Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Secret sets 2022


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, JoeyT said:

I don't even know if I'd class it as info tbh. Unlike the Arcadia / headliner stuff I was told back in January which came from a straight up legit source.

This is just some of the shite you hear living fairly local to the festival which 99.9% time turns out to be rubbish.

Yeah not totally beyond the realms of believability in my opinion. 

There are links between the artists, and Kendrick has worked with Dr Dre on his album, appearing with Eminem on some tracks. All of them shared a stage at the Superbowl halftime show for example...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF (big if) it turned out one of them was Green Day, would that be the first instance of a big TBA/secret set being the acts first time playing the festival and them not already being an established friend of the festival type? Not counting the likes of Kesha who were relatively small at the time of their secret sets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

It almost definitely will. They’ve done a good job of keeping it quiet thus far, but I can’t see them keeping it a secret right up until the band walks out on stage. Plus, crowds will swarm regardless in the hope that it’s Arctic Monkeys or something even if a strong rumour of it being somebody else is out there. 

yeah from a safety perspective its a lot easier if its known - just as many will be put off as will be wanting to go up there. Much better than a ridiculous Harry Styles rumour leading to loads of uninterested people watching, for example, the War on Drugs or something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of the Eminem info, Kendrick and him did perform recently together at the Super Bowl, maybe they discussed Glastonbury then? They was also rumours at the time of Kendrick, Eminem, Dr Dre and Snoop Dogg doing a tour together in the near future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

IF (big if) it turned out one of them was Green Day, would that be the first instance of a big TBA/secret set being the acts first time playing the festival and them not already being an established friend of the festival type? Not counting the likes of Kesha who were relatively small at the time of their secret sets.

and also completely unopposed in terms of a similar genre of music. Madness if so - would need to get in for the first act of the day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

IF (big if) it turned out one of them was Green Day, would that be the first instance of a big TBA/secret set being the acts first time playing the festival and them not already being an established friend of the festival type? Not counting the likes of Kesha who were relatively small at the time of their secret sets.

Kesha had a US number 1 album by then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Billy Corgan's Ego said:

How long would you need to get to the tent for to be confident of being able to get in for this TBA? I would stand there for a few hours if it was looking like being Green Day. 

How long before The Killers walked on stage did we know it was going to be them?

I got there over an hour early and was barely in the tent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

TWOD are a weird one because they’re obviously big but they’re not really a household name or riddled with well known songs or bangers. I’d like them to be one of the secret sets, but I feel whoever they turn out to be will be more household names with well known songs. Think TWOD would’ve just been booked to play on the lineup if they were gonna be there in any capacity.

They could have been a late booking, not wanted their name out there due to playing Bristol Sounds the day after. It is strange though. They're playing Hyde Park supporting the Stones with other acts that are playing Glasto (Phoebe Bridgers, Courtney Barrett, Sam Fender). They'll be coming up to Somserset either Saturday night or Sunday. They fit that park slot nicely, although i appreciate they're obviously not as big as Pulp or Radiohead or others that have played it in the past (probably on the same level as The Foals though who played it). If it's not them, then it's a definitely a big miss by Emily to get them at the farm. Probably the best live rock n roll band in the world right now.

Edited by downtherabbithole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Billy Corgan's Ego said:

How long would you need to get to the tent for to be confident of being able to get in for this TBA? I would stand there for a few hours if it was looking like being Green Day. 

How long before The Killers walked on stage did we know it was going to be them?

I got wind of it the day before, but to be fair I was going for Frank Carter anyway. It was really busy at FC. If the TBA is somebody I definitely don't want to miss, I will get there for Sports Team just to be safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Billy Corgan's Ego said:

How long would you need to get to the tent for to be confident of being able to get in for this TBA? I would stand there for a few hours if it was looking like being Green Day. 

How long before The Killers walked on stage did we know it was going to be them?

I got to the JP for the Killers whilst Frank Carter was on (about mid set) and just managed to squeeze in the tent for their set. I’d get there before Sports Team and stay there for their whole set if you want a guaranteed place in the tent - it’ll get busy fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 14er said:

I think green day are nailed on for JP now tbh

Based on what? They're playing in Huddersfield the night before at a big event. They'll get off stage, full of adrenaline, no doubt indulge a little bit.

They'd have to either travel down towards Glastonbury immediately after their huddersfield gig late into the night, or get up the next morning and set off no later than 8am to make sure they arrive at the festival in time, leaving enough time to get to where they need to be within the festival.

Don't get me wrong I would love it, but the odds are very much stacked against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 14er said:

It was well rumoured over the weekend but nothing concrete

It was pretty well known it was the killers by that time. I was there for Frank Carter and the Rattlesnakes, they were one of my must sees anyway. Frank Carter wanted a circle pit with people going out and around the tent, but some went out and never came back in. I remember him joking about the front rows are now the Killer fans only. It was very well known by that time.

 

I’m not a massive the Killers fan, but that set was something else.

 

Edited by Nessipessi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nessipessi said:

It was pretty well known it was the killers by that time. I was there for Frank Carter and the Rattlesnakes, they were one of my must sees anyway. Frank Carter wanted a circle pit with people going out and around the tent, but some went out and never came back in. I remember him joking about the front rows are now the Killer fans only. It was very well known by that time.

 

I’m not a massive the Killers fan, but that set was something else.

I latched on to that circle pit which allowed me to get slightly in to the tent 😋 nice one Frank!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the start of the weekend, there was an advert for the iplayer coverage stating ‘Don’t miss that killer set’. 
 

Given that there were already rumours, I took that as confirmation, as was proved right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...