Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

Of course they do, will be in the contracts.

Just say your promoting blur. You have hyde park tickets to sell and you don't want everyone to be aware of another show. A lot.of people going to glastonbury may buy blur tickets but wouldn't if it was nailed on for them to headline the festival.

What Matt said was individual headliner announcements. So if it's Blur and they sold out their gig instantly, that doesn't mean to say they would have been announced for Glastonbury in the following days because they don't need to sell any more tickets as that's not how it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

I think they like stringing everyone along, a game - In the past you suddenly got a page ad in NME with all the names but it was only when you arrived and bought a programme you knew who was playing when & where

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yeah, nobody's saying that it's not a case of them holding back announcements so that acts can sell their tickets. It's just a bit of a wild assumption to think that the remaining headliners are ones that haven't yet announced or sold out their dates because Foos have been announced and the others haven't.

an example for this would be if its Taylor swift, glastonbury would be irrelevant as her show at bst is over the glastonbury weekend (i know it is now sold out)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would hate that as someone who loves to plan everything in advanced! that would be my Wednesday taken up in my tent filling in a blank clashfinder or something!

Is their any chance it could be either Eminem or Outkast as a headliner? I know neither are on a tour at the moment but prehaps Glastonbury could draw them over as neither have headlined before?

Don't want either of them personally but just trying to think of new names...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd absolutely love just to turn up to Worthy and open up the programme to see the lineup.

However with the current arrival social media that the consumerist society is obsessed with I think that it'd fail to work. The programmes would have to be kept in a massive bunker in Siberia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would hate that as someone who loves to plan everything in advanced! that would be my Wednesday taken up in my tent filling in a blank clashfinder or something!

Is their any chance it could be either Eminem or Outkast as a headliner? I know neither are on a tour at the moment but prehaps Glastonbury could draw them over as neither have headlined before?

Don't want either of them personally but just trying to think of new names...

The impression I've got is that Eminem would never happen, that brings me to the Kanye point. Regardless of what he raps about, he doesn't spent most of his set just moaning about things and singing the same song 8 times.

Outkast isn't going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I'd love it as I know there's more to it than just the bands that play, but maybe £200+ quid, plus travel, plus gear, plus alcohol... is a little bit much of a gamble to ask most people to spend on a mystery line up... Maybe back in the day when you could all just pile in your mates van and drive without a ticket and still get in, but not these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I'd love it as I know there's more to it than just the bands that play, but maybe £200+ quid, plus travel, plus gear, plus alcohol... is a little bit much of a gamble to ask most people to spend on a mystery line up... Maybe back in the day when you could all just pile in your mates van and drive without a ticket and still get in, but not these days.

Eh? We have all paid for a ticket based on a mystery line up. We do every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh? We have all paid for a ticket based on a mystery line up. We do every year.

I meant by the time of balance payments, where we do know some of the lineup, with an option for some to give it a miss, and the time after that leading up to the festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provided all these names being thrown around have some weight coould we see something like this:

Foals > Foos

ELO > Stone Roses

Taylor > Kanye

This would be fucking fantastic if you ask me, great mix

I don't see Foals sub headlining the pyramid though, Other headliners I'm hoping

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The deposits have sold out. It's still a consideration to get people to pay off their ticket and keep people who missed out on their ticket interested.

I understand but surely the overwhelming majority of those people will have been to Glastonbury before so "know" it's not all about the line up as TitP & R&L are. I can't imagine many people not paying up.

I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand but surely the overwhelming majority of those people will have been to Glastonbury before so "know" it's not all about the line up as TitP & R&L are. I can't imagine many people not paying up.

I could be wrong.

For many people, the headers will still sell it etc. 2008 has gonw down as not a good year for the fest. I would imagine we are very much going to know the headers before the balance pay off period is over and the ticket resale.

Rappers only go down well topping certain events, not even Jay Z has returned since subbing T a few years back to headline it. And let's be honest, Eminem is in a different league and size here compared to Kanye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is now. It was him and Roy wood started it but Roy wood quit very early on. Maybe one album?

There were other permanent members but Jeff bought the name off bev bevan - the drummer - a few years ago so now it's just him.

Richard Tandy has been a constant since the early 70s, so he probably counts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For many people, the headers will still sell it etc. 2008 has gonw down as not a good year for the fest. I would imagine we are very much going to know the headers before the balance pay off period is over and the ticket resale.

Rappers only go down well topping certain events, not even Jay Z has returned since subbing T a few years back to headline it. And let's be honest, Eminem is in a different league and size here compared to Kanye.

Ok, do you reckon Kanye or Taylor Swift would be more controversial?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant by the time of balance payments, where we do know some of the lineup, with an option for some to give it a miss, and the time after that leading up to the festival.

The deposit scheme is a really new thing, no one cared before, why would they now?

You're probably right though, I suppose it's just another example of the precious mindset of the crowd these days

Edited by russycarps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...