Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

TBAs 2019


Tuna

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Chef said:

I've not been following this thread. Could somebody please summarise any info/ current thinking? 

Mr efestivals has had info that foals are playing on Saturday. I’d be amazed if they don’t appear somewhere. There’s a big glasto shaped hole in their otherwise packed touring schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, RyanSmith9311 said:

Will be devastated if the JP headliner turns out to be Foals 

Despite the customary military planning to create my Glastonbury schedule, I had completely forgotten that the JPT Saturday headliner was still a TBA.

Killers - will draw a huge crowd

Chem - will draw a huge crowd

Hot Chip - will draw a pretty big (for Park) crowd

So, it'll be interesting to see just what they pull out of the bag for JPT to divide further an already pretty well spread-out festival crowd...

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Madyaker said:

Mr efestivals has had info that foals are playing on Saturday. I’d be amazed if they don’t appear somewhere. There’s a big glasto shaped hole in their otherwise packed touring schedule.

Thanks - although that has added to the current Saturday clash anxiety. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, bennyhana22 said:

Despite the customary military planning to create my Glastonbury schedule, I had completely forgotten that the JPT Saturday headliner was still a TBA.

Killers - will draw a huge crowd

Chem - will draw a huge crowd

Hot Chip - will draw a pretty big (for Park) crowd

So, it'll be interesting to see just what they pull out of the bag for JPT to divide further an already pretty well spread-out festival crowd...

Ben

It will be interesting to see if they try and keep it under wraps until the band goes on stage. I may be wrong, but I can't imagine too many people taking a gamble on their Saturday night headliner for a mystery guest, especially when you have such big options in The Killers, Chems, Hot Chip and Wu-Tang. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jparx said:

It will be interesting to see if they try and keep it under wraps until the band goes on stage. I may be wrong, but I can't imagine too many people taking a gamble on their Saturday night headliner for a mystery guest, especially when you have such big options in The Killers, Chems, Hot Chip and Wu-Tang. 

Absolutely. For me, the only logical explanation seems to be that Diplo pulled out just before the announcement, it was never intended to be a secret set and now and they're finding a replacement. I reckon someone (probably similar type of music or at least dancey) will just quietly get added. Putting Foals there would be a very strange move, Park earlier makes way more sense (especially as that info came way before the Diplo thing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Martini Police said:

Absolutely. For me, the only logical explanation seems to be that Diplo pulled out just before the announcement, it was never intended to be a secret set and now and they're finding a replacement. I reckon someone (probably similar type of music or at least dancey) will just quietly get added. Putting Foals there would be a very strange move, Park earlier makes way more sense (especially as that info came way before the Diplo thing).

Thom Yorke to the rescue ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Martini Police said:

On another note, where are we at with William's Green Thursday? Just Big Moon expected at the moment, no other strong info?

Pale Waves is the only info that we have on the WG live bands. Big Moon’s just a guess because they’re not on the lineup despite the ‘warm up show’.

4 minutes ago, The Martini Police said:

Absolutely. For me, the only logical explanation seems to be that Diplo pulled out just before the announcement, it was never intended to be a secret set and now and they're finding a replacement. I reckon someone (probably similar type of music or at least dancey) will just quietly get added. Putting Foals there would be a very strange move, Park earlier makes way more sense (especially as that info came way before the Diplo thing).

That or it’s Silk City and they wanna be announced later, like they were for Bestival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2019 at 3:33 PM, bennyhana22 said:

Despite the customary military planning to create my Glastonbury schedule, I had completely forgotten that the JPT Saturday headliner was still a TBA.

Killers - will draw a huge crowd

Chem - will draw a huge crowd

Hot Chip - will draw a pretty big (for Park) crowd

So, it'll be interesting to see just what they pull out of the bag for JPT to divide further an already pretty well spread-out festival crowd...

Ben

Yeh, Saturday is a right bugger for me. My brother is coming with us for his Glasto debut. I'm torn between Chems and Killers, but I know he'd love Killers, plus I think that's an excellent Pyramid introduction for him - I'm confident it'll be memorable. However.... if Doves or Strokes are (albeit unlikely) the TBA for John Peel, I will 100% be watching them, subsequently jeopardising that "Pyramid Moment" with the older sibling, cos he wouldn't enjoy either of Strokes/Doves.

PLUS - I've never seen Chems... mind f***.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2019 at 2:36 PM, gigpusher said:

Is there any chance that Bikini Kill could be one of the TBA's or should I just give up on that dream. Just seen the clip of Joan Jett joining them on stage for Rebel Girl and god I'd love to see them. 

So @Keithy speculated that that they could be the Very Special Guests in the Sista Sunday All Femme All Day takeover of Truth stage (I think?). Really struggling to find this on clashfinder or on the official site now though. But the line up poster is below. You going to the gig on Monday? Absolutely buzzing for it! Would love to see them again at the festival. Would be insane. 

Screenshot_20190608-101723_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually thinking about it I guess the Very Special Surprise Guests slot was announced when the full line-up came out? Would explain why I can't find on clashfinder or anywhere now.

Aside from this, would love to see Jarv Is and really hoping they are on The Park.

Could anyone do a handy summary of what the consensus is on these TBAs thus far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

So @Keithy speculated that that they could be the Very Special Guests in the Sista Sunday All Femme All Day takeover of Truth stage (I think?). Really struggling to find this on clashfinder or on the official site now though. But the line up poster is below. You going to the gig on Monday? Absolutely buzzing for it! Would love to see them again at the festival. Would be insane. 

Screenshot_20190608-101723_Chrome.jpg

Unfortunately not. Couldn't afford a trip to London this close to Glastonbury hence why I am wishing, hoping and praying they turn up at Glastonbury or failing that do a bigger more extensive tour that includes a Manchester date. Will keep an ear out on the TBA's and if it is them I'll definitely be there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...