Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

Just now, Toilet Duck said:

But the Oxford vaccine won’t only be administered by the NHS surely? No issue using community pharmacists, higher education institutions and a whole lot more to roll that one out.

All done under the banner of the NHS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Copperface said:

All done under the banner of the NHS.

I don’t really know how the NHS works, so not sure what that means! (Maybe it just means NHS estimates are those for all vaccinations?). Basically a 2 shot vaccination programme for the at risk population is twice this year’s planned flu programme (aimed for 25m in 6-8 weeks...usually hits about 15m). I know it’s more complicated getting everyone in twice and there have been some software issues, but it shouldn’t take 8 months (mid summer) unless there are supply issues...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

I don’t really know how the NHS works, so not sure what that means! (Maybe it just means NHS estimates are those for all vaccinations?). Basically a 2 shot vaccination programme for the at risk population is twice this year’s planned flu programme (aimed for 25m in 6-8 weeks...usually hits about 15m). I know it’s more complicated getting everyone in twice and there have been some software issues, but it shouldn’t take 8 months (mid summer) unless there are supply issues...

And they don’t open up football stadiums etc to roll out the flu vaccine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe living in Leicester/O&W with restrictions/lockdowns/highest tier until today had got me so used to this shit for so long that we had already resigned ourselves to having only our household for Christmas this year even though we could have gone with the previous 5 day rule with 3 households. Regardless of what was allowed we didn’t feel comfortable with this relaxation anyway due to what would inevitably happen after Christmas. However, this works for us and I feel so sorry for others who had this change of plan dropped on them yesterday - its horrible and I really don’t know how I’d react if my circumstances were similar.

I really believe that this decision should have been made 3 weeks ago and as usual the government have f**cked it up again. I’m a bit cynical about the new variant, I believe it exists but it’s being used beyond its potential problems. A reason not to get too ‘spooked’ by the ‘mutant’ virus, if it was that more infectious it would have taken off in other regions as well since September - particularly South West on the graph on this tweet. Surely this variant would be at a much higher % by now in regions other than London, SE and East? I think that it’s being used to scare us all a bit, make the government look though they were forced to do this now rather than weeks ago and it’s the ‘mutant virus’ that’s stolen Christmas - not Boris the grinch. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toilet Duck said:

There’s almost enough Pfizer vaccine due next year to complete phase 1 (40m doses I think), but that would take most of the year to supply (Moderna would more or less cover the rest, but unlikely to be available til Easter). Approval of the Oxford vaccine shifts the timeframe to completion significantly though. As it happens, I was talking to one of the leads on the Oxford team during the week. Didn’t ask him outright when they expected approval as it would have been unprofessional (we were talking about something else, and anyway, it’s not his decision!) but they are very happy with where they are. When that’s available, no reason to think Phase 1 can’t be completed well before summer...Through summer and into autumn, it should be a drive to get lower risk individuals vaccinated before winter.

Thanks for restoring some sanity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Toilet Duck said:

Just packed up the teepee in my daughter’s room to make way for the inevitable pile of God only knows what she’ll accumulate this week (especially from my crazy sisters)...had a little pang and a fond reminisce about the part of the festival I like least (packing up and going home!)...c’mon Oxford, hurry up and get us all vaccinated!!

Hey TD, absolutely agree, hate hate hate that Monday morning but you know what, at the moment I’m longing for the prospect of it!!

Some articles in the press that approval will be on or before the 28th... (not sure how the telegraph could no this but let’s go with it.) given that 28th is a bank holiday im kind of discounting that so realistically how likely is it we might see something before Christmas? If you were a betting man and totally hypothetical, which date has your money? I’m gonna go 23rd (but had previously guessed 18th based purely on desperation)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello. I'm not a regular poster (especially after failing to get tickets for the last couple of years), but I've been following this thread throughout and this seemed like the best place to post this.

I've been invited to join one of the vaccine trials - the Janssen Ensemble 2 trial, which is testing a two dose regime of the vaccine that they've been testing with one dose for a while now. Really excited to be part of this research. I know that it's a 50% chance of getting a placebo, but I'm low on the list so not going to get anywhere near an approved vaccine until the second half of 2021 and, being relatively low risk, it seems like a good thing to do for all sorts of reasons. Anyway, I guess I just wanted to say that as well as the Pfizer and Oxford vaccines, there are still loads in development and things are going to definitely look different this time next year. It's shit at the moment and it's going to be shit for a while yet, but it's not forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SophieBee said:

Hello. I'm not a regular poster (especially after failing to get tickets for the last couple of years), but I've been following this thread throughout and this seemed like the best place to post this.

I've been invited to join one of the vaccine trials - the Janssen Ensemble 2 trial, which is testing a two dose regime of the vaccine that they've been testing with one dose for a while now. Really excited to be part of this research. I know that it's a 50% chance of getting a placebo, but I'm low on the list so not going to get anywhere near an approved vaccine until the second half of 2021 and, being relatively low risk, it seems like a good thing to do for all sorts of reasons. Anyway, I guess I just wanted to say that as well as the Pfizer and Oxford vaccines, there are still loads in development and things are going to definitely look different this time next year. It's shit at the moment and it's going to be shit for a while yet, but it's not forever.

go for it .... and thankyou ... without people doing the trials we would be nowhere near where we are now ..... hopefully you will enjoy better luck in the resale whenever that may be 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

The R0 of this new variant must be fucking huge if it’s causing this many cases despite fucking draconian restrictions. 

Tier 2 restrictions ..... which were struggling to halt the cases earlier on .... 

Edited by crazyfool1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

I don’t really know how the NHS works, so not sure what that means! (Maybe it just means NHS estimates are those for all vaccinations?). Basically a 2 shot vaccination programme for the at risk population is twice this year’s planned flu programme (aimed for 25m in 6-8 weeks...usually hits about 15m). I know it’s more complicated getting everyone in twice and there have been some software issues, but it shouldn’t take 8 months (mid summer) unless there are supply issues...

The NHS is complicated, but basically it comes down to money and public funding...

This years flu programme is aimed at twice the normal number, looking at about 25 million but take up is obviously different to that number. The 2 shot covid programme is on top of that.

There are supply issues with both at the moment. This delivery will ramp up over time but at the moment we are only getting about 140,00 per week based on the last two weeks figures - this will though increase substantially when AZ comes on stream.

So any projections have inbuilt slippage. Even based on a million per week, there is a current shortfall of 840,000 per week to add on to any projections. I'd think think that all going well, we might be up to full delivery capacity end of January?

42 mass vax hubs delivering between 2-5000 jabs per day each - about a million per week

1200 PCN hubs plus others  delivering about 1000 each per week= 1.2 million per week. 

So around two million may possibly be feasible, That's still 25 weeks. Clearly this is a bit elastic as so many variables are baked in. But that scale of rollout on top of the flu programme is going to take time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Paul ™ said:

@Toilet Duck I see the ORF1ab variant mentioned, yet I also see the term VUI-202012/01 (Variant Under Investigation) used.

Can you explain if they are the same or not, and if they are, why the naming difference? 

RF1ab

Hi Paul, ORF1ab is one of the viral genes (along with the N gene) that is checked for in the PCR test. The PCR test just checks to see if it’s there, however if we sequence the entire virus, we see variations in the sequence. Most of these are of no consequence, some could be and are kept under observation. So the different variants get given a name and if they turn up somewhere else, then it helps track the spread of the virus. The worry with this one is that is has a few changes that theoretically could influence how infectious it might be, but we really don’t have a definitive answer on that yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

Hi Paul, ORF1ab is one of the viral genes (along with the N gene) that is checked for in the PCR test. The PCR test just checks to see if it’s there, however if we sequence the entire virus, we see variations in the sequence. Most of these are of no consequence, some could be and are kept under observation. So the different variants get given a name and if they turn up somewhere else, then it helps track the spread of the virus. The worry with this one is that is has a few changes that theoretically could influence how infectious it might be, but we really don’t have a definitive answer on that yet. 

Thanks very much for explaining that, I get it now. Cheers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Copperface said:

The NHS is complicated, but basically it comes down to money and public funding...

This years flu programme is aimed at twice the normal number, looking at about 25 million but take up is obviously different to that number. The 2 shot covid programme is on top of that.

There are supply issues with both at the moment. This delivery will ramp up over time but at the moment we are only getting about 140,00 per week based on the last two weeks figures - this will though increase substantially when AZ comes on stream.

So any projections have inbuilt slippage. Even based on a million per week, there is a current shortfall of 840,000 per week to add on to any projections. I'd think think that all going well, we might be up to full delivery capacity end of January?

42 mass vax hubs delivering between 2-5000 jabs per day each - about a million per week

1200 PCN hubs plus others  delivering about 1000 each per week= 1.2 million per week. 

So around two million may possibly be feasible, That's still 25 weeks. Clearly this is a bit elastic as so many variables are baked in. But that scale of rollout on top of the flu programme is going to take time.

 

Will there be much flu vaccination going on in March/April though? I remember trying to get one in March one year as I was starting a new job in a cancer centre and could only find one GP in Dublin with any left! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Copperface said:

This years flu programme is aimed at twice the normal number, looking at about 25 million but take up is obviously different to that number. The 2 shot covid programme is on top of that.

the 2 shot programme of vaccine is not going to have much overlap with the flu vaccine ... maybe a few weeks but mostly the flu jabs are done and dusted now ... so they can go full steam at the covid jabs ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

Will there be much flu vaccination going on in March/April though? I remember trying to get one in March one year as I was starting a new job in a cancer centre and could only find one GP in Dublin with any left! 

🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

The R0 of this new variant must be fucking huge if it’s causing this many cases despite fucking draconian restrictions. 

I reckon the changed behaviour around Christmas is at least some part of this - all the additional shopping (and associated journeys) and most likely socialising will contribute to an extent, like I would expect even with this variant if this was October say it wouldn't be quite as bad. But it's still very very bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...