Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

Yes.....don't take my word for the them....check stats...that don't lie!

Joanne sold less and considerably enough so that the bombed Artpop....even in America! Compared them to earlier and it's crazy! 

To put a little context into it...that awful M&S output of Wilder Wind only got beat by 10k coppies with Gaga's Joanne. And that was the album for them that people said are they relevant....didn't even know they released an album. Now I knew about Joanne ....but mostly due to the bold art on the album case but it very much came and went to a point Artpop was talked about for longer...not for good reasons but no publicly is bad publicity and all that.

What about a side on headshot if the lead artist counts as bold album art?

And it's not really a suprise that a big electro-pop acts country and jazz albums did more poorly than their normal stuff is it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StupidDream said:

Haha, great daughter you have, especially as I am a huge Beatles fan myself. Started around age of 14 and more than a decade later I still am. My old man is a fan too, but doesn't know as much as I do and I often have to 'educate' him :P Had few young friends to share it with, sadly. 

What triggered their sudden interest in them? 

I'm not sure to be honest. At Glasto 2017 we went to the bootleg Beatles and kids sat in the doorway reading the Glastonbury press, so it's turned around pretty quickly! Maybe she received subliminal messages...did they play any tracks backwards I wonder?:mellow:.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In June I was talking to this guy who was a production manager for the Carters then current stadium tour. He was saying he also looks after the Foos and Gaga, and what a talent the latter is. She did the album with Tony Bennett because she’s a huge fan and it was a thrill for her. I don’t think album sales was a consideration - it was always going to be playing to more of a niche market. ASIB will more than make up for that, and shows an ambition, like those last few albums, to stretch herself creatively, rather than just churning out pop albums. I don’t think she’ll be at GF, but I hope so (even though I’m not a huge fan myself, just think it would be a great booking), and if she is I really can’t see her anything other than headlining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@slash's hat I asked my 15 year old about the 1975 as well and he didnt have a clue. Him and his mates mostly listen to whatever we are calling grime/drill/etc now plus a lot of US Drake type stuff, I had a look at his playlist and hadnt heard of any of them. He does know who Bastille and Kasabian are though as I have been dragged to see them before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, henry bear said:

I know they’re big with the yoof, and sell out arenas and stuff, but honestly don’t think they’ve got enough appeal outside of that age bracket to make them classic headliner material yet.

Yep people on here are saying they'd get a massive crowd but I don't think they would. They're huge but I'd guess that most of their fanbase aren't Glasto attendees. I think they'd be pretty poorly received as a headliner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Gucci Piggy said:

The 1975 are one of those bands you get laughed at for listening to. They're like the pop version of My Chemical Romance.

I don't hate them, but if I was listening to The 1975 at uni and someone asked who I was listening to I'd probably say someone else.

Totally different experience to mine, although everyone I know who likes them also listens to Ed Sheeran and that so I’m probably just not very cool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Gucci Piggy said:

The 1975 are one of those bands you get laughed at for listening to. They're like the pop version of My Chemical Romance.

I don't hate them, but if I was listening to The 1975 at uni and someone asked who I was listening to I'd probably say someone else.

*Somebody Else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, henry bear said:

I know they’re big with the yoof, and sell out arenas and stuff, but honestly don’t think they’ve got enough appeal outside of that age bracket to make them classic headliner material yet.

the crowds that packed out various tents for them at R+L in 2013, 2014 and 2016 should in theory now have ‘graduated’ to going to Glastonbury. And according to reports on here they got a bigger crowd on the Other Stage in 2016 than basically anyone else including the headliners anyway. Obviously it doesn’t necessarily work like that and some of them may have moved on to shite like drill but they’d definitely get a respectable crowd. 

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stokesy10 said:

I've been meaning to ask summat about his performance which didn't warrant a new thread:

I watched one of those "vids to show newbies" the other day, and there was some clips of Sheeran, snippets of about 8 tracks - Was it LITERALLY him and the acoustic for the entire set? The odd bit of percussion? It sounded like the most boring sack of cack ever. I know a video on a mobile isn't a great example of what a gig sounds like.

Mostly. Some tracks he adds layers with a loop pedal, he used a different instrument on Shape Of You, and for one Irish sounding song he had an Irish band with him. But it's mostly him and his guitar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mattymooz said:

What about a side on headshot if the lead artist counts as bold album art?

And it's not really a suprise that a big electro-pop acts country and jazz albums did more poorly than their normal stuff is it...

No.....but I don't think that really helps make it a different story.

Regardless of the material release...if it bombs and unnoticed then it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the 1975 at Lolapolooza in Berlin a few years ago. They were nowhere as boring as Radiohead, who I had to escape as far away as possible from.

Never thought they would end up Glastonbury headliners though, from their performance in Berlin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the 1975 at Lolapolooza in Berlin a few years ago. They were nowhere as boring as Radiohead, who I had to escape as far away as possible from.

Never thought they would end up Glastonbury headliners though, from their performance in Berlin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...