Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

 

It will almost definitely change to "when everyone is FULLY vaccinated" then most likely to "when everyone has had a booster against the Brazilian and SA variants". The scientists most likely always wanted it this way, and they generally, with a delay, get what they want. 

I still think we won't get past the mid May restriction lifting

Possibly, but that hasn't happened yet and isn't what the Scientist was saying in their tweet. They certainly don't want to keep everyone locked down forever as has been said, that's just being over-the-top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, zahidf said:

So they arent being honest with us? 

Behavioural management. I'm not going to start spouting conspiracy theories again if that's what you're baiting me to do. 

Same way Christmas was on til it wasn't, same way it was going to be over by October and it wasn't etc. Over promise and go back on it later, buying some more time.

Reasons? Because the scientists say its not over just when little England has finished it's vaccinations. We can argue all day over whether it's too cautious or not but I don't feel it was ever realistic for the scientists to back full lifting in June, and people having hope keeps the scenes like yesterday small. 

Now we have newspapers hinting at this sort of thing and the 1922 committee "warning" against extensions (surely they've heard whisperings? They're better connected than any journalist) it just feels like they're leaving the breadcrumbs again for what's coming.

All just very predictable. Probably the last time now though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still so baffled why everyone is banging on about foreign holidays. We all know exactly what the situation is, and it hasn't changed for a while. Book a package deal if you like and you're covered, book a holiday separately and you take the risk. Why do we have to keep asking every govt minister/opposition MP whether or not they would book a holiday? It's a very simple situation we're in right now...we just wait and see where we're at in a couple months. There is no answer right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

I can see your point.  So masks on the tube in winter but rest of the year no masks.  That would feel reasonable.

Probably can't hurt to keep flu down as well in that time, any little to help the strain on hospitals. Though that could be a better argument for supermarkets and pharmacies to stop it actually being spread to those who are mainly affected by it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

A week tomorrow we can see people outdoors again (and as this is pre-local election, this part of the roadmap won’t change...). Let’s focus on the positives - we are getting there!

Indeed mate, it's not long and we can enjoy some nice beers with friends again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

Behavioural management. I'm not going to start spouting conspiracy theories again if that's what you're baiting me to do. 

Same way Christmas was on til it wasn't, same way it was going to be over by October and it wasn't etc. Over promise and go back on it later, buying some more time.

Reasons? Because the scientists say its not over just when little England has finished it's vaccinations. We can argue all day over whether it's too cautious or not but I don't feel it was ever realistic for the scientists to back full lifting in June, and people having hope keeps the scenes like yesterday small. 

Now we have newspapers hinting at this sort of thing and the 1922 committee "warning" against extensions (surely they've heard whisperings? They're better connected than any journalist) it just feels like they're leaving the breadcrumbs again for what's coming.

All just very predictable. Probably the last time now though 

I agree with the gist of what you're saying, but if we reach June and we've vaccinated most/all adults with 1 shot and a big chunk with both, hell even I'd be tempted to go down and protest if they looked to extend the restrictions (to be clear, I don't consider "masks and wash your hands" as restrictions). If they've been looking to buy time and keep the public onside by dangling carrots, I think they've potentially used that up now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

Behavioural management. I'm not going to start spouting conspiracy theories again if that's what you're baiting me to do. 

Same way Christmas was on til it wasn't, same way it was going to be over by October and it wasn't etc. Over promise and go back on it later, buying some more time.

Reasons? Because the scientists say its not over just when little England has finished it's vaccinations. We can argue all day over whether it's too cautious or not but I don't feel it was ever realistic for the scientists to back full lifting in June, and people having hope keeps the scenes like yesterday small. 

Now we have newspapers hinting at this sort of thing and the 1922 committee "warning" against extensions (surely they've heard whisperings? They're better connected than any journalist) it just feels like they're leaving the breadcrumbs again for what's coming.

All just very predictable. Probably the last time now though 

To a certain degree, but scientists and politicians also have to react to what is happening...so maybe christmas could have happened if a new more infectious variant hadn't started spreading throughout SE England etc. And now we'll have to see the state of things in the early summer on what sort of foreign travel is allowed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jparx said:

I'm still so baffled why everyone is banging on about foreign holidays. We all know exactly what the situation is, and it hasn't changed for a while. Book a package deal if you like and you're covered, book a holiday separately and you take the risk. Why do we have to keep asking every govt minister/opposition MP whether or not they would book a holiday? It's a very simple situation we're in right now...we just wait and see where we're at in a couple months. There is no answer right now.

Part of it is people wanting to see family who live abroad though. And a relaxing holiday is very important for peoples well being!

 

I do agree though that its a silly thing to ask right now. Maybe April 12th onwards!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jparx said:

I agree with the gist of what you're saying, but if we reach June and we've vaccinated most/all adults with 1 shot and a big chunk with both, hell even I'd be tempted to go down and protest if they looked to extend the restrictions (to be clear, I don't consider "masks and wash your hands" as restrictions). If they've been looking to buy time and keep the public onside by dangling carrots, I think they've potentially used that up now. 

I dont think people will be up for following restrictions onces theyve been jabbed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zahidf said:

Part of it is people wanting to see family who live abroad though. And a relaxing holiday is very important for peoples well being!

 

I do agree though that its a silly thing to ask right now. Maybe April 12th onwards!

I totally get it, but my point is I think the public are pretty clear on the situation, it's the media that keep banging on about it more than anything. Like, why is Andrew Marr asking Lisa Nandy if she'd book a holiday? Who gives a shit? We know we can't go anywhere right now, and I don't *think* people are clamouring for an answer on it - we know it's not on the cards until at least May.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Part of it is people wanting to see family who live abroad though. And a relaxing holiday is very important for peoples well being!

 

I do agree though that its a silly thing to ask right now. Maybe April 12th onwards!

I expect parts of Europe will be in a pretty bad way during April and probably into May...so maybe after that....!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zahidf said:

I dont think people will be up for following restrictions onces theyve been jabbed

I’ve been jabbed and have no issue with following restrictions... whilst it’s for the greater good ... and on balance at the moment for me and many others it still is ... of course some will have reassessed.... outside will be a good start to getting life back towards normal ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

You calling the kids in schools self harming and suffering mental health issues snowflakes ?  Classy

i Am sure you will get a few up votes though - seems to matter around here.

Nope, I don't use that term, hence the quote marks. Just pointing out your hypocrisy.

Oh, and are you seriously suggesting kids are self-harming because of masks? Nothing to do with isolation, boredom, fear, missing their friends, etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, jparx said:

I'm still so baffled why everyone is banging on about foreign holidays. We all know exactly what the situation is, and it hasn't changed for a while. Book a package deal if you like and you're covered, book a holiday separately and you take the risk. Why do we have to keep asking every govt minister/opposition MP whether or not they would book a holiday? It's a very simple situation we're in right now...we just wait and see where we're at in a couple months. There is no answer right now.

Agreed. It's pretty weird how much this being brought up. We've booked a package with a cancellation policy 60 days out. Why don't people just book things with cancellation policies or just wait and see how it pans out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

It’s worse this term than last term.  Masks have made it worse,

Or things are worse this term than last as this has been going on for longer now than then? 

Personally I think getting the schools open has been the top priority so reopening them at a point where mask wearing to mitigate spread was sensible but if we are in a position to ease other things then, removing masks in schools should be part of that.

Why are you so angry all the time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, jparx said:

I'm still so baffled why everyone is banging on about foreign holidays. We all know exactly what the situation is, and it hasn't changed for a while. Book a package deal if you like and you're covered, book a holiday separately and you take the risk.

 

1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

We've booked a package with a cancellation policy 60 days out. Why don't people just book things with cancellation policies or just wait and see how it pans out?

We've booked one way flights to Nice then on to Goa for November.

Fully refundable or transferable and also a couple of hotels in Goa with free cancellation.

Too good a price and hopefully all will be fine by then, if not then it's no loss anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Paul ™ said:

 

We've booked one way flights to Nice then on to Goa for November.

Fully refundable or transferable and also a couple of hotels in Goa with free cancellation.

Too good a price and hopefully all will be fine by then, if not then it's no loss anyway.

Yeah exactly, it's totally possible to book things with minimal risk if people want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The founder of the Mainz-based pharmaceutical company Biontech, Ugur Sahin, expects the lockdown policy to end in autumn. "In many countries in Europe and in the USA, we will probably be in the position at the end of the summer not to have to go into a lockdown", Sahin told the "Welt am Sonntag". “Of course there will continue to be local outbreaks, that will remain background noise. There will be mutations. But it is very unlikely that these will spread any fear, ”the entrepreneur expects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, jparx said:

I'm still so baffled why everyone is banging on about foreign holidays. We all know exactly what the situation is, and it hasn't changed for a while. Book a package deal if you like and you're covered, book a holiday separately and you take the risk. Why do we have to keep asking every govt minister/opposition MP whether or not they would book a holiday? It's a very simple situation we're in right now...we just wait and see where we're at in a couple months. There is no answer right now.

Yes and haven`t there been news no holidays or don`t book holidays yet a few weeks ago. Not much has changed - UK vaccination programme is going well, parts of Europe under the third wave of the Brit variant but also this will end come early summer. So I don`t say the point why the topic always comes up in the UK, because here it hasn't been one except the possibility with the EU green vaccination certificate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Paul ™ said:

 

We've booked one way flights to Nice then on to Goa for November.

Fully refundable or transferable and also a couple of hotels in Goa with free cancellation.

Too good a price and hopefully all will be fine by then, if not then it's no loss anyway.

Yep same here. We've booked to go to Japan for my 30th for the fall season this year. Leaning heavily towards "it won't happen", but it's fully refundable if we don't and we had a stonking deal on the flights and one of the hotels. Worth a punt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, jparx said:

I totally get it, but my point is I think the public are pretty clear on the situation, it's the media that keep banging on about it more than anything. Like, why is Andrew Marr asking Lisa Nandy if she'd book a holiday? Who gives a shit? We know we can't go anywhere right now, and I don't *think* people are clamouring for an answer on it - we know it's not on the cards until at least May.

Because if he can get someone like Lisa Nandy to say she wouldn't book a foreign holiday now then it becomes a thing.  Then they get some representative of the travel industry - probably that gobshite from Ryanair - to come on and get all angry.  Then Simon Calder will come on, stood outside an airport or something, to earn his appearance fee.  Then the PM on Wednesday will throw it back at Starmer saying Labour want to cancel summer and claim his government is doing all it can to support the tourism industry.

And that's how content is made!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, fatyeti24 said:

Because if he can get someone like Lisa Nandy to say she wouldn't book a foreign holiday now then it becomes a thing.  Then they get some representative of the travel industry - probably that gobshite from Ryanair - to come on and get all angry.  Then Simon Calder will come on, stood outside an airport or something, to earn his appearance fee.  Then the PM on Wednesday will throw it back at Starmer saying Labour want to cancel summer and claim his government is doing all it can to support the tourism industry.

And that's how content is made!

yes, and probably no competitor in this years Mallorca beach chair battle for the Germans. would be very sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...