Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Coachella


mccdyl001

Recommended Posts

So this devolved into make us appear like narcissist assholes, great chat everyone. Maybe we should send the person who wrote this article to Glastonbury and you too will be the worst festival on the entire planet. There are thoughts and photos to come and they can be objective if you like. But we'll see when i get around to it. Gotta get ready for weekend 2 and one day having the weather at 20 is a real treat for once.

 

https://www.insider.com/coachella-real-life-photos-what-its-actually-like-disappointing-2022-4#the-experience-can-be-overwhelming-and-exhausting-19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

"Coachella in Indio, California is the most famous music festival in the world."

[citation needed]

More people have heard of Coachella than Glastonbury I reckon in fairness because of its social media presence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

So this devolved into make us appear like narcissist assholes, great chat everyone. Maybe we should send the person who wrote this article to Glastonbury and you too will be the worst festival on the entire planet. There are thoughts and photos to come and they can be objective if you like. But we'll see when i get around to it. Gotta get ready for weekend 2 and one day having the weather at 20 is a real treat for once.

 

https://www.insider.com/coachella-real-life-photos-what-its-actually-like-disappointing-2022-4#the-experience-can-be-overwhelming-and-exhausting-19

Jesus - either that article is incredible satire or whoever wrote it has clearly never been to a festival or any major event before in their life. People sitting down on the grass in the sunshine? How dare they! I also like their shock of seeing one water bottle on the floor… they’re going to have an aneurism if they ever see the state of the pyramid after a headliner!  
 

Regardless of what others think of Coachella, it’s all horses for courses. I’ve got mates go every year who regularly do Glasto and they always have a fun time - it’s a different experience but it’s still a chance to watch live music, in the sunshine with your friends, and I reckon that’s better than sitting at home! 
 

Hope you had a great weekend Supre. Not seen many of the sets yet, did watch Fred Again though who looked like he smashed it! 
 

EDIT - just saw this from the Fred gig, really hope he turns up on the farm!  https://www.instagram.com/reel/Ccg5AN8JzQO/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= 

Edited by mike46
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

So this devolved into make us appear like narcissist assholes, great chat everyone

It’s not the influencer status of the festival that has put me off. I’ve done hot dusty festivals. What made those bearable is having the option to go and cool off somewhere any time I wanted. I could pop back to the tent for a change of clothes any time I wanted to, get a couple of showers or even have a dip in the river. 
 

What also made it very comfortable was being able to buy some cold cans of beer and take them anywhere I wanted to drink in a rare spot of shade. 
 

Being bussed to and from your camping and forced to queue for hours to get anywhere without having access to drink doesn’t sound much like a music festival. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

If whoever wrote that article considers those to be "mud puddles", "crowds" and "trash everywhere" god only knows what they'd make of a British festival

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Suprefan said:

So this devolved into make us appear like narcissist assholes, great chat everyone. Maybe we should send the person who wrote this article to Glastonbury and you too will be the worst festival on the entire planet. There are thoughts and photos to come and they can be objective if you like. But we'll see when i get around to it. Gotta get ready for weekend 2 and one day having the weather at 20 is a real treat for once.

 

https://www.insider.com/coachella-real-life-photos-what-its-actually-like-disappointing-2022-4#the-experience-can-be-overwhelming-and-exhausting-19

Why are you so defensive of coachella? You got shares in it or something? You’re on a Glastonbury forum so any chat about coachella is bound to lead to comparisons between the 2 and from the comparisons, Glastonbury sounds a lot better I’m afraid (can’t compare myself as never been to coachella) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Suprefan said:

So this devolved into make us appear like narcissist assholes, great chat everyone. Maybe we should send the person who wrote this article to Glastonbury and you too will be the worst festival on the entire planet. There are thoughts and photos to come and they can be objective if you like. But we'll see when i get around to it. Gotta get ready for weekend 2 and one day having the weather at 20 is a real treat for once.

 

https://www.insider.com/coachella-real-life-photos-what-its-actually-like-disappointing-2022-4#the-experience-can-be-overwhelming-and-exhausting-19

You can find articles like this about anything in the world! Its not like you take this article seriously so why even bother posting it. I have no issue with Coachella but its the complete opposite to glastonbury so its clearly not going to down well on a forum centered around a 'hippie' festival that has super lenient alcohol / re-entry / everything policies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the issue is that over here we're only being exposed to what we'd consider to be the worst aspects of the festival. Coachella looks like a beautiful festival and the fantastic weather just adds to the attraction for me. Music-wise, a lot of genres are well-represented and although a great deal of it isn't to my taste, the same could be said of Glastonbury. I'd love to go one day, I don't think it'll ever happen now but if I did, I'd definitely go with an open mind, avoiding the temptation to make direct comparisons. 

I'm sure there's much that Coachella does better than Glastonbury and vice versa. Maybe a combination of both would result in the perfect festival? But to compare them seems impossible and unfair, to both events. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

I think the issue is that over here we're only being exposed to what we'd consider to be the worst aspects of the festival. Coachella looks like a beautiful festival and the fantastic weather just adds to the attraction for me. Music-wise, a lot of genres are well-represented and although a great deal of it isn't to my taste, the same could be said of Glastonbury. I'd love to go one day, I don't think it'll ever happen now but if I did, I'd definitely go with an open mind, avoiding the temptation to make direct comparisons. 

I'm sure there's much that Coachella does better than Glastonbury and vice versa. Maybe a combination of both would result in the perfect festival? But to compare them seems impossible and unfair, to both events. 

The only thing I can see Coachella does better is having more stable, guaranteed weather, even then it might be too hot for some. Some of the stage production on the main stage probably looks better than the Pyramid, other than that there is literally nothing else you can say is better there than at Glastonbury.

What one thing do you think you’d like to bring to Glastonbury from there?

Edited by Deaf Nobby Burton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

Coachella looks like a beautiful festival and the fantastic weather just adds to the attraction for me.

It's personal taste, but beautiful isn't a word that'd ever occur to me. From admittedly limited pictures and video, I get the impression that it's basically a flat site with a few palm trees dotted around the place, and a layout designed in excel - whenever I see an aerial shot, my gut reaction is along the lines of "fuck that looks depressing".

Utilitarian would be the word I'd use to describe the aesthetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

What one thing do you think you’d like to bring to Glastonbury from there?

From what I've seen, I think I'd have to say the variety of the different stage types, coupled with the production values within each, which you already touched upon. I appreciate that they probably only achieve this through the revenue from corporate sponsorship but still, I prefer it to the generic tents and stages setup. My favourite stages at Glastonbury are those with a little more creativity in the environment, I can only imagine what the Shangri-la and Silver Hayes teams could come up with if they had a larger budget. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

From what I've seen, I think I'd have to say the variety of the different stage types, coupled with the production values within each, which you already touched upon. I appreciate that they probably only achieve this through the revenue from corporate sponsorship but still, I prefer it to the generic tents and stages setup. My favourite stages at Glastonbury are those with a little more creativity in the environment, I can only imagine what the Shangri-la and Silver Hayes teams could come up with if they had a larger budget. 

I actually said further up the thread there would be some merit in some venues at Glastonbury having the arch type structures they’ve got. Places like Avalon and Williams Green are regularly far too busy for their capacity and unless you’re in the tent you don’t get a fraction of the experience. They would enable people outside to still enjoy performances as well (and enable bigger/better production). The trade off would be losing the character and the quintessentially British aspect of the marquee type tents Glastonbury have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, incident said:

It's personal taste, but beautiful isn't a word that'd ever occur to me. From admittedly limited pictures and video, I get the impression that it's basically a flat site with a few palm trees dotted around the place, and a layout designed in excel - whenever I see an aerial shot, my gut reaction is along the lines of "fuck that looks depressing".

Utilitarian would be the word I'd use to describe the aesthetic.

That's interesting, isn't it? Because to my eye, those palm tree laden grounds with the mountains in the background look beautiful. And each stage of the day looks equally great, from the unbridled sunshine throughout the day, to the orange glow at sunset and the neon explosions at nighttime. 

Glastonbury has its own unique beauty of course, and each of the stages of day/night are as spectacular as Coachella's. They're just different. And very difficult to directly compare, which I guess was my original point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

The trade off would be losing the character and the quintessentially British aspect of the marquee type tents Glastonbury have.

Maybe that's the next stage of Glastonbury's evolution? Is that what's going to keep the public interested going forward? Like a great deal of modern pop music, I won't be amongst the target audience for future Glastonbury, maybe a stripy tent or a basic stage setup won't be enough for a generation that places importance on style as well as substance?

The festival has been here before. It looks nothing like the versions of 1971, 1994 or even 2008. I wonder what the place will look like in 2025? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

Maybe that's the next stage of Glastonbury's evolution? Is that what's going to keep the public interested going forward? Like a great deal of modern pop music, I won't be amongst the target audience for future Glastonbury, maybe a stripy tent or a basic stage setup won't be enough for a generation that places importance on style as well as substance?

The festival has been here before. It looks nothing like the versions of 1971, 1994 or even 2008. I wonder what the place will look like in 2025? 

Hover stages

Edited by philipsteak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

I actually said further up the thread there would be some merit in some venues at Glastonbury having the arch type structures they’ve got. Places like Avalon and Williams Green are regularly far too busy for their capacity and unless you’re in the tent you don’t get a fraction of the experience.

I've had a number of wet (or overly sunny) years when I've very much appreciated the marquee tents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

That's interesting, isn't it? Because to my eye, those palm tree laden grounds with the mountains in the background look beautiful. And each stage of the day looks equally great, from the unbridled sunshine throughout the day, to the orange glow at sunset and the neon explosions at nighttime. 

Glastonbury has its own unique beauty of course, and each of the stages of day/night are as spectacular as Coachella's. They're just different. And very difficult to directly compare, which I guess was my original point.

Coachella is an awesome venue to watch acts in, as you said the surroundings are the best you will have. Being able to see mountain through the back of a main stage. Sound is awesome and the layout is great. The choices of places to buy essentials was limited to one hut when I went and food choices were something hot was literally one hut outside the camp.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...