Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, MEGABOWL said:

Have you ever got an answer? I can’t imagine what it would be. If it’s not for you it’s not for you. 

I’ve been pointed in the direction of certain tracks or albums to give a go. Occasionally it does change my opinion, but not that often if I’m honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, balti-pie said:

Polarisation and extreme positions are pretty much the online model of the last couple of years, though. It’s Godwin’s law writ large. Ed Sheeran is either absolutely amazing and incredible, or an actual aural genocide, and there’s only two positions to take with no shades of grey anywhere in the middle. There’s no middle any more, so pick your zone and get to it! 

I often find middle ground. Apart from a few short years of my later teen / early adult life, where I mostly listened to Hip Hop and D&B, I've generally not cornered myself into one or two genres. I can listen to most artists / bands and find songs I like and songs I don't, without having to declare them shite, or my heroes. 

Take your example, Ed, I've been to his shows, and thoroughly enjoyed them. Am I fan? No, my other half is. Do I think he's shit? No, he has songs I really like, and songs I just don't like. Looking at the divide album, Castle On The Hill was a song I really enjoyed, yet Shape Of You was a song I really did not like at all. I would never buy his merch or call myself an Ed fan, but I would go and see him again. I have a lot of respect and admiration for the way he performs live, with his loop pedals etc. I actually think he's one of the better live performers out there. Yet I could also think of 100 acts who aren't necessarily as good live that I'd rather go and see. 

I guess that makes me boring and an outsider who doesn't belong anywhere. 😥😭

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alvoram said:

I often find middle ground. Apart from a few short years of my later teen / early adult life, where I mostly listened to Hip Hop and D&B, I've generally not cornered myself into one or two genres. I can listen to most artists / bands and find songs I like and songs I don't, without having to declare them shite, or my heroes. 

Take your example, Ed, I've been to his shows, and thoroughly enjoyed them. Am I fan? No, my other half is. Do I think he's shit? No, he has songs I really like, and songs I just don't like. Looking at the divide album, Castle On The Hill was a song I really enjoyed, yet Shape Of You was a song I really did not like at all. I would never buy his merch or call myself an Ed fan, but I would go and see him again. I have a lot of respect and admiration for the way he performs live, with his loop pedals etc. I actually think he's one of the better live performers out there. Yet I could also think of 100 acts who aren't necessarily as good live that I'd rather go and see. 

I guess that makes me boring and an outsider who doesn't belong anywhere. 😥😭

Nah this is me too so you’re not alone. There’s very few musicians I hate enough to get excited about it - struggling to think of one actually

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alvoram said:

 

I guess that makes me boring and an outsider who doesn't belong anywhere. 😥😭

Not even a bit. It just means you're not sucked in to the slightly performative arguments on here and on other online binfires and hellpits.

I am sucked in, to be honest, i love a good solid rant against a bland everyman like Coldplay and Sheeran 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, balti-pie said:

Not even a bit. It just means you're not sucked in to the slightly performative arguments on here and on other online binfires and hellpits.

I am sucked in, to be honest, i love a good solid rant against a bland everyman like Coldplay and Sheeran 😄

Oh I do still get sucked in, usually by people's negativity towards artists 🙈 I should just learn to ignore them and say to myself 'that's your opinion' and move on, but it's just too tempting to engage sometimes. Coldplay was actually good example of that... 😂

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

They've not said that. I guess we'll see but there's certainly no indication from the band that this will be it. Yet.

Dream booking for me. No one I'd rather see on that stage. Sadly, I think they're destined to forever swerve the farm.

Same as pj then lol.. Shame.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

I’ve been pointed in the direction of certain tracks or albums to give a go. Occasionally it does change my opinion, but not that often if I’m honest.

 Makes sense. Fair play for trying.

Edited by MEGABOWL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Traci said:

What about Yeah Yeah Yeahs? I seen them in Barcelona this year - they were fantastic! Karen O is so good live 

Maybe not Pyramid but made to headline The Other or Park Stage 

You'd think they would be on the circuit next year having released an album recently, but no sign of them so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Glasto96 said:

Could they squeeze in anywhere on the line up do you think?

1DC95719-6F84-4CAF-8491-80ED0900C838.jpeg

Anywhere as in you want not Kasabian to headline now. I mean its already going to be a thing with The Prodigy getting a high slot most likely, so they just gonna give em out like candy cause they kicked their asshole singer out of the band?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sisco said:

Call me mad but I’m really coming around to the idea that pulp are the legend spot 

I'd be happy with that! its going to be tricky for me to get to see the late headliners (taking kids) so would suit me perfectly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sisco said:

Call me mad but I’m really coming around to the idea that pulp are the legend spot 

Hadn’t thought of that. Oh that would be great. Didn’t someone say the legend slot ‘wouldn’t please the locals?’ I may have imagined that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sooooo, one of my best friends works in a senior position at BBC Radio and has always given me info on gigs, festivals etc months in advance. They genuinely know everyone and going to gigs with them is a nightmare because of the numbers of people saying hello! 

I have been probing for info on Glastonbury and they have had no idea, but last night they sent a text saying they had been out for lunch with someone on the inside who said the remaining headliners were Harry Styles and GnR. 

A caveat - they said that this person *may* be wrong, but never has been before. My contact was shocked as they thought there would no doubt be a female headliner in there somewhere. I of course thought Arctic Monkeys were a shoe in but maybe they aren't? Unless Harry Styles is supporting one of the headliners?

My biggest surprise on it was the idea that GnR would play - a headliner trio of Elton, Harry and Monkeys seems much more Glastonbury tbh. 

Anyway, just passing on information. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Super Johnny Fos said:

Sooooo, one of my best friends works in a senior position at BBC Radio and has always given me info on gigs, festivals etc months in advance. They genuinely know everyone and going to gigs with them is a nightmare because of the numbers of people saying hello! 

I have been probing for info on Glastonbury and they have had no idea, but last night they sent a text saying they had been out for lunch with someone on the inside who said the remaining headliners were Harry Styles and GnR. 

A caveat - they said that this person *may* be wrong, but never has been before. My contact was shocked as they thought there would no doubt be a female headliner in there somewhere. I of course thought Arctic Monkeys were a shoe in but maybe they aren't? Unless Harry Styles is supporting one of the headliners?

My biggest surprise on it was the idea that GnR would play - a headliner trio of Elton, Harry and Monkeys seems much more Glastonbury tbh. 

Anyway, just passing on information. 

Surely people at the BBC don't get given headliner info, at least not this far in advance. Maybe a week before the poster drop max for the article write up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, scatteredscreens said:

Surely people at the BBC don't get given headliner info, at least not this far in advance. Maybe a week before the poster drop max for the article write up.

You're underestimating the amount of chatter that goes on behind the scenes in the music/media industry. Stuff like this will be talked about between people months before it's announced publicly, same as festival and gig bookers getting intel on who's around 12 months in advance. It's just none of those people spend time on boards like this or have any reason to blab online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...