Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

Lay person question

exactly how do they plan to vaccinate potentially tens of millions of people in 3-4 months? It just doesnt sound realistic

who will decide when enough people have had it that we can open up?

i’ve heard 1 million vaccinated per week. By easter thats 13-15 million. Is that enough to open up? 

What about the millions that will refuse it or the very clinically vulnerable who it may not be suitable for?

hancock saying easter just doesnt sound plausible. Mid summer does though.

for me a large scale mass rapid testing success alongside the vaccine is surely going to be crucial to allow reopening

Edited by Memory Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tigger123 said:

I thought the Oxford team were doing PCR tests on their trial volunteers too, to assess whether transmission still occurs in those vaccinated ? Do we know when we can expect the results on this, as surely this is key?

they mentioned it in the press release that it seems to stop transmission as well. But that'll be in their final paper i assume

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been helping out at my local cricket club this weekend as they have been asked to provide the room as a vaccination centre by the NHS.

I spoke to a rep from the NHS and he said they are sourcing places like to be ready to go after the 2nd December for either Covid vaccines and/or flu jabs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Memory Man said:

Lay person question

exactly how do they plan to vaccinate potentially tens of millions of people in 3-4 months? It just doesnt sound realistic

who will decide when enough people have had it that we can open up?

i’ve heard 1 million vaccinated per week. By easter thats 13-15 million. Is that enough to open up? 

What about the millions that will refuse it or the very clinically vulnerable who it may not be suitable for?

hancock saying easter just doesnt sound plausible. Mid summer does though.

for me a large scale mass rapid testing success alongside the vaccine is surely going to be crucial to allow reopening

Its not mandatory for one thing. So if someone refuses, they'll give it to someone who wants it. 

 

They vaccinate millions for flu.  If the oxford one gets approval, it wont need freezing, so you can do it in chemists e,t.c.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I’d prefer a quiet Christmas, with visits to close relatives such as parents .  A time to reflect on the terrible year that’s gone by and look forward to a return to normality in the very near future. In my opinion there’s no need to allow or encourage larger gatherings with the inevitable over indulgence in alcohol.  Just a chance to meet those very close relatives, observing hand cleansing etc. All we would like is a chance to see our grandkids with their presents and I assume many on here would relish the opportunity to visit parents.  

Today’s announcement of yet more good news on the vaccines should be an incentive to stay safe for just a little longer. We are so close now to getting our holidays, festivals etc next year it would be crazy to spoil that just for five days of scenes like those witnessed when the first lockdown stopped. Just my opinion, others may disagree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Some questions raised by Ed Conway in this thread - @Toilet Duckany thoughts? 

EDIT: Questions raised in follow up tweet;

Is this a) a reminder that the immune system is ultimately something of a mystery b) something about the way the tests were carried out c) something about Brazil vs UK or d) something else? The gap between those numbers seems quite big.

Edited by Chef
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

I don’t think so, the media will jump in this and hammer it home that we have a vaccine coming. It’s probably just that the initial press notice had the main headline of 70% effective which is true, then when more came out we got the additional news. It’s when you dig down into the story you see the fuller picture. 
 

If anything they’ve done the opposite of sensationalising the story.

Yeah, completely! As if reducing a Great Outcome for mankind to a Good Outcome is sensationalising things.

Ridiculous to bash the press for being measured in their reporting. 

Your confirmation bias at work...

Edited by xxialac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More great news to boost spirits. I have always been pretty sceptical that anything would be in place in time for Glastonbury '21 to go ahead but feel a bit more optimistic this morning.

Not totally convinced yet as everything is couched in pretty woolly language and nothing specific - what does "“things will be able to start to get back to normal” after Easter" actually mean?

How long will it take to get back to normal. What will life and restrictions be like in the meantime? 

Gone from 'no chance' to 50/50 that Glastonbury might be allowed. Far more optimistic about chances for something like EoTR in September  due to the extra two months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Dawg said:

I have been helping out at my local cricket club this weekend as they have been asked to provide the room as a vaccination centre by the NHS.

I spoke to a rep from the NHS and he said they are sourcing places like to be ready to go after the 2nd December for either Covid vaccines and/or flu jabs.

Cool, sounds like the way forward for a mass vaccination plan 

This government were always waiting on a vaccine, they never had any other real plan. I think thats been made abundantly clear today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Copperface said:

More great news to boost spirits. I have always been pretty sceptical that anything would be in place in time for Glastonbury '21 to go ahead but feel a bit more optimistic this morning.

Not totally convinced yet as everything is couched in pretty woolly language and nothing specific - what does "“things will be able to start to get back to normal” after Easter" actually mean?

How long will it take to get back to normal. What will life and restrictions be like in the meantime? 

Gone from 'no chance' to 50/50 that Glastonbury might be allowed. Far more optimistic about chances for something like EoTR in September  due to the extra two months.

EoTR also has far less infrastructure/setup needs and a capacity of 14,000. I'd say that one is a certainty...

 

If it wasn't for the need to plan in advance, Glastonbury would be more likely than now. 

As is, it's a very close one to call.

The other major problem of course is that bands need to make an early call too (an even earlier one for those doing world tours)

I think it will go ahead - just - but without a lot of non-European names that had been planned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

Although to be honest we also said Glasto 2020 would be happening as well 😂

Those posts have been redacted now 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely bonkers about the ‘saving Christmas’ announcement to be made later today. We are so close now to coming out of this, even more so with fantastic news today, to throw caution to the wind for a few days. As I’ve mentioned many times before - go Professor Sarah Gilbert and the rest of the amazing Oxford team. I have followed their progress, maybe too obsessively since the beginning of the year - it’s one of the things keeping me sane this year knowing that proper science and factual evidence by the ‘grown ups’ would come through for us. My own family had already decided some time ago to have the quietest Christmas ever with hopefully the best Summer ever in 2021. I presume though that those who have been cautious will be anyway and the others that have said f**k it all along will continue to do so?

However, maybe there are the mitigating factors that the schools will not be spreading infection over Christmas and the eldest most likely to need hospitalisation will have had the vaccination so will it balance out and not overwhelm the NHS? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/21/2020 at 11:42 AM, eFestivals said:

There's more than one option for getting exercise.

I'm sure that anyone smart enough to get themselves to a gym is smart enough to come up with some short term alternatives that can be done at home or in outdoor space.

And I don't doubt that people wanting anything they do can come up with some reason for why they think it should be allowed.

I guess you are not a gym goer.... its easy to make these statements from ignorance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, xxialac said:

I think it will go ahead - just - but without a lot of non-European names that had been planned.

I’m prepared to sacrifice the likes of Taylor Swift and Kendrick Lamar if there is no travel from the US in favour of more homegrown bands. If US travel is off the cards then Elton may be available if his tour is put back again and possibly even Fleetwood Mac but I don’t think we’ll be that lucky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Leyrulion said:

I booked my Airbnb for the night before boomtown this morning on the same basis.

August festivals 100% on. June I'm still 50/50.

Where I’m lying caution with Glasto/Sziget/Rock Werchter etc is they are all surely huge international festivals which rely on international artists and international audiences. 

Just because the UK might finish its vaccination plan first, does that mean glasto would be financially plausible to go ahead if lots of international bands and audience weren’t able to come? Similarly, the NHS could mess up the vaccination plan and the whole thing could get delayed meaning glasto wasn’t feasible and a different international festival might be able to run.

My concern with Glastonbury is how big the scale of the event is, how many people attend and how international the event is. I’m thinking surely we will ease back into things rather than rushing so I wonder whether they would consider to downscale it at all.

The likes of Sziget too, it’s in Hungary, perhaps a slightly less wealthy nation than the likes of the UK. They are the first EU nation to order Russia’s vaccine, which I lie sceptical about. Something could easily go wrong over there preventing Sziget to take place.

So I still lie caution with 2021 festivals. For the sake of everyone on here, I hope glasto can find a way to go ahead, but I don’t think I’ll be quite ready to attend in 2021 myself.

Also the leaked nhs plan of everyone vaccinated by Easter I find unrealistic. 1 million per week seems feasible but still optimistic to me and with everyone requiring 2 doses it may take longer than expected. A timeline for April/May starting to ease restrictions but much looser in the summer feels more plausible to me. Nevertheless, an end to misery is in sight which is probably good for me, as I have been struggling the last couple of days and especially I’ve been worrying about this new tier system and Christmas rules which I fear are a massive mistake so close to the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

I’m prepared to sacrifice the likes of Taylor Swift and Kendrick Lamar if there is no travel from the US in favour of more homegrown bands. If US travel is off the cards then Elton may be available if his tour is put back again and possibly even Fleetwood Mac but I don’t think we’ll be that lucky. 

Today’s a great day - I can carry on being hopelessly optimistic so UK artists that need to reform for the greatest party in the best place on earth after the sh*ttiest year ....

Roger Waters, Dave Gilmour, Nick Mason/

Robert Plant, Jimmy Page, John Paul Jones

 

Still going and in the UK I think - NCATBS, though I’d certainly take Grinderman. 

Did Nick Cave move to Los Angeles - I think he’s still here along with Warren Ellis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
19 minutes ago, Havors said:

I guess you are not a gym goer.... its easy to make these statements from ignorance.

I'm not a gym goer, but I'm well aware that you don't need a gym to do exercise.

Just because it might not be your favourite form of exercise doesn't mean it's not exercise.

There's a pandemic, remember? That means measures have to be taken in order to control it, and when it's running out of control and there's no solid data about where the risks really are, it's better to err on the side of caution and not have places of contact open that people can manage without for a few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...