Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

The it's a shame their stature had dies a bit as ideally their set would have closed with a few more songs over Ed....his set could have been a sub set easily.

I love Biblical myself but the biggest crowd reactions I'd say are Golden Role and Bubbles.

You are correct, hold my hands up and I will do so again with VW but I can't see it. I wouldn't rule out Other headliner but I'd see them as Other sub or 3rd Pyramid.

But then Stormzy, Liam and Gaga for me will sub so I can't see them there anyway. 

Just can’t see Gaga subbing.  Still actually can’t see The 1975 headlining this time either.  Reckon they could quite easily fit in a JP set like The Killers did.

Gaga, Stormzy

The Cure, LDR/Vampire Weekend

Macca, Liam

Also think that the likes of George Ezra, Dua Lipa and Rita Ora will all get high spots Too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sisco said:

Just can’t see Gaga subbing.  Still actually can’t see The 1975 headlining this time either.  Reckon they could quite easily fit in a JP set like The Killers did.

Gaga, Stormzy

The Cure, LDR/Vampire Weekend

Macca, Liam

Also think that the likes of George Ezra, Dua Lipa and Rita Ora will all get high spots Too

That's where we are different though which is no bad thing. I'm the same vein I don't see Gaga being given headline at all, LDR is a 3rd down for me even with the rarity. Rita Ora won't be as high as either of them two imo unlesa she subs Other but 4th down or 3rd Other for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read the eFests article on Glasto headliners and I see it says that Macca is playing on Wednesday in the US so is likely to be doing the Sunday at Glasto, and I still see quite a few people on here saying he'll likely be on the Sunday. If he flies straight home from the US after that show he'll be back by Thursday night. The Cure have a show in Belgium on the Friday night. Surely Macca on the Saturday and The Cure Sunday makes more sense? Why does he need more than two whole days rest before stepping on stage again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gucci Piggy said:

Just read the eFests article on Glasto headliners and I see it says that Macca is playing on Wednesday in the US so is likely to be doing the Sunday at Glasto, and I still see quite a few people on here saying he'll likely be on the Sunday. If he flies straight home from the US after that show he'll be back by Thursday night. The Cure have a show in Belgium on the Friday night. Surely Macca on the Saturday and The Cure Sunday makes more sense? Why does he need more than two whole days rest before stepping on stage again?

Because he's 76? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sisco said:

Just can’t see Gaga subbing.  

It's nonsense. She's a huge star (irrespective of how many copies her last album may, or may not have sold - don't know why some people get so hung up on this) and I'm sure they'd snap her up to headline if available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was just reading about Blake’s comment about being at wedding across the glasto comment on the arctic monkeys us tumblr, unless it was a private conversation with the poster on here saying he’s not missing much being at the wedding on his tumblr he said he selfishly doesn’t want them there? Not necessarily  ruled out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jparx said:

Because he's 76? ?

Yeah but he's doing shows on consecutive nights on his tour (in the same city) and shows two days apart (in different cities). I don't really see why having to take a long flight back from the US means he needs three times as many days to recover once he's home. If he plays Wednesday then Saturday he's still got just under 3 days to rest his voice between shows. Like someone (I think dental) said before, he is resting his voice whilst flying back, it's not like he spends the flight home singing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Supreme2 said:

Was just reading about Blake’s comment about being at wedding across the glasto comment on the arctic monkeys us tumblr, unless it was a private conversation with the poster on here saying he’s not missing much being at the wedding on his tumblr he said he selfishly doesn’t want them there? Not necessarily  ruled out?

Yeah the guy on here who posted it messaged him privately. It wasn't something he posted publicly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, henry bear said:

It's nonsense. She's a huge star (irrespective of how many copies her last album may, or may not have sold - don't know why some people get so hung up on this) and I'm sure they'd snap her up to headline if available. 

And.... she’s female! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MetaKate said:

I dont think I know one song by the 1975, I've heard them mentioned on here obviously. I think maybe they havent done much internationally (I'm in canada) or I've just missed them somehow. 

It's also easy enough to live in the UK and have never heard a song by them.

But.....they seem to shift the right amount of tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

It's also easy enough to live in the UK and have never heard a song by them.

But.....they seem to shift the right amount of tickets.

I just listened to "chocolate" 

Is this real?

I get that they might have a following.... but they surely cant be headlining? Do they put on a show or something? 

I dont get it, but hopefully Robyn will be headlining any stage at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MetaKate said:

 

I just listened to "chocolate" 

Is this real?

I get that they might have a following.... but they surely cant be headlining? Do they put on a show or something? 

I dont get it, but hopefully Robyn will be headlining any stage at the same time.

I'm from the UK and yeah unfortanetly its real. They are really quite terrible I don't get the appeal at all. Never a met a person that was into them and Im not that old.

Edited by Xeph1995
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mumfords standing tickets are £65.... really!? And what in the name of fuck is a "gentlemen of the road" ticket and which stupid twat pays £140 for it. 

Sometimes I'm quite glad music like this bypasses me even if it does make me feel old as fuck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doug85 said:

Mumfords standing tickets are £65.... really!? And what in the name of fuck is a "gentlemen of the road" ticket and which stupid twat pays £140 for it. 

Sometimes I'm quite glad music like this bypasses me even if it does make me feel old as fuck. 

Giorgio Moroder ones are the best part of £80. I really want to see him but that is an absolute killer at the minute with all other stuff I have on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MetaKate said:

 

I just listened to "chocolate" 

Is this real?

I get that they might have a following.... but they surely cant be headlining? Do they put on a show or something? 

I dont get it, but hopefully Robyn will be headlining any stage at the same time.

One of the most grating pop songs I've heard in recent years. Woeful. Luckily since then they've made a lot better tracks. I'd be amazed and a little disappointed if they are to headline. It would highlight how weak the industry is for me, personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...