Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Ozanne said:

In one of the previous press conferences they said that for the next 2 weeks cases will rise and not to worry about that. We’ll see after that if there’s any issues with hospitalisations. 

Very much this, at this point, the doubt still hadn’t kicked in for me, I was still going to Glastonbury.. was just back from the stereophonics gig in Nottingham that weekend, the lineup was brill and gave me some hope for a while

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Andre91 said:

If everyone having the first vaccine by early June comes to pass, I really hope they keep the 21st as the ‘end’ date and spend those extra couple of weeks getting the second dose in as many people as is humanly possible. 
 

We’re gonna be fine, aren’t we. Happy freakin’ days. 

If the UK approves the Johnson and Johnson vaccine its going to go much faster. You need to hope for that to get to June 21. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2021 at 12:22 PM, gizmoman said:

Will this "freedom" mean the return of peaceful protest? Of course not, such gatherings will be classed as risky because the people attending won't have been tested or checked for vaccination. Since the majority have now been propagandised into accepting this new level of control it will be easy to demonise and shut down any protest, whatever the cause. The public simply won't care if the Police use unlawful means to break up demos, look at the response on here to the anti-lockdown demos last year. Even if you disagree with the cause, the right to peaceful protest is a basic freedom, people are starting to forget what rights they had and are willing to surrender anything just to get to the pub.

I was going to take a break for a bit but this is important.

Only 2 weeks since I posted that and we see this,

https://www.politics.co.uk/comment/2021/03/11/silencing-black-lives-matter-priti-patels-anti-protest-law/

(From the politics thread)

This is nothing to do with BLM it's a way to silence ANY dissent, they are bringing it in now because people cannot protest against it due to the anti-democracy lockdown laws, this is another step towards totalitarianism, brought in while people are in a positive frame of mind due to the "hope" that things are going to get better. the more we tolerate this increasing erosion of liberty the worse it's going to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andre91 said:

If everyone having the first vaccine by early June comes to pass, I really hope they keep the 21st as the ‘end’ date and spend those extra couple of weeks getting the second dose in as many people as is humanly possible. 
 

We’re gonna be fine, aren’t we. Happy freakin’ days. 

The thinking will be the vulnerable will have rhe 2 doses by then and it'd be 3 weeks after the first dose kicks in for first dose 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, gizmoman said:

I was going to take a break for a bit but this is important.

Only 2 weeks since I posted that and we see this,

https://www.politics.co.uk/comment/2021/03/11/silencing-black-lives-matter-priti-patels-anti-protest-law/

(From the politics thread)

This is nothing to do with BLM it's a way to silence ANY dissent, they are bringing it in now because people cannot protest against it due to the anti-democracy lockdown laws, this is another step towards totalitarianism, brought in while people are in a positive frame of mind due to the "hope" that things are going to get better. the more we tolerate this increasing erosion of liberty the worse it's going to get.

"That X-thing was dreadful" 

Hypocrite 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, gizmoman said:

I was going to take a break for a bit but this is important.

Only 2 weeks since I posted that and we see this,

https://www.politics.co.uk/comment/2021/03/11/silencing-black-lives-matter-priti-patels-anti-protest-law/

(From the politics thread)

This is nothing to do with BLM it's a way to silence ANY dissent, they are bringing it in now because people cannot protest against it due to the anti-democracy lockdown laws, this is another step towards totalitarianism, brought in while people are in a positive frame of mind due to the "hope" that things are going to get better. the more we tolerate this increasing erosion of liberty the worse it's going to get.

Whilst I agree that giving the police more powers to deal with protests is a bad thing it has the square root of fuck all to do with lockdown. The reason most people aren't up in arms about this is they don't like Extinction Rebellion making them late for work and they think BLM want to take down statues of Winston Churchill it isn't because there is a pandemic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, gizmoman said:

I was going to take a break for a bit but this is important.

Only 2 weeks since I posted that and we see this,

https://www.politics.co.uk/comment/2021/03/11/silencing-black-lives-matter-priti-patels-anti-protest-law/

(From the politics thread)

This is nothing to do with BLM it's a way to silence ANY dissent, they are bringing it in now because people cannot protest against it due to the anti-democracy lockdown laws, this is another step towards totalitarianism, brought in while people are in a positive frame of mind due to the "hope" that things are going to get better. the more we tolerate this increasing erosion of liberty the worse it's going to get.

It’s absolutely horrifying stuff, while simultaneously being utterly predictable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, JoeyT said:

I think he's a bit of a nutter.

What's the general consensus of him in Wales? 

It’s a tricky one. During the first lockdown and any time since (including the firebreak we had in December) I’ve been fairly supportive of his decisions.

This time around it’s fairly difficult to do so as there doesn’t seem to be any form of logic behind his decisions. He stopped supermarkets selling non-essential items to make it fair on non-essential retail which was closed. But that’s now changed, supermarkets CAN sell non-essential items again but the “normal” shops aren’t allowed to open. This is one of many things that don’t make much sense and are slowly losing the public.

The main issue that seems to be arising is that he seems to have this fixation with doing things differently to England. In our rules they even made a point of saying to some of the things “THIS IS BEFORE ENGLAND”. 
I might be fairly biased with this one as it involves my job but he seems to have a complete disregarded for hospitality too. He’s said he won’t even consider opening hospitality outdoors until the start of May, which means people will likely just head to England and visit their pubs, restaurants etc.

TL;DR I think he’s had the support of the Welsh public through a lot of this but is starting to lose them, he needs to be careful.

Edited by DareToDibble
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Not sure how sorry you should be. You raised a valuable issue. 

Lockdowns are enforced.  Isolation can be voluntary.  I think there is key difference.

If you have anxiety from lockdown it's being enforced on you. 

If you have anxiety from getting back out there you have the choice to do less.

I get your point, though it's not quite that simple- for some the anxiety will likely be triggered by the world getting back out there even if they stay in (outside will seem more threatening), plus it's not all up to choice, there will be pressure for individuals to 'get back out there' even if they don't feel ready to (eg work may insist on ending home working, their kids will have to go to school, they may have to go back to uni, there will be social pressure from friends and family, plus the government may introduce financial pressures to try and push people back into doing what they ant them to do).

Probably the best way forwards with regards to those anxious about lockdown ending would be to open up things gradually (like is planned), and allow people to re-enter society at their own pace (doing more as they feel safer), but I don't think the latter will end up being as much of a choice as it should be (remember after the first lockdown those pathetic newspaper campaigns saying it was time for people to get back to work etc etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

I get your point, though it's not quite that simple- for some the anxiety will likely be triggered by the world getting back out there even if they stay in (outside will seem more threatening), plus it's not all up to choice, there will be pressure for individuals to 'get back out there' even if they don't feel ready to (eg work may insist on ending home working, their kids will have to go to school, they may have to go back to uni, there will be social pressure from friends and family, plus the government may introduce financial pressures to try and push people back into doing what they ant them to do).

Probably the best way forwards with regards to those anxious about lockdown ending would be to open up things gradually (like is planned), and allow people to re-enter society at their own pace (doing more as they feel safer), but I don't think the latter will end up being as much of a choice as it should be (remember after the first lockdown those pathetic newspaper campaigns saying it was time for people to get back to work etc etc).

There are probably quite a few people whose anxiety isn't actually related to covid too. People who were already anxious in their work environment, or on public transport or whatever have been able to avoid that while furloughed or working from home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Simsy said:

There are probably quite a few people whose anxiety isn't actually related to covid too. People who were already anxious in their work environment, or on public transport or whatever have been able to avoid that while furloughed or working from home.

Absolutely!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Simsy said:

There are probably quite a few people whose anxiety isn't actually related to covid too. People who were already anxious in their work environment, or on public transport or whatever have been able to avoid that while furloughed or working from home.

Fuck yes. I really don’t want to go back into the office and WFH has been such a great move for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Fuck yes. I really don’t want to go back into the office and WFH has been such a great move for me. 

I can imagine- I'm fortunate to not have to work in an office, but I do think the thought of going back to working in an office full time with long train commutes etc must seem like a horrible prospect for a lot of people who have got to experience life without all that wasted time travelling. Commuting to work was really getting to me before all the covid stuff took off- just hours and hours of wasted time, stress, money, cancelled and delayed overpacked trains, worry about being late, not able to get home- it feels like another lifetime ago!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...