Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Lennon, McCartney and Harrison each had ten times the songwriting chops of Gary Barlow, and The Beatles had all three of them! The marketing of TT can be compared to the early days of The Beatles on a basic and very simplified level but the latter grew into something far more credible and interesting than Take That could ever be. There’s no comparison worth talking about, before you even get onto the legacy The Beatles left behind which continues to influence music 50 years later.

Sorry if this sounds like mansplaining btw.

Yes, I recall the frog chorus as a highlight of Paul's career :D (ok I do own that single - I was young). So it took 3 brilliant songwriters to achieve their success in comparison to only 1 main songwriter for Take That's success. Sorry just being pedantic there.

Who knows what influences will be in music 50 years from now, I wont be around to say wether he will. But Adele has said Spice Girls were an influence on her, so it's not impossible.

30 minutes ago, henry bear said:

They were a raw rock & roll band who played for a few years before the hits started. Yes, all the Beatlemania may give the impression they were a pop act for girls to scream at, but at heart they were always rockers. 

Maybe because I was brought up listening to my dad's Elvis and Little Richard records my idea of rock'n'roll is different then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, morph100 said:

McCartney 

Cure

Arctic Monkeys

is this what we think now? What percetange of certainty would we put on each?

I'd go 80% on all, even with Arctics. They are an easy booking for the festival and given their tour dates and the fact they'll probably do an outdoor tour next year the money will be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, morph100 said:

McCartney 

Cure

Arctic Monkeys

is this what we think now? What percetange of certainty would we put on each?

Seems to be ‘good info’ on all three. I’m not convinced though - would be the first time there’s never been a new Pyramid headliner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, henry bear said:

Seems to be ‘good info’ on all three. I’m not convinced though - would be the first time there’s never been a new Pyramid headliner. 

Genuinely don't think that's that big of a deal. There's an entire generation come to adulthood since The Cure last did it. And Macca's not far behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, henry bear said:

Seems to be ‘good info’ on all three. I’m not convinced though - would be the first time there’s never been a new Pyramid headliner. 

Possibly not diverse enough as well? The old white males with guitars argument...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Florence and the machine

Artic monkeys

Kasabian

Other stage 

Nerd

Disclourse 

Stormzy

Other acts

The courteeners

Bring me the horizon

Bastille

Liam gallger

Panic at the disco

Kasier chiefs

Catfish and the bottlemen 

Kings of leon secret set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, henry bear said:

Seems to be ‘good info’ on all three. I’m not convinced though - would be the first time there’s never been a new Pyramid headliner. 

Which was probably going to happen at some point. Say FATM did it...it would still technically be a returning headliner...plus it would be argued 4 years isn't long enough. The 1975 would be the only option around atm probably but if they've been offered headline and not at Glastonbury theb you have to say those slots these days while at your peak. I don't think there is enough in them maybe to headline Glastonbury then R&L the 2nd year plus their big tour....a secert slot perhaps.

At least it's not two returning from the same year as headliners. 

Edited by thewayiam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...