Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, st dan said:

Obviously with a degree of hindsight, but the decision to allow household mixing over Christmas could go down as one of the most monumental government fuck ups of our time (although there are many to choose from!!)

Governmental fuck ups aren't really seen as an issue these days are they? If anything, people seem to love them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, st dan said:

Obviously with a degree of hindsight, but the decision to allow household mixing over Christmas could go down as one of the most monumental government fuck ups of our time (although there are many to choose from!!)

Exactly. We should never forget this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

I know from a friend of mine who is a nurse there that our local hospital in Bath had over 200 staff off for COVID related reasons last week...

Wow that’s crazy numbers. And with the hospitals approaching capacity and less and less staff able to treat them, we are in for an awful mess across the country for the coming weeks/months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, st dan said:

Obviously with a degree of hindsight, but the decision to allow household mixing over Christmas could go down as one of the most monumental government fuck ups of our time (although there are many to choose from!!)

I don't see that hindsight is needed here.

Don't let them off lightly. They could and should have seen it coming, as many experts were warning loudly about it all along. Before anyone was saying the words "new variant" as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, st dan said:

Wow that’s crazy numbers. And with the hospitals approaching capacity and less and less staff able to treat them, we are in for an awful mess across the country for the coming weeks/months. 

And still depending on these.......whole boxful ready to go!

 

IMG_20201230_164734.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

I know from a friend of mine who is a nurse there that our local hospital in Bath had over 200 staff off for COVID related reasons last week...

I do think that frontline care workers and carers in care homes should be at the front of the vaccine queue, ahead of the care home residents themselves,  and the vulnerable and the elderly. If we dont have the care workers and front line NHS workers available to help/treat then the impact on the rest of the population, including the elderly and vulnerable will be significantly worse, as your comment indicates. The best thing a care home resident can have is knowing their carers dont have the virus, if the carers don't have it then its unlikely they will get it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dingbat2 said:

I do think that frontline care workers and carers in care homes should be at the front of the vaccine queue, ahead of the care home residents themselves,  and the vulnerable and the elderly. If we dont have the care workers and front line NHS workers available to help/treat then the impact on the rest of the population, including the elderly and vulnerable will be significantly worse, as your comment indicates. The best thing a care home resident can have is knowing their carers dont have the virus, if the carers don't have it then its unlikely they will get it

Completely agree and teachers shouldn’t be far behind.

Crazy to not vaccinate them ASAP in mine and I’m sure most people’s opinions!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Homer said:

Surprised to hear that Moeen Ali has tested positive for coronavirus as he hasn't had a bat for ages.

(If you're not a cricket fan, I can assure you that joke was absolutely hilarious.)

its also the first thing he's caught in a while

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dingbat2 said:

I do think that frontline care workers and carers in care homes should be at the front of the vaccine queue, ahead of the care home residents themselves,  and the vulnerable and the elderly. If we dont have the care workers and front line NHS workers available to help/treat then the impact on the rest of the population, including the elderly and vulnerable will be significantly worse, as your comment indicates. The best thing a care home resident can have is knowing their carers dont have the virus, if the carers don't have it then its unlikely they will get it

yes, agreed 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Homer said:

I know Trump is a massive fan of some stupid positive thinking guru bullshit, where he believes that if he ignores a problem it doesn't exist - which doesn't really seem to be compatible with a pandemic.

 

Is there a chance Johnson is slightly inclined in the same way? He does always seem to be overly chirpy and in denial about the whole mass death situation.

I think he's just so used to things working out for him in the past with minimal effort on his part, that he just can't comprehend it when things don't. Hence, the denial

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

 

100k seems optimistic to me - we're at around 1k deaths a day at the moment which you'd think will likely last at least another 20 days or so and then it'll tail off. Morbid but if I had to guess I'd say 150k when all said and done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, topmarksbri said:

100k seems optimistic to me - we're at around 1k deaths a day at the moment which you'd think will likely last at least another 20 days or so and then it'll tail off. Morbid but if I had to guess I'd say 150k when all said and done. 

Shit, are we at 1,000 a day now? I blissfully checked out of the news cycle for a lot of Xmas. It was lovely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Homer said:

Shit, are we at 1,000 a day now? I blissfully checked out of the news cycle for a lot of Xmas. It was lovely.

we were nearly at 1000 for a few days, then dropped a bit over weekend...but numbers all a bit over the shop probably because of way recorded over holiday period. Whatever it actually is, things are obviously very, very bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

Scotland has more vulnerable people per capita than the rest of the UK I’m sure. All that buckfast and deep fried Mars bars catch up to you. 

I can’t find it now but I actually think that’s true. I also don’t think NHS capacity is particularly great either, which is why Sturgeon has jumped today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...