Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Source on the Inforoo board in the Coachella thread says the headliners for Coachella are Dua Lipa, Frank Ocean and Kendrick Lamar.

Is this where Dua emerges as an option?

Yes. I reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, clasher said:

Yes. I disagree with both statements, however the reason is probably the general consensus of their live shows being a major  snoozefest (I agree with that completely).  It's by no means a weak booking, but perhaps rather underwhelming. Somewhat similar to potential bookings of Eminem and GnR. I say somewhat similar because AM are clearly far more current and relevant, but have - unlike the other two - already headlined. All of those would probably leave much to be desired for a big part of the crowd.

If the other two headliners are GNR and Elton they'll draw the biggest of the three headline crowds. I agree they are dogshit live but they'll always be a massive draw.

2 hours ago, FrancisH said:

 

Just to clarify that was probably poor wording on my part. I just meant the last two albums haven't gone down too well and live shows not much better - And I really like AM, I like last two albums, they're massive! I just think this lounge thing, as much as I like it, doesn't seem sustainable for festival headliner status.

AM are at a similar point to Radiohead, RHCP, Green Day, Coldplay, Foo Fighters, Metallica or Muse, and also Oasis in their later years, in the way that them being past their best won't matter so much as they'll always reach number one and sell out every gig they play, and headline every festival they play. And with maybe the exception of Radiohead, the general consensus is that all those bands are past their best yet they always shift colossal sized units and draw huge crowds at every festival, even if it's mostly normies who are "there for the bangers".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LoveAndTheft said:

Very strong rumours the headliners and 2nd top of the bill will be:

Friday - Artic Monkeys / Pulp

Saturday - Taylor Swift / Peter Kay

Sunday - Paul McCartney / Blur

That is mad as a box of frogs. 

Hats off to whoever put that combination together. The idea that a comedian would appear on the Pyramid at night, let alone before her would be very amusing. 

Plus there are other acts you think "err aren't they supposed to be lined up for other years?" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt42 said:

Source on the Inforoo board in the Coachella thread says the headliners for Coachella are Dua Lipa, Frank Ocean and Kendrick Lamar.

Is this where Dua emerges as an option?

If it's accurate for sure.

Hope Frank does a UK date, hopefully at APE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt42 said:

No it’s so stupidly off I won’t even engage with it. 

Fair enough. I stand by it. And if it happens, she’ll rise to the occasion and smash it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Accurate or not that’s a banging headline trio in 2023. The Americans get all the good stuff.

I think we had a better headlining trio than Coachella this year tbf, outside of Billie obvs. I don't rate Dua that much, she seemed a bit meh at Primavera this year but she deserves a headline slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Source on the Inforoo board in the Coachella thread says the headliners for Coachella are Dua Lipa, Frank Ocean and Kendrick Lamar.

Is this where Dua emerges as an option?

It is, but I don't think she'll be at Glasto, at least not next year. I also didn't know she was that big in America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, scatteredscreens said:

I think we had a better headlining trio than Coachella this year tbf, outside of Billie obvs. I don't rate Dua that much, she seemed a bit meh at Primavera this year but she deserves a headline slot.

Tbh I’m not comparing it to Glastonbury levels but if I was going to a festival and they were the headliners I’d be very happy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Source on the Inforoo board in the Coachella thread says the headliners for Coachella are Dua Lipa, Frank Ocean and Kendrick Lamar.

Is this where Dua emerges as an option?

If the info is solid and she’s actually touring then yeah.

She was always going to play on the next tour. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, VCK said:

AM are at a similar point to Radiohead, RHCP, Green Day, Coldplay, Foo Fighters, Metallica or Muse, and also Oasis in their later years, in the way that them being past their best won't matter so much as they'll always reach number one and sell out every gig they play.

The Car didn't actually get to No. 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, briddj said:

The Car didn't actually get to No. 1.

Only because they decided to release it on the same day as T Swift and clearly weren’t bothered about missing out. It outsold Tranqulity Base, and would have reached #1 in any other week bar about 2/3 (Ed, Adele , ABBA) in the last 5 years. 
 

so it doesn’t really say much about their popularity declining.

Edited by WhoOdyssey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Accurate or not that’s a banging headline trio in 2023. The Americans get all the good stuff.

So for once the line up is "cool" til everyone says the undercard is shite cause it doesnt contain anyone that made music in 1996.

 

Speaking of  a headliner, Adele started her residency.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Suprefan said:

So for once the line up is "cool" til everyone says the undercard is shite cause it doesnt contain anyone that made music in 1996.

 

Speaking of  a headliner, Adele started her residency.

 

Your comments on anyone commenting on Coachella are hilarious. It comes across that you need to protect it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass II said:

If Dua is indeed at Coachella then she definitely has to be a strong contender.

Will she have new material by next June? Would be a shame if she’s stepping out on El Pointo supporting an album that’ll be three years old by then.

Nobody cared at the sold out arena tour ( and stadiums ) that she was supporting a 2 year old album. If Dua is there in April it could be similar to Harry and its the launch of album 3. So maybe 2 or 3 new songs mixed into a set similar to the tour she just did plus guests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Suprefan said:

Nobody cared at the sold out arena tour ( and stadiums ) that she was supporting a 2 year old album. If Dua is there in April it could be similar to Harry and its the launch of album 3. So maybe 2 or 3 new songs mixed into a set similar to the tour she just did plus guests.

The sold out arena tour that was part of the Future Nostalgia tour? The one that was meant to coincide with the album’s launch but was heavily delayed due to a global pandemic? That one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...