Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

I think the average is 70% so I guess it could be revised up?

Either way, happy Monday all!

We’re nearly there :)

Apprently it was up to 90% effective in one trial they did and they can't seem to work out why, hopefully we'll get a better idea ince the full trials are completed - seen people on Twitter mentioning that it will possibly appeal to more countries as it's far easier to store and also is more effective than the average flu jab 

Edited by Chapple12345
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
13 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

I think the average is 70% so I guess it could be revised up?

Either way, happy Monday all!

We’re nearly there :)

I'm guessing that (dependant on availability during roll-out), any of the less-effective vaccines will be used for the younger age ranges.

I also reckon that the UK will approve the Oxford vaccine before any other vaccine, and that it will be approved before 4th December (which is the earliest date for USA approval of the pfizer one). Spaffer is going to want to be world beating. ;) 

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

Apprently it was up to 90% effective in one trial they did and they can't seem to work out why, hopefully we'll get a better idea ince the full trials are completed - seen people on Twitter mentioning that it will possibly appeal to more countries as it's far easier to store and also is more effective than the average flu jab 

It was already the most ordered vaccine due to the reasons you mention. 
 

It’s also a fraction of the cost of the others so win win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

Apprently it was up to 90% effective in one trial they did and they can't seem to work out why, hopefully we'll get a better idea ince the full trials are completed - seen people on Twitter mentioning that it will possibly appeal to more countries as it's far easier to store and also is more effective than the average flu jab 

One of the leads has been on radio 4. The 90% effective dose was 2 doses over a period of a month. The first is 1/2 a dose and the second a full dose. Interestingly two full doses seemed to be less effective. 
 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I'm guessing that (dependant on availability during roll-out), any of the less-effective vaccines will be used for the younger age ranges.

I also reckon that the UK will approve the Oxford vaccine before any other vaccine, and that it will be approved before 4th December (which is the earliest date for USA approval of the pfizer one). Spaffer is going to want to be world beating. ;) 

Pfizer is already with the MHRA so that could be approved this week. I reckon that gets used for the NHS workers and vulnerable, rest of us gets the Oxford one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DeanoL said:

If you’re looking at the Christmas bubble thing saying “that doesn’t work for me” then that’s the point - it’s making you see less people. Christmas is normally four households so someone will be left alone? No they won’t, you do two groups of two.

Normally see multiple families over the course of that five days? That’s one of the worst things you can be doing in terms of spreading it, as secondary contacts go up exponentially. It stops you doing that because it’s meant to.

Reopening the pubs is utter madness though.

The people I can see this being a real mess for (assuming students are excluded) is young adults in house shares (or anyone else really), this rule effectively means you are all stuck together whereas students in a house share can go elsewhere? There is going to be so many arguments and mental stress for some people that can't be healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hancock referred to the dosage. Pollard has said that if people were given a half-dose first, followed by a full dose a month later, they had 90% protection. He told Today:

There is just a hint in the data at the moment that those who got that regime with higher protection, there is a suggestion that it was also able to reduce asymptomatic infection.

If that is right, we might be able to halt the virus in its tracks and stop transmitting between people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ashl said:

The people I can see this being a real mess for (assuming students are excluded) is young adults in house shares (or anyone else really), this rule effectively means you are all stuck together whereas students in a house share can go elsewhere? There is going to be so many arguments and mental stress for some people that can't be healthy. 

You think they won't all just go their separate ways like students are going to? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ashl said:

The people I can see this being a real mess for (assuming students are excluded) is young adults in house shares (or anyone else really), this rule effectively means you are all stuck together whereas students in a house share can go elsewhere? There is going to be so many arguments and mental stress for some people that can't be healthy. 

well, it's not going to be enforced at all...so it's just up to people to follow guidelines as much as they can....obviously not everyone will be able to, and also obviously some will just ignore the guidelines whilst singing fuck you I won't do what you tell me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnson is going to be insufferable about the Oxford virus, isn’t he?

Claiming it as if he was the one in the lab night after night...

And he’ll see an uptick in popularity. Yet the truth is the vaccine was developed in spite of him not because of anything he did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zoo Music Girl said:

Was household mixing allowed in any tier before? Tier 1 maybe with rule of six?

When do you think the tiers will get announced? Maybe next week just before lockdown ends?

When I say get announced, I mean which area is in which tier, not what each tier involves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Was household mixing allowed in any tier before? Tier 1 maybe with rule of six?

When do you think the tiers will get announced? Maybe next week just before lockdown ends?

Tier I was indoor settings with the rule of 6, Tier 2 was in places such a private gardens 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...