns have fallen silent. The stars have aligned. The great wait is over. Come see. It will not be televised.” I think that probably does tule out a Glastonbury headline before the tour as that would be televised. Shame, but I can also understand they’d want to start with their own shows first 😢 

Think you're reading too much into that tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

With their egos..

 

Sure there’ll be a complex plan put in place to keep them separated whenever they’re off stage, but that doesn’t account for the possibility of Liam getting drunk and calling Noel a “moo moo cow” on Twitter or something. 

If I wanted to see them I would be trying for the earliest one possible. There’s a good chance they won’t make it through the whole tour 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Benjsh said:

It's set to be the biggest British Music event in years and Glasto won't even get a look in. 

 

As a manc and massive Oasis fan I'm glad though. These gigs are for us. Seeing them at Glasto either in the field or on the BBC will ruin the surprise.

Weird of them to play gigs in Cardiff only for the people of Manchester.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Benjsh said:

It's set to be the biggest British Music event in years and Glasto won't even get a look in. 

 

As a manc and massive Oasis fan I'm glad though. These gigs are for us. Seeing them at Glasto either in the field or on the BBC will ruin the surprise.

'For Us' haha its already started. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, -TLR- said:

 

very much doubt any price info will be available until you get to the checkout page.

 

but i think to ball park it - think of a stupidly high number, double it, add another zero to the end...

My guess is £115 before fees for back stadning £150 before fees for front standing. Seating anywhere from £70 - £110. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, chazwwe said:

My guess is £115 before fees for back stadning £150 before fees for front standing. Seating anywhere from £70 - £110. 

Lower tier Seating was about £105 for Catfish and the Bottlemen 😂, I’d suggest oasis will be a bit more 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, watsonjm said:

 

Don't think this will be far wrong, maybe higher to 'best' seats 

I was thinking about this yesterday and looking at Wembley's seating plans. What actually constitutes the "best seats" in a giant stadium for a gig? Mid-height, on the sides closest to the stage?! I've sat at 02 arena-type gigs before and always thought that they're the best kind of views, is this the same at a stadium like Wembley? Bollox would I want to pay 200 to be looking directly at them from the other end of the stadium!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guns have fallen silent, my arse. They've looked at the opportunity they're wasting and the money to be made and just agreed to tolerate one another as the time is right what with little other 90s guitar indie to complete with musically right now and before they get any older!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, LinvoyPrimus said:

Not a chance in hell Oasis were ever going to kick off their reunion tour with a festival headline set. Fully understandable.

 

Anyway, the “it will not be televised” and the “these dates will be the band’s exclusive European dates” line from the press release suggest there’s zero chance of any festival appearances next year.

 

I’m more surprised they are kicking off their decade plus reunion tour in Cardiff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...