Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, westholtschic said:

0%  Monkeys personally thought they were dire at Reading last year

100% Guns and Roses. Will put my nightmare to bed of missing Slash in 2010 to watch the football 

100% Elton. Still can’t believe we have him at the farm.

I sacrificed football and had one of the best afternoons I've had at the festival watching Slash and Ray Davies. My then 10 year old daughter is on the video signing along to Sweet Child of Mine at our first ever Glastonbury. She is now 22, and we have attended most years since including last year, and have tickets for this year.

I saw Guns n Roses for the first time last year and i would watch them again, however guess it depends if Prodigy are up against them.

I saw AM at Leeds last year and it was a good sing along, though same again happy to see who is up against them.

Elton is a must see for me, just hoping Prodigy or QoTSA clash with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Radiochicken said:

The same thought process happened to me when they played Reading Festival in 2010. Unmissable I thought. Even if it’s a shambles I thought. 

Turns out…

It was just fucking shit.

Even the shambolic quality to it was boring. Never again.

That was Axl and chums though as opposed to Slash and Duff. But they haven't been anywhere near as good since Adler left. In 1990. All downhill since then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Nal said:

Arctic Monkeys headlining the festival for the 3rd time in 12 festivals is super low energy.

GnR is very risky. Could be great, could be a shambles or Axl could throw a hissy and be late and/or walk off or thump someone in the front row. Unmissable either way. 

I saw him fill in for Brian Johnson with AC/DC and he arrived on stage on time, and performed well. 

This will be a big gig for them, and i would expect them to bring their A Game and surprise people.

I saw them at Tottenham Stadium and they have so many hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AM 25(50)%
Seen them twice now and their recent output doesn't really interest me muchbut would go if the majority of my group do.
GnR 0%
Early trip to SE corner sounds good that night but hoping for Prodigy or Chemical Brothers on Other.
Elton 0(50)%
Only know a few of the obvious hits but could be tempted to go if there really isn't anything on elsewhere and I don't catch a headliner on the first two nights.

Fairly uninspiring set of headliners for me but hopeful that they'll be enough closing the other main stages to take my fancy. This will be my third Glastonbury so I'm not going to complain as I've still got plenty of the site still to discover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arctic Monkeys 80% - Pretty dull at Leeds last year but would be happy to see them with a less aggy crowd and play the new songs (especially with strings if that rumour is true)

Guns ‘N’ Roses 0% - hope whoever goes enjoys it but only enjoy the big songs. Plus he clearly can’t sing anymore and they haven’t released music in many many years so not sure how there is demand to see them.

Elton John 50% - Not my bag at all but I imagine it would be a great show. Lots of love for him on here which actually has made me more keen to give him a go. The talk of special guests is icing on the cake too.

 

The Prodigy definitely clears any headline act that’s on if they’re headlining The Other Stage. Saw them at Brixton this year and were euphoric as ever. Hoping they’re against GnR.

Edited by Pr0paneNightm4re
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, theglastokid said:

Elton - He was playing small cricket grounds a few years back so not sure why some are saying it's a massive coup?

 

Multiple number ones in the past couple of years, massive resurgence, farewell tour extended because the shows are actually delivering (despite what some think).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pr0paneNightm4re said:

Arctic Monkeys 80% - Pretty dull at Leeds last year but would be happy to see them with a less aggy crowd and play the new songs (especially with strings if that rumour is true)

Guns ‘N’ Roses 0% - hope whoever goes enjoys it but only enjoy the big songs. Plus he clearly can’t sing anymore and they haven’t released music in many many years so not sure how there is demand to see them.

Elton John 50% - Not my bag at all but I imagine it would be a great show. Lots of love for him on here which actually has made me more keen to give him a go. The talk of special guests is icing on the cake too.

 

The Prodigy definitely clears any headline act that’s on if they’re headlining The Other Stage. Saw them at Brixton this year and were euphoric as ever. Hoping they’re against GnR.

That prodigy gig at Brixton was insane!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, topmarksbri said:

What festivals have got strong(er) set of headliners this year? Primavera is all I can think. There's just not a lot of people on tour. 

Don’t think they have either.  If you picked their 3 biggest acts are they bigger than these 3?! Doubt it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Not keen on these stale, blokey headliners - gonna go see QOTSA and The Prodigy instead.

Whilst I get the sentiment, (and I apologise if this has already been covered) surely we aren’t roping Elton in with this. Whilst gender diversity is important, I think he might be the first openly gay headliner since Michael Stipe fronted REM (unless I’ve forgot someone obvious, or just did not realise someone’s orientation and I’m sorry)

You’d have thought he was a dark fruit ladzladzladz act the way some people on here are talking about him. (Not you personally, just throwing a general point out) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Wouldn’t be against seeing that if the pricing was reasonable.

100% not gonna be reasonable. Can’t remember what her pricing was last time she toured but I’m guessing it wasn’t cheap, and this being billed as a greatest hits tour is sure to add an extra couple of quid on top of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...