Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
8 hours ago, Phil200147 said:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/7908682/glasto-appearance-spice-girls/

 

Anyone seen this? Scary spice saying they are in talks to headline ... allegedly

I'll tell you what I want, what I really, really want.

Something else please Emily.

Perhaps they can headline the year that Take That and Westlife do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I'll tell you what I want, what I really, really want.

Something else please Emily.

Perhaps they can headline the year that Take That and Westlife do?

Take That don't even come close to the awful spice girls , least Barlow has an ounce of credibility in his back catalogue.

Sure it's just another act really wanting to play and using the media to ask Emily and Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

I'll tell you what I want, what I really, really want.

Something else please Emily.

Perhaps they can headline the year that Take That and Westlife do?

But........ but......... but they're different from Coldplay and Muse, so they must be good, right ?

 

34 minutes ago, brettredmayne said:

Take That don't even come close to the awful spice girls , least Barlow has an ounce of credibility in his back catalogue.

Sure it's just another act really wanting to play and using the media to ask Emily and Michael

Why would they need to ? I could be wrong - and frequently am - but I always assumed they would be crap live so why would they want to be at a televised festival taking less money than their stadium gigs ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Brave Sir Robin said:

It says “Mel B finally confirmed they are in talks with bosses Michael and Emily Eavis to headline the festival” but the only relevant quotes are:

Scary Spice said: “Glastonbury. It’s been talked about. But we’re so pop and it’s so cool — that’ll be funny to me.

I think Mel C would really appreciate us doing that — she’s the cool one. She’s the cool indie chick.”

Doesn’t sound like any actual talks with the fest to me, just if’s and maybe (the  “that’ll be” is contradicted but the “would” in the next sentence). Apparently it’s on Jessie Ware’s podcast, if anyone can be bothered to give that a listen.

Looks like Skint Spice is just trying to drum up some interest. Nothing to see here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gnomicide said:

Why does Christine and The Queens have everything apart from Chris scrubbed out on these posters? 

I know that sounds like an opening line from a joke but it's not, I'm just interested.

 

 

I think it's because the album is called "Chris"? But yeah, still doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Especially as all the posters use the APE design and fonts rather than the band's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kevbizarre said:

Does anyone think Emily will follow Primavera Sound with more prominent female artists?

LDR, Christine & the Queens and Robyn could all be good pyramid subs! 

Christine yes, the other 2 subbing Pyramid? Nah don't think so personally. It's all well and good promoting and giving more female acts a go but they have to be good enough also. Not to say Robyn and Larna arent good, they are. Just not that good in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Havors said:

Christine yes, the other 2 subbing Pyramid? Nah don't think so personally. It's all well and good promoting and giving more female acts a go but they have to be good enough also. Not to say Robyn and Larna arent good, they are. Just not that good in my opinion. 

Agree would be a bit of a leap with them, although not that much difference in terms of size to 2016 when Foals, Beck and Tame Impala all subbed. 

Can’t see Other having many female artists headliners! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kevbizarre said:

Agree would be a bit of a leap with them, although not that much difference in terms of size to 2016 when Foals, Beck and Tame Impala all subbed. 

Can’t see Other having many female artists headliners! 

Massive difference in them 3 to the 3 you mentioned I think from personal taste.... but I suppose success wise or spotify listeners wise they are along the same levels so I could understand them subbing. I just wouldn't want them to haha! Foals and Tame Impala are frigging awesome I think... both should be headlining Other stage at least next time they play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

Why does Christine and The Queens have everything apart from Chris scrubbed out on these posters? 

I know that sounds like an opening line from a joke but it's not, I'm just interested.

 

 

For this album she's adopted a male persona: Chris.

Seems to me an easy way to make the point while still avoiding confusion as to who's actually performing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, jparx said:

LDR and Christine yes. Robyn could do it, but it would be a better show headlining a different stage. I'm still going for Liam, Christine and LDR in that order.

I've got LDR down for third Pyramid in my predictions. Robyn for JP.

Not sure where Christine will place - Other headliner perhaps as an alternative to The Cure?

Edited by Hugh Jass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Riggins said:

Apologies if this had already been mentioned - I checked back a couple of pages, but Emily will be on Matt Wilkinson's Beast1 show this morning to 'preview the 2019 Glastonbury Festival'. 

Haven’t seen this mentioned anywhere.  Any ideas of times?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, kevbizarre said:

Agree would be a bit of a leap with them, although not that much difference in terms of size to 2016 when Foals, Beck and Tame Impala all subbed. 

Can’t see Other having many female artists headliners! 

Beck, really?

He did have a few platinum albums and a handful of grammys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

I've got LDR down for third Pyramid in my predictions. Robyn for JP.

Not sure where Christine will place - Other headliner perhaps as an alternative to The Cure?

Robyn for JP sounds good.

Who do you have as subs then instead? 

Edited by jparx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I generally find listening to radio shows where (a) the DJ is younger than me (b) they refer to new releases as “drops” and (C) refer to listeners as “you guys” hard enough at the best of times - this programme ticks all the fucking boxes and more.

Emily better announce The Beatles as Friday night West Holts headliners with Mozart as the Other Stage opener to make all of this worthwhile.

*insert Old Man Yells at Cloud gif*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...