Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Next Announcement 2017 Thread


Gnomicide

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Fladog said:

Thanks, im just waiting nervously for the Radiohead masses to attack me for trying to start such a rumour

Radiohead fans are too busy putting the world to rights in their own thread, to bother with mere mortals elsewhere.

As Morrisey would say "World peace is none of your business"

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

I agree with pretty much all you've written, but if two or three  bands are touring that I want to see, and I can only afford one gig. Then the one I'd pick wouldn't be one I knew was playing a festival I was going to. 

I hedged my bets and bought a Bon Iver ticket as I couldn't afford that and The XX. 

Was going to "save" The XX for Glastonbury. At least 50% of my plan didn't work very well! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, eastynh said:

Is there only me who goes there for the music? I won't lie, most of the other stuff does not interest me in the slightest. Don't get me wrong, Arcadia impressed me the 1st time I seen it. Yet nothing I have seen at Glastonbury has ever had a lasting effect on me.

Now people will laugh here but I found Jodrell bank a far more inspiring place than Glastonbury. The place just blows me away. I came away from there and wanted to study physics. Unfortunately I could not get on any degree course as I had no GCSE's.

If the line up at Glastobury was really bobbins, it would not bother me in the slightest putting my tickets back in the pot.

I totally get what you're saying but I'm the exact opposite. It's the only festival I'll lay down money on without caring who is playing. There's not been a Glastonbury I've been to when I've been totally blown away by the lineup, and the acts I want to headline the Pyramid probably never will (Depeche Mode/Stone Roses) but I still keep coming. Must be something in that milk...

You're not alone though. My good friend stopped going after 2009 because he no longer liked the lineups. He's not been since.

Jodrell Bank is an incredible site. Never been there for a music event but I imagine it's pretty special

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, eastynh said:

Is there only me who goes there for the music? I won't lie, most of the other stuff does not interest me in the slightest. Don't get me wrong, Arcadia impressed me the 1st time I seen it. Yet nothing I have seen at Glastonbury has ever had a lasting effect on me.

Now people will laugh here but I found Jodrell bank a far more inspiring place than Glastonbury. The place just blows me away. I came away from there and wanted to study physics. Unfortunately I could not get on any degree course as I had no GCSE's.

If the line up at Glastobury was really bobbins, it would not bother me in the slightest putting my tickets back in the pot.

I go for the music, however I couldn't really care who is playing, there's bound to be plenty I want to see. I don't get to many gigs though as I work away from home and just don't get the chance, so festivals ( I'm going to 4 this year) are really my only chance to see live music. The non music stuff is just mildly entertaining filler which whilst not a huge pull for me helps to make Glastonbury the special place it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, big__phil said:

I go because I like getting smashed and watching live music.

Anyone got any predictions then? The emerging talent has now closed (I think), so what do you think they're waiting for?

Probably just because they have no need to announce anything, the festival has already sold out, there haven't been any articles lately calming the headliners have been leaked and no artists have let it slip. Or maybe they are all their sat trying to come up with a clever way (like the radiohead grass painting) of announcing Ed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The delay at this point will relate to artist preferences. I think it'll be to do with tour announcements and ticket sales; to maximise profit before announcing anything else. 

The most obvious shout would be D-Rizzle. Maybe that's not in the bag yet. Perhaps everything we think we know isn't concrete at all. 

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

itd be nice to be tonight, hell itd be nice to have some form of announcement this month.....it really does feel like its being dragged out this year, sure we knew more then just 1 headliner by this time as of late as far as years go.......though I will consult the thingy unless wrong on that note. 

Edited by waterfalls212434
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Will-2609 said:

God it was annoying when we got to this stage for the poster announcements the last few years. Are we really now waiting every day to see if a second headliner or legend, all of whom we literally already know, is going to be announced?

I'd take a couple of good food stall confirmations at this point! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, nikkic said:

I'd take a couple of good food stall confirmations at this point! 

On that theme I think they get offered their pitches by end of this month at the latest so we might get some soon.

do any of the usual suspects have a twitter account?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...