Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Secret sets 2022


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

Right, so I was also told in this exact fashion "a certain Mr M Mathers" is booked in to stay at Babington House as well.

My response (not knowing any of Kendrick's stuff that well or even if their is a link between the two) was to initially laugh then express my disbelief as I see no way in a million years he'd do a secret set but followed up by saying perhaps he'll come on with Kendrick as a special guest or something.

But having looked online this morning there doesn't to be anything suggesting that apart from they've ever performed together live, unless anyone who knows Kendrick / Eminem's stuff better?

Also, does Kendrick do special guests? I have no idea.

Anyway, my mate then said (he definitely believed what he was told even if I didn't!) he wondered if it might be a case that Eminem isn't necessarily performing but coming over to watch Kendrick / scope out the festival because perhaps he's been asked to perform next year?

I'll leave it for you guys to tear apart now!

Want to believe the green day info but find it unlikely that Eminem would book his own room, under his own name…would love to be proved wrong. 
 

big fan of this speculation this close to the festival though. Hope we have no idea until the day off and see posters/flags like biffy did all that time ago 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, doodlesbyben said:

Hey pals, has anyone got a brief rundown of any confirmed acts for the secret slots and also any strong rumours? 

 

Trying to scroll pack through 49 pages to understand what has been shared is proving a tad tricky.

 

thank you 

wouldn't say there's any strong rumours but for the secret slots the main names being thrown about are:

Green Day, Jack White, 1975, The War on Drugs, Arctic Monkeys, The Smile, Anderson .Paak, Harry Styles, Paulo Nutini (also Mumford and Sons and Bastille for the Thursday William's Green slot) At this stage, trying to guess who it will be feels like picking the grand national winner.

If I had to bet though, I'd go for Green Day and The War on Drugs based on the current info. And Mumford for that William's Green slot

Edited by downtherabbithole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Stokesy10 said:

I can't even begin to let this slip into my mind. I would be in pieces.

It's far too difficult for them logistically to do so. 

This is were I stand! 

Green Day were my favourite band as a teenager and I've seen them 7 times (with the last being about 16 years ago). 

If they walk out at 2pm in JP, I'd literally lose my mind. For that reason, it can;t and wont happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

all dependent on whether the info comes out before or not

It almost definitely will. They’ve done a good job of keeping it quiet thus far, but I can’t see them keeping it a secret right up until the band walks out on stage. Plus, crowds will swarm regardless in the hope that it’s Arctic Monkeys or something even if a strong rumour of it being somebody else is out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jparx said:

Jack White in John Peel, War on Drugs on the Park. That's where my money is at right now.

I think that’s were I am as well, although at this point it’s still up for grabs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jparx said:

Jack White in John Peel, War on Drugs on the Park. That's where my money is at right now.

War on Drugs are no way near big enough for a tbc of that calibre. When I previous years its been huge house hold names

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

With you on Jack White. Really don’t see the Park one being TWOD though - mass exodus waiting to happen imo. 

TWOD would probably land around 3rd from top on the Pyramid if they were announced. Isn't that a fairly big name for the Park? Not sure we'll have anyone that much bigger than that. Maybe Biffy if they could leg it down from Edinburgh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jparx said:

TWOD would probably land around 3rd from top on the Pyramid if they were announced. Isn't that a fairly big name for the Park? Not sure we'll have anyone that much bigger than that. Maybe Biffy if they could leg it down from Edinburgh.

TWOD are a weird one because they’re obviously big but they’re not really a household name or riddled with well known songs or bangers. I’d like them to be one of the secret sets, but I feel whoever they turn out to be will be more household names with well known songs. Think TWOD would’ve just been booked to play on the lineup if they were gonna be there in any capacity.

Edited by FloorFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

TWOD are a weird one because they’re obviously big but they’re not really a household name or riddled with well known songs or bangers. I’d like them to be one of the secret sets, but I feel whoever they turn out to be will be more household names with well known songs. Think TWOD would’ve just been booked to play on the lineup if they were gonna be there in any capacity.

Yeah that's the major mark against them IMO.

Hell, maybe Jack White is Park and Green Day are in JPT after all. I just think it's a fantasy, but who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...