Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

 

Yes, but its not without punishment - for getting the slot wrong - Everton have been deducted 10 points - its the only fair way to resolve 

Even as an ever suffering Evertonian, I'd take this all day long if it meant Neil on the farm haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gfa said:

sure - but the person i quoted directly compared him to macca and elton

Apologies for any confusion, wasn't stating that I think Neil would have crowds as big as Macca or Elton. More that as a live act he's aged more gracefully, particularly in the case of the latter

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, beesboy said:

Suspect I'll be happily avoiding the Pyramid the entire weekend unless they pull something out of the bag. 

Nothing wrong with that. I only watched one act at the Pyramid this year (Little Simz), and one on the Other (Disclosure), but didn't feel like I missed out on anything by not hanging around those stages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

 

Yes, but its not without punishment - for getting the slot wrong - Everton have been deducted 10 points - its the only fair way to resolve 

 

They're drawing lines along the Pyramid slots now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone able to provide reassurance that some of these 6 main headliners are wrong? Think they're all probably good bookings outside of Loyle but just don't do anything for me sadly! If they are correct, it'll be a nice chance for me to explore other stages headliner slots, but just curiously excited atm!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ac123 said:

Anyone able to provide reassurance that some of these 6 main headliners are wrong? Think they're all probably good bookings outside of Loyle but just don't do anything for me sadly! If they are correct, it'll be a nice chance for me to explore other stages headliner slots, but just curiously excited atm!

theres always a bit of a chance something changes , as it has over the last month or so with some being ruled out / in .... this year seems the most changeable in the years ive been on here .... but might be that its now the correct ones ... can never be 100% sure as sometimes things change last minute 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Crazyfool01 said:

theres always a bit of a chance something changes , as it has over the last month or so with some being ruled out / in .... this year seems the most changeable in the years ive been on here .... but might be that its now the correct ones ... can never be 100% sure as sometimes things change last minute 

Cool, thanks! Holding out hope for Stevie Wonder/Rihanna to surprise us all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Don1 said:

Neil Young in 2009 was unreal - praying he is a headliner this year. Miles better than Springsteen the following day.

 

*Blur blew both of them out the water though.

That is definitely how I felt.  NY was miles better than Springsteen but then Blur was one of my favourite Pyramid headliners ever.

 

Most other years I think NY would have been the standout Pyramid headliner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hilarious thing about Neil Young is that 15 years ago people were saying the exact same thing as if it was some badge of honour - "I couldn't name a single Neil Young song if I tried!"

 

His popularity hasn't increased in this time, he hasn't had any hits, but nor has it waned. He didn't really help himself by leaving Spotify for a few years, and you'll rarely hear his music in any films or on TV, but that's why he is so legendary - he has remained true to his muse and his art. I would argue he was once the perfect Glastonbury act, but the festival has changed a lot in the past 15 years.

 

In my opinion he's not far off The Cure in terms of status - a few well-known songs, but ultimately an enormous following of dedicated and committed fans.

 

Take this with a pinch of salt, but it's my belief (through various friends who really aren't trustworthy!) that the Eavis's were after Neil Young & Crazy Horse for many years.

 

If he is indeed booked for 2025, my guess would be that CH were booked, but due to illness within the camp, Neil has had to come up with an alternative backing band quickly, hence the emergence of the Chrome Hearts. Promise of the Real are on an extended hiatus, which is a shame as although Chrome Hearts are fantastic (and essentially POTR anyway), I think POTR would have been the perfect choice nowadays.

 

For any doubters, no, you probably won't know many songs, but there was a time that wasn't the point. If you want to listen only to songs you know, in the order that you've already seen on setlist.fm, you can easily stay at home and listen to Spotify.

 

I reckon he'd nail it. Again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2009 was my first Glastonbury and Neil my first headliner. People may not have known his songs, but when he played "Rocking in the Free World" he had that crowd in his hand.
I got my ticket to see Bruce not understanding Glastonbury at the time. He was only OK, one of his weaker gigs and I've seen him a few times. Blur were of course amazing.

If Neil plays again I'll be back, shifts permitting. Have to support my countryman 🙂

Edited by ukmountie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gnomicide said:

Wordle knows.

Thanks. Hadn’t done it when i read this. Got one of those rare ‘first go’ ones 😇

Edited by chuckles07
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ukmountie said:

2009 was my first Glastonbury and Neil my first headliner. People may not have known his songs, but when he played "Rocking in the Free World" he had that crowd in his hand.
I got my ticket to see Bruce not understanding Glastonbury at the time. He was only OK, one of his weaker gigs and I've seen him a few times. Blur were of course amazing.

If Neil plays again I'll be back, shifts permitting. Have to support my countryman 🙂

It was my first one too, I missed Neil Young for Doves but thought that song sounded amazing on the tv. I've never really delved further into his music to be honest. I will do if he gets confirmed though. 

 

Agree on Bruce, and Blur was that "Glastonbury moment" that hooked me into going every time I get the chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really want it to be Young. I was torn between watching him, Doves, QTip or Ray Davies on the Friday in 2009 and instead I saw a secret 5th choice-getting far too twatted. I saw the Youngster open with Into the Black and remember almost nothing else.

 

Idiot.

 

Anyway if it is him I’m there, though I agree with those that say if it’s Charlie XCX on the Other she’ll have a much bigger crowd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I really loved about Neil Young's set in 2009, watching on TV, was the extent to which he was leading the band on a somewhat unplanned journey. Of course they had their setlist, but songs would clearly flex and bend according to NY's mood. Rockin' in the Free World was the most obvious example: it featured several false endings, and at the end of each one it was all eyes on the boss to see if he wanted another reprise. To me this is the essence of live music - that the band should not just be playing but creating, reacting to each other and the audience - but it's really rare these days to actually find it, particularly on the main stage of a big festival, and thrilling when you do.

 

I've loved Neil Young since I first discovered him about 25 years ago. I've seen him once, in Hammersmith in 2008, but for reasons unknown I really don't have strong memories of it. I'd say I'm ready for a refresher. But for all that I'd expect Charli XCX to have a significantly bigger crowd if they end up playing at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Looother said:

What I really loved about Neil Young's set in 2009, watching on TV, was the extent to which he was leading the band on a somewhat unplanned journey. Of course they had their setlist, but songs would clearly flex and bend according to NY's mood. Rockin' in the Free World was the most obvious example: it featured several false endings, and at the end of each one it was all eyes on the boss to see if he wanted another reprise. To me this is the essence of live music - that the band should not just be playing but creating, reacting to each other and the audience - but it's really rare these days to actually find it, particularly on the main stage of a big festival, and thrilling when you do.

 

I've loved Neil Young since I first discovered him about 25 years ago. I've seen him once, in Hammersmith in 2008, but for reasons unknown I really don't have strong memories of it. I'd say I'm ready for a refresher. But for all that I'd expect Charli XCX to have a significantly bigger crowd if they end up playing at the same time.

That’s so true, yet there’s very few big acts who dare do improvisation, I can only think of Dylan - to variable success - or Springsteen. Most stick to the safety of a well rehearsed setlist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, archiegow said:

Defo think it’ll be someone in that field, if not Jack then someone like a Nick Cave, Biffy, Pulp or Phonics.


If it’s Pulp then I’d argue they’ve got them the wrong way round. Much more generational crossover / singalong potential than Neil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...