Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Oasis


Guest

Recommended Posts

Had Chicago tickets in the basket this morning - three failed credit card payments, a failed debit card payment (error code U533), and then PayPal failing.

 

PayPal, specifically, saying it's due to the billing address. I've bought countless tickets for the US in the past from my bank cards - this has never been an issue.

 

Mind-boggling. Waiting to hear back from my bank + TM support, but I suspect it'll be nonsense.

 

If ever there was a sign... 🤦‍♂️

Edited by mufcok
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Watergirl said:

A word from Dublin. I tried and tried but it wasn't to be. At one point I had a €550 ticket in the basket, but couldn't justify the price. Instead, I did an extra shift at work this weekend, so as to not sit at home moping. On Sunday I finished work at 20:30, and it was a beautiful evening so I decided to cycle over to Croke Park. I was one of the many standing outside the stadium, singing along. There was a really nice atmosphere; all easy-going. I tried two spots. In the first the singing was so loud I couldn't hear the band too well. Then I found a quieter street, with a smaller number of people standing around; some folks sitting out in their front gardens. I heard the last eight songs and saw the fireworks. 
I had to be in town again yesterday and the city centre was still awash with Oasis T-shirts. And an explosion of happy posts on social media, from the sign language interpreter going viral to the gardaí posting what a wonderful weekend it was. I am not exaggerating when I say these concerts have really lifted people's spirits. And very much a cross-generational audience. It's the reunion music didn't realize it needed.

 

 

 

This is mad. Must be over 1000 people there - never seen something like that for a gig before - is it a regular thing that im just not aware of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SouthbanKen said:

 

This is mad. Must be over 1000 people there - never seen something like that for a gig before - is it a regular thing that im just not aware of?

There were loads. There are many approach roads to Croke Park and there were people at all of them. I was on my bicycle so went to find a quieter spot, as I actually wanted to hear the band.
It's something people do at gigs, but usually only a small number. I think with Oasis it has been happening everywhere. I saw reports from Manchester. It was just so hard to get tickets for these shows, and for people with ordinary salaries the ticket price was prohibitive, unless you were lucky enough to get face value or those last minute restricted view tickets (I tried that too....).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, richarddep said:

Was at Croke Park in Dublin on Saturday evening. I was completely blown away - probably the best gig I've ever been to.

 

I don't think there exists another band that can deliver a 24 song playlist of wall-to-wall hits like them. It was unreal and so well paced as a set. Absolutely loved it.

I think when you catch a big band/artist doing a greatest hits set, it feels different to when you catch them on an album tour (unless you are really looking for deep cuts). Blur's pyramid headline set was the same, wall to wall hits, Pulp this year, ditto the Stones (saw them on the 40 licks tour as well and it was just one banger after another), McCartney could do multiple nights of wall to wall hits, U2 can easily bang out a set of back to back bona fide hits if they chose to, Coldplay etc etc. I walked away from Ash at Avalon this year thinking, crikey, I forgot how many great songs they had (not that I'm comparing them to this Oasis tour!)...Having said all that, brother in law was at the Saturday show and said they were awesome (and he's not given to over-praising anyone). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to Liam and Noel at these gigs, they’re genuinely loving it and almost making peace with some things they’ve said and done before.

 

I think they’ll take up a Glasto 2027 offer to make amends for 2004 too. Say what you want but they both do love making and performing music, and are nowhere near too old. Im pretty sure they’ll be Saturday slot and happy to do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, O'Doyle Rules said:

Listening to Liam and Noel at these gigs, they’re genuinely loving it and almost making peace with some things they’ve said and done before.

 

I think they’ll take up a Glasto 2027 offer to make amends for 2004 too. Say what you want but they both do love making and performing music, and are nowhere near too old. Im pretty sure they’ll be Saturday slot and happy to do it. 

 

Don't forget 1995.

That was sh*t too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, philipsteak said:

 

Don't forget 1995.

That was sh*t too.

They always seem to blow the big gigs though. Noel has admitted that himself. Maybe they just don't get the same buzz from a neutral crowd. Glastonbury atmosphere probably wouldn't even be as good as Gallagher hill 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, plaskins said:

They always seem to blow the big gigs though. Noel has admitted that himself. Maybe they just don't get the same buzz from a neutral crowd. Glastonbury atmosphere probably wouldn't even be as good as Gallagher hill 

I think with social media plugging the gigs everywhere this year, you’d have near an Elton size crowd. One of those “need to be there” headliners. 
 

What is making me laugh about these gigs is the rest of the band doing city tours with barely anyone noticing/bothering them. Probably the dream situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, O'Doyle Rules said:

I think with social media plugging the gigs everywhere this year, you’d have near an Elton size crowd. One of those “need to be there” headliners. 
 

What is making me laugh about these gigs is the rest of the band doing city tours with barely anyone noticing/bothering them. Probably the dream situation.


From Bonehead’s Instagram page, him, Andy and Gem are having the best time. Joey makes the occasional cameo in his photos, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Andy0808 v5 said:

This is one of the Manchester dates on that leaked Europe and UK part 2 list that went round the other week.

 

Very strange, must be close to an announcement if those dates and an EU tour does happen now.


That Rolls Royce in a swimming pool stunt in Plymouth (?) is rumoured to have something to do with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

A friend was at Toronto last night and described it as a religious experience.

thats not possible beucase i was told only in england could you get that experience.

 

 

 

10 hours ago, MK1 said:

1000100167.thumb.jpg.b8f9aac01fca7152b7c81a3d1600c218.jpg

suuuuuure. paris gets one night on paper when it easily would be 2? why only hamburg? why all the diff fonts? why prague to throw in a logistics issue? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Suprefan said:

thats not possible beucase i was told only in england could you get that experience.

 

 

 

suuuuuure. paris gets one night on paper when it easily would be 2? why only hamburg? why all the diff fonts? why prague to throw in a logistics issue? 

No idea but Zegut is usually a good source....

Edited by MK1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...