Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, kalifire said:

On what basis? Has there been any extra evidence other than the relatively flimsy basis they’re already rumoured? 

- Roughbloke heard two sets of headliners AM, GNR, Elton and AM, GNR, Taylor. AM and GNR look to be the consistent.
- GNR rumoured for PinkPop (Netherlands), Frienze Rocks (Italy) the week before Glastonbury.
- People on festileaks (European efests equivalent) are openly discussing GNR as being active on the European festival circuit.
- Media articles
- Bookies odds
- and the best source in the AM (who leaks absolutely everything AM related) is saying they are headlining the Friday.

If you are looking for absolute concrete evidence, no we don’t. We can’t source the contracts or get it straight from Glastonbury. But that’s not the standard we have to aim for. We’ve all been doing this for a while and know the signs to spot when discussing likely headliners. It just looks more and more like they are lining up a European festival tour and there is a UK festival date in that. They aren’t at Download, IOW, BST, or whatever. 

To me it looks like a done deal.

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, chazwwe said:

No, nothing, Matt always does this. One rumour and they're a lock if he thinks it fits. Eminem and Rhianna have also been rumoured to the same level. 

This is very disingenuous if you want to say I’m being overly presumptive by being confident for AM and GNR? We’ve had way more than just one rumour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass II said:

If Dua is indeed at Coachella then she definitely has to be a strong contender.

Will she have new material by next June? Would be a shame if she’s stepping out on El Pointo supporting an album that’ll be three years old by then.

She's probably got a whole album ready to go. I didn't think she was available for glastonbury, but it'd be an easy fit for all parties involved if she is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

They almost certainly tried tried to book the original three for last year and given how early Billie was announced Taylor must have said no early on and they jumped on Billie as soon as it became apparent she was available.

Given Emily’s comments about Taylor she’ll have first refusal every year until she finally does it. Dua feels the natural reserve for next year if she’s about.

We’re obviously working months behind what conversations glastonbury / people in the biz are having. If we get accurate nuggets of info it’s fed through to us probably months after the issue is resolved.

Locking in massive acts require a crazy amount of pre-preparation. I think Billie signed for 2022 around late summer 2021, so it’s not crazy to say that Taylor would have let them know a year or so in advance that she wasn’t going to be around Summer 2022. And vice versa for 2023. It wouldn’t have stopped Glastonbury having conversations with Billie on the side.

What I’m saying is it wouldn’t surprise me if they held a slot for her for a substantial period of time. If they thought she was going to do the same thing for 2023, I’d expect they would still have ongoing talks with alternatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Padjeq said:

She's probably got a whole album ready to go. I didn't think she was available for glastonbury, but it'd be an easy fit for all parties involved if she is.

The Future Nostalgia tour wrapped up the other day. So it wouldn’t be a shock to see her take now till April off and have a few singles ready. I think Harry did the exact same thing this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coachella just seems full of pretentious LA influencers and hipsters who are there for "like, the vibes" and the line up nowadays is just whatever is trending on TikTok.

Lollapalooza always looks like the better American festival and caters to a more wide range of music fans. Not many festivals in the world you get both Metallica and Dua Lipa headlining in the same year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also @kalifire just looked at festileaks forum to see what they’ve been talking about. Probably one for the next announcement thread.

GNR could be announced in December for the following festivals;

- PinkPop (Netherlands) 16-18 June
- Firenze Rocks (Italy) was same weekend as Pinkpop last year but dates TBC
- Grasspop (Belgium) 15-18 June.

Will GNR be the first confirmed headliner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, VCK said:

Coachella just seems full of pretentious LA influencers and hipsters who are there for "like, the vibes" and the line up nowadays is just whatever is trending on TikTok.

Lollapalooza always looks like the better American festival and caters to a more wide range of music fans. Not many festivals in the world you get both Metallica and Dua Lipa headlining in the same year.

It is very much now that is why. But we can't say Glastonbury is not going the same way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Freddyflintstonree said:

Wasn't there someone on here saying it absolutely categorically would not be GnR headlining? 

There were a few, me included - just based on a gut feeling really though, but those festival dates look preeeetty ominous. 

personally that's a dreadful booking if so, but obviously not gonna go as far as say they don't deserve it as they are without doubt one of the biggest bands going. They're just proper shite (in my opinion).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Think Am, GNR, Dua more likely.

AM and GNR feel close to a lock.

As much as Axl and the lads are a bit of a surprise, it does feel like a very Glastonbury trio. Massive rock band, big heritage act and one of the biggest pop stars around. Pretty similar to 2015, 2017 and 2019. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kingcrawler said:

As much as Axl and the lads are a bit of a surprise, it does feel like a very Glastonbury trio. Massive rock band, big heritage act and one of the biggest pop stars around. Pretty similar to 2015, 2017 and 2019. 

Two first time headliners, with one being a new headliner and one a heritage headliner. It does fit the mould.

Also achieves that glastonbury thing of getting three big headliners without necessarily breaking the bank. I can see all three acts agreeing to the glasto normal fee.

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt42 said:

- Roughbloke heard two sets of headliners AM, GNR, Elton and AM, GNR, Taylor. AM and GNR look to be the consistent.
- GNR rumoured for PinkPop (Netherlands), Frienze Rocks (Italy) the week before Glastonbury.
- People on festileaks (European efests equivalent) are openly discussing GNR as being active on the European festival circuit.
- Media articles
- Bookies odds
- and the best source in the AM (who leaks absolutely everything AM related) is saying they are headlining the Friday.

If you are looking for absolute concrete evidence, no we don’t. We can’t source the contracts or get it straight from Glastonbury. But that’s not the standard we have to aim for. We’ve all been doing this for a while and know the signs to spot when discussing likely headliners. It just looks more and more like they are lining up a European festival tour and there is a UK festival date in that. They aren’t at Download, IOW, BST, or whatever. 

To me it looks like a done deal.

Thanks, came here to ask this exact thing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dotdash79 said:

Do you think the festival is purposely driving it that way or it’s just being dragged there by the attendees?

Not sure the festival is purposefully driving it that way, although they're definately driving it to be more safe/mainstream/family friendly (the latter is okay). The main drive though is the influence of the attendees, who are definately pushing it that way and I'm not sure what GFL can do to stop it, that's if they even want to stop it. This has been going on for a very long, since the mid/late 90's and has gained an almost unstopable momentum of its own.

There's still a part of the festival that rails against this, but these folks ain't getting any younger and will eventually "die" out, in some cases literally. Let's hope some of the youth can take up the mantle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could it be that GnR are the legend slot? I know Neil thinks it’s Roxy Music but they just seem too small/lacking in singalong hits to be right for that slot to me. GnR feel a much better fit for that slot to me given the singalong anthems they have

That way Elton, Dua and GnR could all be on the lineup (assuming AM already locked in). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...