Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ROBO2017 said:

They will surely headline sooner rather than later... I know they pulled out from headlining in the 90's so bridges might be burnt between RHCP and the Eavis family - but what a great fucking headliner they'd be. 

I'm a bit torn because they are one of if not my all time favourite bands. But there is a big caveat and that is with John being in the band! No John and the magic just seems to be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Used to absolutely love RHCP, saw them a couple of times in 2011, just missed the boat on Frusciante which is a shame, but they put on a couple of decent shows (for a fan at least)! Knebworth especially was great, don't know if they'd be any good now but there are certainly better alternatives, they undoubtably could fill a setlist with familiar hits though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass said:

Why do people cry when I have a pop at bands they like?

I don't like RHCP at all just find it bizarre that it would evoke such strong reactions from someone. Literally saw you doing it yesterday on the Other Stage thread and then saying you don't do it.

Can't wait for The Killers to play n you to be livid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, didinowanttohearthat said:

I don't like RHCP at all just find it bizarre that it would evoke such strong reactions from someone. Literally saw you doing it yesterday on the Other Stage thread and then saying you don't do it.

Can't wait for The Killers to play n you to be livid.

From yesterday...

15 hours ago, Hugh Jass said:

No no. Definitely interested in seeing The Cure and I’ve said a few times that I’m perfectly happy to see The Killers if nothing else takes my fancy.

Yes I have a pop at a few (and it's always the same four or five), but then who doesn't on here? It would be pretty boring if everyone either liked the same things or just said "well they're not for me but I respect them as musicians" or some such lame shite. Why are people so precious about it? Part of the fun of this forum, and being a music fan in general, is slagging off the stuff you don't like. Do you think I'd genuinely prefer to see Di's funeral up there or was I just exaggerating for comic effect? Do you see me crying when someone has a dig at something I like?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

From yesterday...

Yes I have a pop at a few (and it's always the same four or five), but then who doesn't on here? It would be pretty boring if everyone either liked the same things or just said "well they're not for me but I respect them as musicians" or some such lame shite. Why are people so precious about it? Part of the fun of this forum, and being a music fan in general, is slagging off the stuff you don't like. Do you think I'd genuinely prefer to see Di's funeral up there or was I just exaggerating for comic effect? Do you see me crying when someone has a dig at something I like?

It's weird isn't it? There's a couple of people who get super upset about RHCP specifically I've noticed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Yes I have a pop at a few (and it's always the same four or five), but then who doesn't on here? It would be pretty boring if everyone either liked the same things or just said "well they're not for me but I respect them as musicians" or some such lame shite. Why are people so precious about it? Part of the fun of this forum, and being a music fan in general, is slagging off the stuff you don't like. Do you think I'd genuinely prefer to see Di's funeral up there or was I just exaggerating for comic effect? Do you see me crying when someone has a dig at something I like?

Totally agree it would be boring if everyone liked the same thing that's exactly my point, imagine you'd just joined this site n wanted to know if Courtneers or Catfish or whoever you liked where possibly playing this year. Can tell you for sure the person would be shot down immediately. Contrast that to if Radiohead ar mentioned it'll turn into a 10 page discussion on how great they are.

It's off-putting for newer/lurking users. And no, before you say it again, im not crying about it just making a point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, didinowanttohearthat said:

Totally agree it would be boring if everyone liked the same thing that's exactly my point, imagine you'd just joined this site n wanted to know if Courtneers or Catfish or whoever you liked where possibly playing this year. Can tell you for sure the person would be shot down immediately. Contrast that to if Radiohead ar mentioned it'll turn into a 10 page discussion on how great they are.

It's off-putting for newer/lurking users. And no, before you say it again, im not crying about it just making a point.

Fecking Radiohead....! There back catalogue is the musical equivalent of Princess Di's funeral..

but yes, you are correct, there is far too much unnecessary slagging off of bands on here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...