Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

What are peoples expectations from Peter Pandemics announcement later today? I agree with others that a month long stint in Tier 4 for England would be the right move, get a degree of control back to assist the rollout. 

However, with the vaccine announcement today I expect the minimum possible changes, a couple of Tier 2 areas to Tier 3 and 1 or 2 Tier 3 areas to Tier 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, zahidf said:

And @Toilet Duck. Be interested in his take on the 12 week thing.

Haven’t seen updated data yet, but there was a signal for a longer wait between doses in their lancet paper. My best guess is the pause in the US trial led to many more participants getting dose 2 a lot later than planned and the data has firmed up because of that...but don’t know yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gingerfish79 said:

What are peoples expectations from Peter Pandemics announcement later today? I agree with others that a month long stint in Tier 4 for England would be the right move, get a degree of control back to assist the rollout. 

However, with the vaccine announcement today I expect the minimum possible changes, a couple of Tier 2 areas to Tier 3 and 1 or 2 Tier 3 areas to Tier 4.

Whatever tier movement happens is completely pointless unless it's accompanied by proper school closures. It's just like rearranging the furniture while your living room's on fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Homer said:

I understand that the Brexit deal didn't secure frictionless trade. Surely this means more border chaos from 1 Jan? Been looking around and can't find much on this, when it seems to be quite a big/obvious problem (I could be wrong - obviously).

Trade experts were saying issues there were inevitable with or without a deal. Will be interesting to see what's on the shelves next few weeks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gingerfish79 said:

What are peoples expectations from Peter Pandemics announcement later today? I agree with others that a month long stint in Tier 4 for England would be the right move, get a degree of control back to assist the rollout. 

However, with the vaccine announcement today I expect the minimum possible changes, a couple of Tier 2 areas to Tier 3 and 1 or 2 Tier 3 areas to Tier 4.

I'm expecting tiers to remain, with most of the country in >tier 3.

I also expect there to be school closures, but not sure whether they will be part of a "tier 5" or nationwide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

Haven’t seen updated data yet, but there was a signal for a longer wait between doses in their lancet paper. My best guess is the pause in the US trial led to many more participants getting dose 2 a lot later than planned and the data has firmed up because of that...but don’t know yet.

Do you know if new data has been released yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Do you know if new data has been released yet?

Haven’t seen anything yet unfortunately! It will come in due course, but they have been taking the traditional publication route rather than releasing pre-prints with their trial data, so that takes a good bit longer. Normally we’d get detailed data at conferences, but those are all online at the moment!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I'm expecting tiers to remain, with most of the country in >tier 3.

I also expect there to be school closures, but not sure whether they will be part of a "tier 5" or nationwide.

yeah, do they close schools nationwide seeing as some areas obviously have much higher cases than others?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, st dan said:

Surely school closures would need to be an ‘all or nothing’ approach? Wouldn’t have thought it being an option to close schools in specific badly affected regions would it? 

In effect schools in badly affected areas have been shut repeatedly for the last 3 month. Son in law has been zoom schooled for 6 weeks in the first term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of my colleagues had children at home for big parts of the last term due to year groups being sent home or ad hoc closures. I think it's better to just formalise it and say schools are closed for January. Unless they do that (and delay students returning to halls) then all the pub or shop closures in the world won't make a blind bit of difference. 

Edited by sadimmock
The debate had moved on
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sadimmock said:

Most of my colleagues had children at home for big parts of the last term due to year groups being sent home or ad hoc closures. I think it's better to just formalise it and say schools are closed for January. Unless they do that (and delay students returning to halls) then all the pub or shop closures in the world won't make a blind bit of difference. 

I think they should do that too, only if it’s clear their plan has failed for mass testing in schools. Schools should be the last thing to close and looking at the figures and according to the scientists we are at that point. They need to give people clarity!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Is it bad to say that i want to take the AstraZeneca vaccine over the others? I want a BRITISH made vaccine which is made with OUR LAWS by BRITISH universities? 🇬🇧 

The sad thing about this is that there are definitely going to be a few people seriously saying this on twitter today, rather than your tongue in cheek post (which I found quite funny).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Is it bad to say that i want to take the AstraZeneca vaccine over the others? I want a BRITISH made vaccine which is made with OUR LAWS by BRITISH universities? 🇬🇧 

Closer to the truth than some may remember:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/27/no-10-reportedly-wanted-union-flag-on-oxford-coronavirus-vaccine-kits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Homer said:

I'm still sceptical about these new fangled 'vaccines' (I received a pretty compelling meme in my football team's WhatsApp group the other day).

well....check out the test data, and then weigh up risk of a side effect from vaccine, or catching virus and getting ill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...