Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Secret sets 2022


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

Also worth adding that Amyl and the Sniffers are playing on JP on the Sunday and are on tour with Green Day; if they can travel from Huddersfield and do it and then on to Dublin next day why can't Green Day.  And as others have pointed out Green Day played a secret set in the R1 Tent at Reading a few years back so have done short secret sets before and won't need the full production suite that they have on tour.  

I actually think this may happen with Green Day going on to headline Glastonbury and Download next year.  Download is going to be 4 days next year so could easily accommodate Green Day along with more traditional rock headliners.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking Green Day is just too hard logistically. Killers had a few days off after their secret set, so I'm thinking Green Day isn't happening.

I'm going with 1975 for JP, Jack White for Park and Mumfords for WG.

I think War on Drugs just haven't been booked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not hating whatsoever (i enjoyed the read). But That Eminem info is the worst i've seen on this platform. As if 

a) he books his room in his name

b) comes to just 'scope out' the worlds biggest festival

c) performs just as a guest with an artist he's not remotely (strongly) linked to really

It's Eminem. 

Come on lads and lasses let's keep suggestions at least relatively plausible on here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, august1 said:

How busy would Jack White be at the Park if announced early? 

Busy, but hard to gage if it’d be ridiculously so. He’s still a big name who plays a lot of his old bands bangers, but has also gotten pretty weird with his solo stuff lately and isn’t quite the name he once was. The field would still be packed, but I’m unsure if they’d need to close it off for him…

edit: but I’m probably underestimating his appeal with a Glastonbury audience. Still a huge name regardless.

Edited by FloorFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FloorFiller said:

Busy, but hard to gage if it’d be ridiculously so. He’s still a big name who plays a lot of his old bands bangers, but has also gotten pretty weird with his solo stuff lately and isn’t quite the name he once was. The field would still be packed, but I’m unsure if they’d need to close it off for him…

I'm thinking if he's announced early could be a lesser crowd than AM/1975/GD fans all going up on the off chance. 

Depends on how many casual fans go up for a couple of hits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cuboid said:

Not hating whatsoever (i enjoyed the read). But That Eminem info is the worst i've seen on this platform. As if 

a) he books his room in his name

b) comes to just 'scope out' the worlds biggest festival

c) performs just as a guest with an artist he's not remotely (strongly) linked to really

It's Eminem. 

Come on lads and lasses let's keep suggestions at least relatively plausible on here. 

When I went to T in the Park he was on stage extremely late, apparently because they had to hire a coach to drive him across the muddy road to the stage so he didn't get his trainers dirty! Not sure how true that was, but can definitely see it 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Busy, but hard to gage if it’d be ridiculously so. He’s still a big name who plays a lot of his old bands bangers, but has also gotten pretty weird with his solo stuff lately and isn’t quite the name he once was. The field would still be packed, but I’m unsure if they’d need to close it off for him…

edit: but I’m probably underestimating his appeal with a Glastonbury audience. Still a huge name regardless.

I would guess it wouldn't be as busy as Foals on The Park last time, would you say that's fair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Green Day "logistics" argument is just going round and round in circles. It doesn't prove, or disprove anything.

Being in Huddersfield the day before, and Dublin the day after is meaningless in figuring out whether it's them playing or not. Far greater distances are travelled by acts on consecutive tour dates, all around the world, every week. It's really not an issue.

There are two travel routes:

  • Tour bus through the night. It's extremely common for the tour bus to set off immediately after a show, and travel during the night. Every touring act is entirely used to this.
  • Helicopter. As mentioned, it's around an hour.

Almost none, if any, of the equipment will be shared between the main tour and Glastonbury. Everything will be in place waiting for them. They are one of the most successful bands of the past 30 years, it really isn't a problem, any logistics are very easily arranged.

But none of this means that they are playing. All I mean to say is the "logistically impossible" argument is just wrong. And especially since Amyl and the Sniffers, literally on the same tour as them, are playing the same stage, on the same day. There is no logistical challenge here at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Colorblindjames said:

This thread is starting to resemble transfer deadline day when players are spotted at airports or motorway service stations. 

P.s. did someone not mention Due Lipa on the telly this morning when talking about the 50th anniversary TV show on Sunday night.

She has a gig on the Sunday too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My nerves can't cope with another 'please let it happen' thread akin to the weather one!

Green Day are one of my all time favourite bands and seeing them at Glastonbury would be a dream. I would rather someone just came up with something now to rule them out completely, as I think its highly improbable, yet still possible 😬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, downtherabbithole said:

Just seen that the drive from Huddersfield to Glastonbury is over 5 hours. Let's say they're off stage by 11 and somehow managed to set off by midnight. They'd have to drive through the night on their tour bus, or set off around 7am the next morning. All of this also rubbishes the rumour of them staying at that hotel near Glastonbury (unless that's the night after the set). Makes it very unlikely unless they have a private jet or are that set on playing a 1 hour Glastonbury set that they are willing to forego a proper night's sleep in between a successive run of tour dates. 

They ain't gonna be driving the bus. Isn't that one of The Sniffer's jobs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sku said:

The Green Day "logistics" argument is just going round and round in circles. It doesn't prove, or disprove anything.

Being in Huddersfield the day before, and Dublin the day after is meaningless in figuring out whether it's them playing or not. Far greater distances are travelled by acts on consecutive tour dates, all around the world, every week. It's really not an issue.

There are two travel routes:

  • Tour bus through the night. It's extremely common for the tour bus to set off immediately after a show, and travel during the night. Every touring act is entirely used to this.
  • Helicopter. As mentioned, it's around an hour.

Almost none, if any, of the equipment will be shared between the main tour and Glastonbury. Everything will be in place waiting for them. They are one of the most successful bands of the past 30 years, it really isn't a problem, any logistics are very easily arranged.

But none of this means that they are playing. All I mean to say is the "logistically impossible" argument is just wrong. And especially since Amyl and the Sniffers, literally on the same tour as them, are playing the same stage, on the same day. There is no logistical challenge here at all.

100%. And this is also why The Smile shouldn’t be ruled out for the Park slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't handle all this chat of Green Day, Arcade Fire, LCD, The Smile and 1975 (my gf's absolute favourite band), I cannot believe that any of them are going to play, just to be left heartbroken.

Wouldn't the bigger surprise set be on The Park rather than John Peel? I just noticed they have a 45 min set-up time for that TBC, compared to 30 for everyone else on that stage... also going up against Elbow, Kacey M, Turnstile and Mcfly (lol) means theres good competition there, surely this is the bigger surprise act??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...