Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Suprefan said:

Maybe Emily will figure out having Maty Healy doing a hitler salute on the tele is a bad idea. But wait, its ok, he is a white  rock star, he must not be cancelled.

 

 

Thanks Perez, but I think you're stretching it a little bit here. 

"Rock" star is a bit of a reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SheffJeff said:

I really don't like The 1975, I wouldn't go and see them if they were playing in my back garden and I genuinely hope they never headline but I think this is a song taking the piss out of the likes of Trump, Kanye & others? I struggle to believe that this is the moment in time he decides to come out to the world as a massive racist... I could be wrong, I often am but this would be career suicide and he would know this even if he was an anti semitic c**t rather than just a bit of a c**t.

Yes, one look at the song’s lyrics and it’s certainly an anti-Trump, Kanye etc song. He shouldn’t have done it, however, but it’s clear the intention is to call Kanye a Nazi.

Edited by WhoOdyssey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, SheffJeff said:

I really don't like The 1975, I wouldn't go and see them if they were playing in my back garden and I genuinely hope they never headline but I think this is a song taking the piss out of the likes of Trump, Kanye & others? I struggle to believe that this is the moment in time he decides to come out to the world as a massive racist... I could be wrong, I often am but this would be career suicide and he would know this even if he was an anti semitic c**t rather than just a bit of a c**t.

Pretty much nailed it. Don't think he's giving his support to the Third Reich, just making a poor attempt at satire.

Like you say though, he could actually be a Nazi, I've never played their records backwards and taken notes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Big durbs said:

That was last night , it’s reminds me I had set a record for it .

wonder if they are re broadcasting highlights to ramp up excitement just before an announcement ?

Not sure that many people are watching BBC4 at midnight tbh - doubt it means much

more likely to be for big weekend anyway i think - they only have 1 glasgow show and big weekend is nearer edinburgh so would make a lot of sense to be honest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2023 at 10:05 PM, gfa said:

Not sure that many people are watching BBC4 at midnight tbh - doubt it means much

more likely to be for big weekend anyway i think - they only have 1 glasgow show and big weekend is nearer edinburgh so would make a lot of sense to be honest

Literally no way the programmer of BBC4 gives the slightest shit about R1BW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeanoL said:

 

I was here in 2015, were you?

Are you going to answer my question of why you think they have secret sets then?

I was there in 2015 yes, I really enjoyed Florence so there was no issue for me.

They have secret sets to have secret sets, same reason as they have for decades now.

They've only really ever had one proper pyramid headliner sized one and that was the killers who then got the reward of a headline set the NEXT festival. The only time a band have actually pulled out fairly last minute in decades they actually bumped a sub up, rather than deploy an act they had earmarked for a secret set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Jose Pose said:

I was there in 2015 yes, I really enjoyed Florence so there was no issue for me.

They have secret sets to have secret sets, same reason as they have for decades now.

They've only really ever had one proper pyramid headliner sized one and that was the killers who then got the reward of a headline set the NEXT festival. The only time a band have actually pulled out fairly last minute in decades they actually bumped a sub up, rather than deploy an act they had earmarked for a secret set.

Gorillaz were a replacement for U2 rather than a sub bump up (but obviously no idea if they had any intention of doing a secret set)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

Gorillaz were a replacement for U2 rather than a sub bump up (but obviously no idea if they had any intention of doing a secret set)

Massively unlikely I'd say.  Especially given there's fuckloads of them plus all the special guests.  They wouldn't even all fit on a smaller stage!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

Massively unlikely I'd say.  Especially given there's fuckloads of them plus all the special guests.  They wouldn't even all fit on a smaller stage!

Yes my thought was always that it was a new booking after they found out U2 couldn't play. I think it probably just depends on the year whether there is a headliner sized act lying idle that weekend. If there is obviously in with a shot if not then a sub gets bumped up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jose Pose said:

I was there in 2015 yes, I really enjoyed Florence so there was no issue for me.

They have secret sets to have secret sets, same reason as they have for decades now.

They've only really ever had one proper pyramid headliner sized one and that was the killers who then got the reward of a headline set the NEXT festival. The only time a band have actually pulled out fairly last minute in decades they actually bumped a sub up, rather than deploy an act they had earmarked for a secret set.

You weren't on eFests and didn't see the whining though.

After Pulp/Radiohead in 2011 (who apparently aren't headliner-sized - will let Thom know) we didn't have any big-name secret sets until 2017. 

And my entire point is they didn't start doing this until after the issues in 2015 and *because* of them - because they didn't feel like bumping up a sub was a good option - you'll also note in 2015 there were no secret sets. Had Coldplay been doing a secret set on The Park in 2015 they absolutely would have had them replace Foo Fighters. You really think they wouldn't have?

What do you think they would have done in 2017 if Ed Sheeran broke his leg a couple of weeks before the festival then?

Edited by DeanoL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

You weren't on eFests and didn't see the whining though.

After Pulp/Radiohead in 2011 (who apparently aren't headliner-sized - will let Thom know) we didn't have any big-name secret sets until 2017. 

And my entire point is they didn't start doing this until after the issues in 2015 and *because* of them - because they didn't feel like bumping up a sub was a good option - you'll also note in 2015 there were no secret sets. Had Coldplay been doing a secret set on The Park in 2015 they absolutely would have had them replace Foo Fighters. You really think they wouldn't have?

What do you think they would have done in 2017 if Ed Sheeran broke his leg a couple of weeks before the festival then?

Do you think they say to acts "We don't want you as a headliner but here's £Xk to play a secret set. Don't take any other gigs that would pay you more. By the way, if the people we do want to headline drop out, will you do it then? Then we'll talk about paying you more."?

Maybe they do but I reckon you could be overthinking it. 

Taking your example of 2017, I guess you are saying The Killers would have stepped up if Ed dropped out? Perhaps, but what if Radiohead had dropped out? Would Elbow have got the nod?

What if it was Foos? Both The Killers and Elbow had gigs elsewhere, I don't believe there were any big names lined up for secret sets on the Saturday. 

I think much more likely that the sub each day would have been bumped up. The XX on Friday, The National on Saturday and Biffy on Sunday.

Much easier to pluck another act from the touring circuit and slot them in at the appropriate lever while everyone above them is bumped up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2023 at 8:50 PM, SighMo said:

You were actually serious weren’t you. 

I was 100% serious. It would have been another first for Glastonbury headline acts on the Pyramid Stage and a brave move. However it would seem they would rather play it safe with Guns n Roses, just another dull rock group that have been around nearly 40 years. However by what I have seen / heard of them these days, they should raise nearly as many laughs as Peter Kay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...