Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Coachella


mccdyl001

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, 1986 said:

I'm not a parent and don't plan to be, so this comes from a detached point of view so take from that what you want.

But with WAP being the common example here of corrupting 14 year old girls. Maybe people should consider maybe this song wasn't written for a 14 year old girl. It's a club banger for adults to get down to and for adult women to, yes, maybe feel some empowerment, or seen, on the idea that their desires are as filthy and legitimate as any man's. And when these 14 year olds grow up it'll be in a better world where they can be as expressive as they want without feeling shamed by it.

(I know I'm making WAP sound like some sort of world changing classic which might sound dumb but all culture makes a small bit of difference somewhere, and it did feel fresh when it came out and still does). 

And obviously parents can't watch what their child takes in 24 hours a day especially now when they likely have a whole world of god knows what in their hands. But with that being the case WAP or any other dirty lyric song should be the least of their problems, and maybe parents should be less inclined to blame a song for putting sexual ideas in a kid's head and more inclined to have the conversation about sex with their children first so something as innocuous as a song doesn't completely shatter their young minds like people seem to think it will.

That’s not strictly true, TikTok is another platform for artists (or their people) to get songs trending. Songs trend and then either have some sort of linked activity that everyone replicates, or the songs are used as the theme tune for the videos people post. DC and MTS have both had songs trend massively on there, and the demographic is very definitely not ‘club banger for adults’. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Miyn said:

She's probably the act I'm most looking forward to seeing at Latitude this year. Punisher was my AOTY in 2020, and her setlist is pretty heavy on that album, so seeing it live will be awesome. Excited to hear what she puts out next as it's approaching two years since that album. If she releases something of that quality again I think she could become huge, she's already sold out all of her UK shows with demand for a lot more.

Yeah absolutely agree, been living life for that festival moment since 2020, quite like the Latitude gig now, will make up for the slight disappointment if she’s a dross 6pm on the other stage rather than the headlining moment we all want 🤞

and no pressure backing up that album Phoebe, sidelines is allegedly all she’s putting out this year so we might have a little wait, she is a busy person this year so I’ll let her off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

That’s not strictly true, TikTok is another platform for artists (or their people) to get songs trending. Songs trend and then either have some sort of linked activity that everyone replicates, or the songs are used as the theme tune for the videos people post. DC and MTS have both had songs trend massively on there, and the demographic is very definitely not ‘club banger for adults’. 

TikTok ≠ 14 Year Old Girls

I confess to not really getting TikTok but in my job as a bookseller we have over the last couple of years become used to books blowing up on TikTok and the customers buying these titles are definitely more the 18-25 demographic than the under 16s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

That’s not strictly true, TikTok is another platform for artists (or their people) to get songs trending. Songs trend and then either have some sort of linked activity that everyone replicates, or the songs are used as the theme tune for the videos people post. DC and MTS have both had songs trend massively on there, and the demographic is very definitely not ‘club banger for adults’. 

Absolutely, like I said kids have their phones and are going to see things not meant for them. But my point still stands that parents should be up front about the content and explain it to them, if they're old enough to grasp what the song is saying then parents should be recognising that and giving them the facts. Not trying to hide it from them in a world where that's impossible to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mcshed said:

TikTok ≠ 14 Year Old Girls

I confess to not really getting TikTok but in my job as a bookseller we have over the last couple of years become used to books blowing up on TikTok and the customers buying these titles are definitely more the 18-25 demographic than the under 16s.

Well I came off TikTok after a month because my FYP was mostly teenage girls doing some sort of trend to these sort of artists. I don’t really watch normal TV and never listen to commercial radio so I’d not really heard of DC or MTS until they appeared on the poster, as soon as I listened to a few of their songs I instantly recognise them from TikTok. My point really is that there are many mediums now, and songs aren’t necessarily designed to be heard in clubs full of 18+ year olds, they’re also deliberately pushed on mediums that attract a much younger audience.

Edited by Deaf Nobby Burton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Well I came off TikTok after a month because my FYP was mostly teenage girls doing some sort of trend to these sort of artists.

Do you know how the algorithm on TikTok works? Outed yourself there lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Well I came off TikTok after a month because my FYP was mostly teenage girls doing some sort of trend to these sort of artists. I don’t really watch normal TV and never listen to commercial radio so I’d not really heard of DC or MYS until they appeared on the poster, as soon as I listened to a few of their songs I instantly recognise them from TikTok. My point really is that there are many mediums now, and songs aren’t necessarily designed to be heard in clubs full of 18+ year olds, they’re also deliberately pushed on mediums that attract a much younger audience.

The trollish response would be that the fact that your time on TikTok was spent watching young girls dancing to explicit songs isn't the rest of our problems.

But seriously the internet in general means that unedited explicit content is available to all, my kids are only 6 and 3 but already I don't look forward to trying to navigate their transition towards maturity online as what is an isn't appropriate isn't an easy thing to judge even with complete control which you obviously don't have but I'm aware that's an issue between me and my children not one between me and the artists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

Do you know how the algorithm on TikTok works? Outed yourself there lol.

I know exactly how it works, but I wasn’t on it long enough for it to learn what I wanted to watch. My feed was also full of idiots doing the same joke about ‘getting on the bag’ and nauseating couples carrying out dance trends in public places, I was just as disinterested in those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

Do you know how the algorithm on TikTok works? Outed yourself there lol.

Nah at the start when you first set up your account it’s like that regardless of who you are, takes a short while for it to work out who you are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, squirrelarmy said:

Not being allowed to drink in those kind of temperatures is ridiculous. 

Alcohol dehydrates you - i agree the rule is stupid but water is what you want

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably not for me, but each to their own hey...

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2022/apr/18/coachella-high-energy-hedonism-surprise-stars-and-covid-concerns

"Coachella is sometimes as much about finding the perfect selfie light as it is musical act" check!

"the giant VIP section that segregates the event between the plebeians and what one passerby calls “Los Angeles privilege”, ie those who can afford a special wristband for the nice views, loos and bars" check!

"where fashion is more feted than the program itself" check!

"fairly large stable of forgettables whose TikTok numbers are the only notable thing about them (and some of whom clearly aren’t ready to perform to large crowds)" check!

"spirit-crushing queues for a cab home, or to get out of the car park at the end of the night" check!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mcshed said:

TikTok ≠ 14 Year Old Girls

I confess to not really getting TikTok but in my job as a bookseller we have over the last couple of years become used to books blowing up on TikTok and the customers buying these titles are definitely more the 18-25 demographic than the under 16s.

I’m a secondary school teacher. Kids are all over TikTok, Insta and Snapchat. The idea of using Facebook or Twitter is anathema to them. I’d say >90% of 13-16 year olds use Snap, >80% are on Insta and >70% are on TikTok. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, blutarsky said:

I’m a secondary school teacher. Kids are all over TikTok, Insta and Snapchat. The idea of using Facebook or Twitter is anathema to them. I’d say >90% of 13-16 year olds use Snap, >80% are on Insta and >70% are on TikTok. 

Glad to hear this, get social media back to stupid vids, fun trends for young people and cute animals. FB and Twitter are pits of people spouting toxic shite. 

Edited by 1986
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, blutarsky said:

I’m a secondary school teacher. Kids are all over TikTok, Insta and Snapchat. The idea of using Facebook or Twitter is anathema to them. I’d say >90% of 13-16 year olds use Snap, >80% are on Insta and >70% are on TikTok. 

But I'm guessing those numbers are pretty similar for 18-25 year olds they wouldn't use Facebook and do use TikTok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mcshed said:

But I'm guessing those numbers are pretty similar for 18-25 year olds they wouldn't use Facebook and do use TikTok.

I wouldn’t know - just making it known that anecdotally the idea younger teens don’t see stuff on TikTok is nonsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, blutarsky said:

I wouldn’t know - just making it known that anecdotally the idea younger teens don’t see stuff on TikTok is nonsense. 

I'm not saying that there aren't teens on TikTok just that it isn't a teen only space, that it's wildly inappropriate to have explicit lyrics on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mcshed said:

I'm not saying that there aren't teens on TikTok just that it isn't a teen only space, that it's wildly inappropriate to have explicit lyrics on.

Time to start a petition telling youtube to take the WAP music video down then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...