Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, StupidDream said:

My bad, the word 'fan' was missing with website. But it still holds with all the touring and release dates he had correct earlier this year. And indeed, wasn't too sure about them headlining GF again.

Oh I'm defo not saying you're wrong and tbh Arctics doing Friday for a 3rd time wasn't sitting properly with me.

If they are in for 2020 then they'll need a new album as no new tour dates into 2019 yet although they can have a break over the Xmas period. If they have a new album to tour randomly then I'd agree 2020 but this one only came out May this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when the BBC announced Green Day and Ed Sheeran then retracted the claims saying it wasn't based on anything. What if A. They were actually booked for 2019 or B. They pulled out. Its the 25th anniversary of Dookie and Tre Cool released a hint they will be touring it. They fit somebody whom hasn't headlined before and would be someone who people have hardly discussed. I thought it wouldn't happen but there is as much chance a some of the others we have discussed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RarerThanDandyB said:

Remember when the BBC announced Green Day and Ed Sheeran then retracted the claims saying it wasn't based on anything. What if A. They were actually booked for 2019 or B. They pulled out. Its the 25th anniversary of Dookie and Tre Cool released a hint they will be touring it. They fit somebody whom hasn't headlined before and would be someone who people have hardly discussed. I thought it wouldn't happen but there is as much chance a some of the others we have discussed. 

You are over-thinking it.

It was just a staff desk writer who thought it was fact when it was rumour. They didn't announce it, it was just written at the start of an article on Glasto.

Edited by briddj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, RarerThanDandyB said:

I think Macca and Cure are definite but the final one will be a surprise and somebody we haven't even contemplated.

Agreed.

I guess that one will be the last announcement too. I don’t think it will be a male act either. 

If Swift and Gaga are being talked about then Ariane Grande is a possible?

Edited by kevbizarre
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kevbizarre said:

Agreed.

I guess that one will be the last announcement too. I don’t think it will be a male act either. 

If Swift and Gaga are being talked about then Ariane Grande is a possible?

I can assure you that word font will not be headlining Glastonbury 2019?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an odd one with AM, I'd convinced myself they were 1 of the 2 who have requested to headline 2020 but that's a long way off from now and the new album will have been toured to death by then.

I guess they could drop a new tune or 2 in the lead up to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mufcok said:

It's an odd one with AM, I'd convinced myself they were 1 of the 2 who have requested to headline 2020 but that's a long way off from now and the new album will have been toured to death by then.

I guess they could drop a new tune or 2 in the lead up to it

If they’re cutting the tour early, I would think it’s to work on a new album. They’re rumoured to be releasing a new album next year even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ghostdancer1 said:

it's this. Request someone vaguely credible and they'll have short enough odds. Whether the bookies decide to actually put them on the website is another matter, but bookies are about parting punters from their cash, so if they're added, then it's because SkyBet or whoever think there's profit to be made.

Odds don't reflect liklihood. there's been plenty of odds in the past years for acts that are playing Thurs+Friday+Sunday+Monday in the US, or whatever...

Agree they are still quoting Fleetwood Mac as 1/2 even though ruled out and stormzy same to protect themselves just in case .

1975 come right in obviously based on rumours and people lumping on them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, StupidDream said:

If Gaga is considered, would Justin Timberlake be a weird shout? 

(Almost didn't dare to ask the question...)

I thought it was nailed on to happen at some point - he’s brilliant live and would’ve won over a lot of people - until his latest album was mostly beyond embarrassing and deservedly bombed. I’d love it but he had to pull half of his most recent UK tour due to abysmal ticket sales earlier this year, so I’m not so sure his moment hasn’t passed now.

He’s in the ‘would pull a hefty crowd but should’ve been booked five years ago if it was ever going to happen’ boat along with Rihanna and, until ASIB came out, Gaga. Although they booked Kanye when he was firmly within that category so idk if it’s something that would prevent them from booking JT if the opportunity arose.

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

I thought it was nailed on to happen at some point until his latest album was mostly shocking and deservedly bombed. I’d love it but he had to pull half of his most recent UK tour due to abysmal ticket sales earlier this year, so I’m not so sure his moment hasn’t passed now. He’s pretty much in the same boat as Rihanna except she’s renowned for being terrible live.

Don't reckon Rihanna's moment has passed. Timberlake's probably hasn't either, really, but he's never really entered the conversation for Glastonbury headliners even when touring so don't really have anything to measure his current appeal against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Don't reckon Rihanna's moment has passed. Timberlake's probably hasn't either, really, but he's never really entered the conversation for Glastonbury headliners even when touring so don't really have anything to measure his current appeal against.

Sorry, I edited my post :(  When I got the notification you’d quoted me I thought it was you popping up to put me right on Kanye being booked five years too late :lol: 

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Sorry, I edited my post :( 

Great. Now I have to read a whole nother post!

But yeah I'm not sure what it would be like if Justin Timberlake headlined. With Lady Gaga and Rihanna - even if they've slipped - they've both been huge in not-so-distant memory and are recent cultural icons who are one degree away from what's massive right now. Justin Timberlake still has huge hits but he hasn't seemed current for at least ten years, and I don't really know what demographic he pulls in and whether those folk would be at Glastonbury. Would bet his Coachella set will go down poorly.

Edited by dentalplan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...