Jump to content

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

Just now, balthazarstarbuck said:

Rate of increase is slowing (ie not doubling every week) so on current trajectories could flatline in 10 days or so. Worth noting 7 day rolling R went down even with a freak number today.

It’s definitely improved from a week and a half ago.

I think 2 weeks is wishful thinking, but you never know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

 

Now that's not true. Two jabs (and one, to a lesser extent) severely decrease your risk of GETTING the virus full stop. They protect against serious illness to an even greater degree, but they do protect very well against infection altogether.

And if you do get it, because the symptoms are lessened, you shed less virus, so are still less likely to pass it on even if symptomatic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Very early signs we are heading in the right direction but we could be in for some concerning days with total case numbers.

https://news.sky.com/story/uk-reports-more-than-11000-new-covid-cases-and-another-19-deaths-12334965
this article says we should see a week or 2 worth of worse data before an improvement thanks to the slow down, if we add in some more vaccinations we should be on an okay track overall 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Leyrulion said:

This is actually really bad management both by the PR and him (unless that's what they're going for...)

He should have been prepped to expect the question and have a decent segway response out of it. 

I agree, why doesn’t he just say yes he thinks Hancock is good at his job, I presume he’s told a lie before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I agree, why doesn’t he just say yes he thinks Hancock is good at his job, I presume he’s told a lie before?

I think it speaks wonders of his morals not to answer.

I agree he could have possibly spun it but there has to be a good egg somewhere in the system who doesn’t simply nod and wave when being pressured to lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

I think it speaks wonders of his morals not to answer.

I agree he could have possibly spun it but there has to be a good egg somewhere in the system who doesn’t simply nod and wave when being pressured to lie.

If he was thinking of his morales he probably should’ve spoken out against a hopeless Health Secretary during the middle of the biggest public health crises we’ve seen in a century. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

If he was thinking of his morales he probably should’ve spoken out against a hopeless Health Secretary during the middle of the biggest public health crises we’ve seen in a century. 

So the government could have then hung him out to dry?

We both know that wouldn’t have ended up well for him.

He’s said what he thinks without even opening his mouth. It’s perfect.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

So the government could have then hung him out to dry?

We both know that wouldn’t have ended up well for him.

He’s said what he thinks without even opening his mouth. It’s perfect.

It's possible his post is politically restricted, certain posts all over the public sector are even in local government such as CFO are. This stops you standing for, participating in or speaking in public at large to show an affiliation for any political party.

The roles covered by this tend to be listed on a public sector organisations website along with the policy and state things like this:

Speaking to the public at large or publishing any written or artistic work that could 
give the impression that they are advocating support for a political party or someone 
seeking to be a candidate; where the intention is to affect public support for a 
political party. This includes giving an interview that is likely to result in the 
publication of statements made or opinions expressed

That's tower Hamlets but they are all by and large the same.

 

Edited by RobertProsineckisLighter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

So the government could have then hung him out to dry?

We both know that wouldn’t have ended up well for him.

That would imply he’s not being moralist if he’s thinking of his job, which is totally fair enough.

Either way it’s not a good look for Hancock. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jannybruck said:

I hate wearing face coverings on and off in the pub/cafe/restaurant but - without exception - the ones I've been to have staff of an age where they're probably not vaccinated yet (and possibly feeling a bit anxious about it all), so even if it's a semi-pointless bit of theatre at this point, at least I feel like I'm showing them a bit of respect when I'm passing them to go for a piss or walking around them. It's irritating but I can put up with it for a bit longer.

As someone in hospitality (although double jabbed myself) thank you. 

It's also the fact that we (largely minimum wage or slightly more) are being asked to enforce these rules whether we want to or not. And the constant push back is fucking exhausting.  Being asked a few times a day to wear your mask might be annoying. Having to ask tens if not hundreds of times a day and getting shit for it just grinds you down. I feel like I have an insight into what is like working for WH Smith, having to ask every customer if they want to buy a Dairy Milk. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

Government priorities...

You realise that:

 

- These guys will all be regularly PCR tested

- Vast majority will be jabbed

- If they don’t do this we’ll literally get the euros semis and final taken off us.

 

This is a no brainer move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

You realise that:

 

- These guys will all be regularly PCR tested

- Vast majority will be jabbed

- If they don’t do this we’ll literally get the euros semis and final taken off us.

 

This is a no brainer move. 

That's irrelevant really when you have half the population regularly PCR tested, double jabbed and they cant even go to a supermarket without a mask. Its rubbing it in peoples faces that its one rule for the rich and one rules for everyone else. 

They have can have the semis and finals, couldnt care less. 

Edited by Havors
  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Havors said:

That's irrelevant really when you have half the population regularly PCR tested, double jabbed and they cant even go to a supermarket without a mask. Its rubbing it in peoples faces that its one rule for the rich and one rules for everyone else. 

They have can have the semis and finals, couldnt care less. 

That’s an argument for scrapping silly rules, not an argument against football coming home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

That’s an argument for scrapping silly rules, not an argument against football coming home. 

Correct. Why would I argue against football coming home? I would let them come over...

However, we cant use the argument that they are vaccinated and take tests to let the officials come over. Because that just takes the piss out of everyone in the country that has been jabbed and takes tests.

Just be honest and say we want to blow smoke up their ass to have the semis and final here. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • You are on point again this year I see fella 😀 
    • As resident Drake fan I've got to chime in here! Also a Kendrick fan of course, it's possible to be both. The whole beef is probably one of the few exciting events in mainstream US hip hop in recent years and certainly more of an event than both of their most recent albums... Firstly, Kendrick won the beef, but at what cost? Firstly there's the personal integrity question which is probably taking a big hit. At one point you could have posited him as the moral vanguard of hip hop but he's indulged conspiracy theorism in this (effectively and with a fair slice of humour, but conspiracy nonetheless) barrage of diss tracks, not to mention that he lapped up some deliberate BS fed by Drake's team and put it in a song. Obviously Mr. Morale itself goes some way towards distancing himself from the saintly projection from fans, the media and the world at large, but in the diss tracks he is adopting a 'we the people' voice and airing out the grievances and theories of drake haters worldwide and it must be cathartic for all of them. And he's good at it, but lets not confuse what he's doing here with some of his Pulitzer work.  .  And then of course the accusation that he beat his fiancee up and hired a crisis management team to clear it up is a pretty heavy one and you know, quite a long way away from "Godspeed for women's rights". Thirdly, he didn't really attempt to answer any questions about his own affairs, which is fine for now, he had plenty of mud to sling at Drake, and a world ready to listen, but someone will come for him one day and he won't have the same ammo to respond with and I guess that might be tactical victory, strategic failure. But he can still rely on being able to outrap nearly anyone else. For Drake, obviously it's been a pretty bruising encounter, especially because Kendrick used his own playbook against him in terms of how the beef played out with back to back releases and even a catchy club tune that will get singalongs all summer. But Drake's disses were pretty solid, well constructed and well rapped with lots of points scored and if he couldn't land a decisive blow against Kendrick, he certainly made the other co-ordinated agitators (Future, MetroBoomin, The Weeknd) look pretty silly. Rick Ross is now the old man angry at clouds meme.   It's likely that both achieve extended relevance from this spat based on the streaming numbers. Drake is like Taylor Swift in that he releases music at an astonishing rate. I can't see this really making a significant dent in that cadence but hopefully it might inspire something better than his dull recent output. Kendrick hasn't done numbers like this for a while. It's a bit annoying that like 'Humble', it's his worst tracks that cut through (I'm calling 'Not like us' garbage, sorry.)   There's an element of proof in the pudding for Drake in the fact that this beef is happening at all. In terms of motivation for Kendrick starting this beef, he clearly just wanted to prove he's number 1, responding to Drake & J.Cole's track "First Person Shooter" last year. Why is Kendrick so bothered? Why does he have this visceral hatred of all things Aubrey? Why has he thrown the absolute kitchen sink at him, noting every personal grievance, every rumour and conspiracy and even bringing family into it and throwing some pretty questionable racial politics into the mix? It's not an act of benevolence to the wider world but an attempt to see off a rival and be crowned the undisputed best rapper alive. To do that he had to defeat Drake, and throw it all on the line to do so. Would and should Drake play Glastonbury? The most obvious point is he fulfils most of the objective-ish criteria that gets bandied about on here to evaluate whether an act is a suitable headliner. One of the most commercially successful artists of recent times, a number of critically acclaimed releases, sellout arena tours and number one records. Arguably he's the rap equivalent of Coldplay - a mega artist who has evolved his music over the years in accordance with the trends of the time rather than imposing his artistic vision upon the world, and generally having what would be considered a broad rather than deep appeal. Obviously a lot of people think Coldplay are shite but few argue their credentials to headline. His creative peak was the middle years of the last decade with a number of great releases from 2012 through to 2018ish. Take Care (2012) and Nothing Was The Same (2014) are classic rap albums for me, the sort that have sadly died out. Scorpion was probably the turning point where, there were more stinkers than solid ones, but a bit like Taylor Swift's most recent album, a curated playlist picking out an hours worth of material from the record would make a very decent album. He's clearly far from a terrible rapper too, although he is prone to having many songs based around a similar subject matter and hasn't demonstrated lots of artistic growth from the early years.   I'd say we're probably now entering the era where he could play. Whether he would be booked is another matter as I'd say mainstream opinion in the UK would be dead against it. But as far as the economics around it are concerned, I think he could become a festival sized act again, in the same way that Taylor Swift is probably 'above' festival sized right now.    
    • next week it is then (was holding out a glimmer of hope but alas)
    • To have 'Instant Removal' you need to leave the ECHR and likely leave the UN too. Are you willing to have both of those happen?
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...